THE IDENTITY CONFLICT OF THE SYMBOLIC DOMINATION DISCOURSE IN THE SHORT STORIES OF MODERN CIVILIZATION

,


INTRODUCTION
When somebody writes on a keyword, as like 'violence' on the browser, he/she will face some definitions from digital dictionaries to world organizations, which intention about humanity's problem.On the same side, this internet media will show or lead every user to the news that somebody is hurting somebody else.
Thus, this action also has referenced to the other conflict, i.e., domination (or what Wardhana says, whether physical or symbolic domination (2013: 13)), colonialism, and identity.Domination action as the description of the people below who dominated will not realize that they are in rough conditions.Besides, sometimes, they will feel that the incident before was caused by their actions in the past.That is why these persons will say, "It is a fate" or in other words, as defenceless and submissive to such as a pair of feet.They are walking side by side.Thus, they have a similar tendency to hurt someone or subject outside herself or himself.Thus, it is not only in real life that domination power and colonialism are happening, but literature also shows the reality by the words.Even literature writing is close to the definition of fiction that it does not occur in real life, on the other hand, Bennet and Royle say ". . .literature is the kind of writing which most persistently and most provocatively engages with the uncanny aspects of experience, thought and feeling " (2004: 35).It is because the literature consists of everyday life.That is why in the literature writing, the reader able to see the different world or the other justice and justification.
When literature draws some domination and colonialism, then the short story can not loose from our sight because this kind of work always shows the reality of the fiction.Anatomy by Padrika Tarrant and Otobiografi by A.S. Laksana are the short stories describing the symbolic violence and domination of the main characters.That is why, in this article, the researcher is going to find out the power and dominated from two short stories above.Two main things in this research should have discussed.The first is how the symbolic order dominated 'I' lyric (read: woman).The second is how the postcolonial discourse has to be a specific problem for 'I' lyric.These things above are not about how good the writer made it and pregnant before marriage is a common problem.It is because this story has an essential issue, i.e., gender, and again, the woman is always to be the victim.
The first character of this short story, especially Anatomy by Padrika Tarrant, is a woman (student) who studied in the medical faculty.She gets herself pregnant.This incident happens when she admires (even after she knew she is pregnant) her lecture; his name is Finn.Her lecturer has described as a man who has an ethical manner, very masculine, good looking, and the last he looks like a god.These appearances indicate why she falls in love with him and giving her genitals to this lecturer.
After they had sex, in the beginning, she became conscious and anxious with her belly, which was keeping the womb.Once, she only brought some pictures, which was she drew for her Finn.However, her lecture became angry because of those sketches.By these actions, there were some interpretations.First, they were anxious about their condition and, of course, by their cause.Second, Finn and her student, especially 'I' lyric, was to be inferior also to be superior.Unfortunately, these interpretations will have discussed in the next pages below.Finally, this woman will not bring them for him because she worries if she gives them to her idol, she will have expelled by the officer or the men from the campus.
When she feels baby in her womb, she feels like she has to make a distance from her friend in the dorm.This short story, the main character, does not tell why she has to keep away from people around her. Maybe she will not reveal her new identity as a woman who had failed from the university and a young mother.After that, only waste her time by going to the museum and walk around the campus.
The second short story is also the female character as the victim.Her name is Gloria.She told that before her life now was a newborn baby.After that, her grandfather killed him.It was because her mother had an unwed pregnancy.The primary expectation from her grandparents had a grandchild from their first daughter.Even their parents were travelling to other places to get a magic potion or something to make her daughter pregnant.However, this daughter could not have any baby from her married.In the middle of the story, she admitted that she understood why her grandfather had to cut her throat.It was calling, she said.This calling was like whispering, which was happening to kill someone.
On the same side, her grandparents were disappointing for their children.
The first child is female.This daughter cannot has a child even got married.The second is a male.Even this son had Islamic School before; however, he had a problem with his life, such as drink any alcohol and suicide.
Moreover, the last is Gloria's mother, who had unwed pregnancy.This story will show the reader that the atmosphere from the main character retold was not any revenge to show.In the last story, the main character had killed since a baby.
In the last of the story, also, that this ghost who had murdered by her grandfather.
She had told her case by the media.This media is to trance someone and then to write something.This writing form has awakened her spirit to enter the living Received March 18, 2020; Revised, April 12, 2020 ; Accepted April 30, 2020 body, i.e., A.S. Laksana.She has a memory of how she died and how her mother has not expected to pregnant.

THEORY
Domination is not the quantity of a group of people or ethnicities, which are surrounded by other people in either one or another place.After that, they live in assimilation.On the same side, it is also not only about binary from the status of the boss (superior) and about employer (inferior) correlation.In Haryatmoko's book, Bourdieu gives the point of view that the way of domination has imposed and suffered by the others as the compliance, the effect of symbolic violence, subtle violence, misperceive, undetectable by the victims (2010: 10).It means there is nothing force action in domination because it has accepted by the dominated subject and the dominant subject.Moreover, the way it is by the unconsciousness.
When someone kills, slams, and punch other people [read: the other], it is not only because he/she was angry with others.Even the action above is part of the crime and where Mayr says ". . .crime is simply the action of bad people" (2008: 2); it could be curiosity that maybe something is happening inside the subject's psychology.It means disorder.However, when we face the illustration that someone gives the command and someone else (the other) obediently does something that she/he also wants, indeed, it has a possibility that the first subject is a boss and the second one is the employer.On the other side, these actions are not the final evaluation because they could have referred to domination and power.That is why Haryatmoko says in society's life, there are ones dominant and dominated (2010: 17).Domination also referred to the discourse that women's position has forced on the cornered, is it in the society or institution.First, for denotation meaning, women as the weak point of view.Unfortunately, they as if accept this stereotype and affirm that male as the superior subject.Finally, they get themselves to the second class and cannot have some voice to make them out to the public as a unique subject.This situation also correlates ". . . in particular the power relations in which they are held, through schemes of thought that are the product of an embodiment of those power relations and which expressed in the founding oppositions of the symbolic order" (Bourdieu, 1998: 33-34).
In the symbolic order, the subject will realize that the rule, the stereotype, the world point of view are the building of cognition, and this subject will no doubt three things before because they viewed as part of the absolute rightness.It is what Bourdieu calls as doxa.This term will have explained through an example story such as Dayen gets herself before the zebra crossing and sits in her car.Then, she cannot go straight further, because her eyes already saw the red light is on.Her mind says, if she does not care about the traffic light, she will run her car, and the accident will happen, or the police will give her a ticket.Maybe for the familiar people that stop in front of the red light is an ethical manner, and the subject does not break the rule.On the other side, there is a hidden force and power because the dominant, i.e., government, does not need a weapon or verbal domination power to make the community obey the rule.It just needs the cognition to affirm.Bourdieu also clarifies, "It follows that their acts of perception are acts of practical recognition, doxic acceptance, a belief that does not need to be thought and affirmed as such, and which in a sense 'makes' the symbolic violence which it undergoes" (1998: 34).
Even doxa is the final step of the subject to recognize and accept the domination, however in the process of how the human subject affirms this domination is by habitus.Emirbayer and Johnson in Smith ( 2007) also have agreed with Bourdieu, "Symbolic violence is lodged in an individual's 'durable principles of judgment and practice' -the habitus."It means that the habitus practices will guide the subject to the activity (or more) that he or she doing in everyday life.It could take an example that they (husbands) are like get up early in the morning and go to the office; tell his wife that salary is on the account bank and give some money to his wife; (in Indonesia) when the Friday has come every employer has to wear white baju koko (long-sleeved collarless shirt).In other words, these activities correlate with symbolic violence and doxa.
Because doxa is the peak of symbolic violence, this doxa will show how the dominant subject can reach, hold, and spread the power with the symbolic game, which has succeeded in influencing the dominated's cognition until the human subject lost his or her critical thinking by the dominant.The irony thing is the dominated see him or herself as the same as the dominant.The human subject that has been intimidated, however, he or she does not feel it.This situation calls as doxa (Wattimena, 2012).
The doxa is a symbolic practice that a person who dominated has consciousness to accept the dominating program.Thus, this discourse will show the subject's identity that has drawn as the concept of weak and subaltern.The self cannot give the status him or herself, because Butler says "that identity is performatively constituted by the very 'expressions' that are said to be its results" (1999: 33).This performative is pointing to how the subject's appearance to the other people.That is why the other will evaluate his or her appearance.Besides, the presence itself is not about the dress, but how the subject's attitude.When identity is not stable to identify people, then identity is taken to mean also aggressively constructed in an instant.Then gender identity, defined as a person's understanding of themselves as being feminine or masculine regardless of their biological sex and also identity needs the presence of the subject (Wood and Eagly, 2015;Niven, Jose, Rawstorne & Nathan, 2017;Sutikno and Supena, 2016).
To understand the subject, someone needs the presence to show from others.It is why the phenomenon of the subject has angles to comprehend because others' perspective who looked at the subject.
For the ideal perspective, that identity concerns about appearance frequently in respondents' motivations, as did issues of relative identities with men, and thereby encounter within themselves became noteworthy (P and Unnithan, 2017: 36).In gender context, identity theorists also maintain that individuals pursue Received March 18, 2020; Revised, April 12, 2020 ; Accepted April 30, 2020 behaviours.These behaviours are about reliable with their gender identity.The degree that they embrace masculinity and femininity also one of the practices.Furthermore, besides, avoid conduct that violates the meanings associated with their gender identity (Jun & Kyle, 2012: 354).
What is vital for understanding identity processes is not how the structure of society views authority figures or official familial members per se, but rather how proximal agents nurture and socialize children.Families are the proximate agents of identity socialization; both identity theory and identity control theory can explain the socialization process regardless if these agents fall within the traditional boundaries of "family," or if they are qualitatively different (243).
The identity is a social phenomenon, which starts with the identity formation process through interaction with the 'other' or against the 'other.'The individual tends to internalize and behaviours practice, values, and norms of the society where he or she has lived in, to provide his or her psychological and physical safety.In this way, to obtain an identity, one must either recognize oneself with someone and or be apparent as identical to someone else.The continuous and permanent internalization processes of the social setting have resulted in the construction of individual identity within a social dimension (İnaç and Ünal, 2013: 223).

METHODS
The method of this research is using the qualitative descriptive because the subjects are short stories.In another sentence, it means that this method is related to the judge's value of works.Semi also assures that the qualitative methods have based on the interaction of inter-conception and comprehend the profound meaning inside (Semi, 2012: 11).The data that has collected from the sentences of short stories are Anatomy by Padrika Tarrant and Otobiografi Gloria by A.S.
Laksana.After researchers read the data based on heuristics and hermeneutics, the data will have classified on the domination conflict and identity.

DISCUSSION
On the same side During says that "Identities, then, are not given in terms of what individuals are as a whole, but in terms of more or less arbitrarily selected features that they possess."It means identity processing has not any final addressing people.He also explains, "For the most part, individuals have little power to choose what features will have used to identify them -these are determined socially, from the outside" (2005: 145).