Model Implementation Trap of Policy New Student Acceptance Zoning System in Makassar City

Nuryanti Mustari, Rudi Hardi, Amir Muhiddin

Abstract


Implementing the zoning system in the 2019/2020 school year imposed by the Makassar city government through the Education Office caused various problems. This study's specific purpose is (1) To examine the characteristics of the New Student Acceptance problem of the zoning system, (2) explore the supporting capacity of the regulations, 3. non-regulatory environmental factors that affect the implementation of the PPDB zoning system. 4. Implementation trap of policy. The Research Method used is a qualitative method, and the appropriate type of research is a case study.  The results showed that the New Student Acceptance problem zoning system characteristics, among others: Infrastructure readiness problems for online registration, Lack of socialization of PPDB system to prospective students and parents, thus confusing. The implementation trap of policy, the policy objective is too vague or broad to be converted into action, the target specification is not clearly defined due to weak guidelines on how goals can be achieved, or undefined standards or actions to be taken, either in implementing, or the target community. Finally, problems also arise when the chain of responsibility for implementing a policy is unclear.

Penerapan sistem zonasi pada tahun ajaran 2019/2020 yang diberlakukan pemerintah kota Makassar melalui Dinas Pendidikan menimbulkan berbagai permasalahan. Tujuan khusus penelitian ini adalah (1) Untuk meneliti karakteristik masalah Penerimaan Siswa Baru dari system zonasi, (2) mengeksplorasi daya dukung peraturan, 3. Factor lingkungan non-regulasi yang mempengaruhi penerapan system zonasi PPDB. 4. Perangkap implementasi kebijakan. Metode Penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode kualitatif, dan jenis penelitian yang sesuai adalah studi kasus.  Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa karakteristik system zonasi masalah Penerimaan Siswa Baru antara lain: Masalah kesiapan infrastruktur untuk pendaftaran online, Kurangnya sosialisasi sistem PPDB kepada calon siswa dan orang tua, sehingga membingungkan. Jebakan implementasi kebijakan  , tujuan kebijakan terlalu kabur atau luas untuk dikonversi menjadi tindakan, spesifikasi target tidak didefinisikan dengan jelas karena pedoman yang lemah tentang bagaimana tujuan dapat dicapai, atau standar atau tindakan yang tidak terdefinisi untuk diambil, baik dalam menerapkan, atau komunitas target. Akhirnya, masalah juga muncul ketika rantai tanggung jawab untuk menerapkan kebijakan tidak jelas.

 


Keywords


Implementation Trap Of Policy; Zoning System; PPDB

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akib, H. (2010). Implementasi Kebijakan: Apa, mengapa dan Bagimana. Jurnal Adminstrasi Publik, 1(1), 1–11. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/97794-ID-implementasi-kebijakan-apa-mengapa-dan-b.pdf

Andina, E. (2017). Sistem Zonasi dan Dampak Psikososial Bagi Peserta Didik. Bidang Kesejahteraan Sosial Puslit Badan Keahlian DPR, IX(14), 9–12.

Bakar, K. A. A., Supriyati, Y., & Hanafi, I. (2019). The Evaluation of Admission Student Policy based on Zoning Sys-tem for Acceleration Education Quality in Indonesia. Journal of Management Info, 6(2), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.31580/jmi.v6i2.883

Bell, L. A. (2020). Education Policy: Development and Enactment—The Case of Human Capital. In Handbook of Education Policy Studies: Values, Governance, Globalization, and Methodology (pp. 1–414). Springer, Singapore.

Bintoro, R. F. A. (2018). Public Perception Regarding Policy Implementation On School Zoning Policy In The Acceptance Of High School New Students Year 2017/2018 In Samarinda. Jurnal Riset Pembangunan, 1(20), 48–57.

Budiharso, T., & Tarman, B. (2020). Improving quality education through better working conditions of academic institutes. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(1), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/306

Datuk, A. (2020). Sistem Zonasi Sebagai Solusi Bagi Orang Tua untuk Mendapatkan Pendidikan Anak yang Bermutu di Kota Kupang. Innovative Education Journal, 2(2), 1–13.

Figlio, D., Giuliano, P., Özek, U., & Sapienza, P. (2019). Long-Term Orientation and Educational Performance. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 11(4), 272–309. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20180374

Harakan, A. (2017). Efektivitas pelaksanaan kebijakan sistem kelas tuntas berkelanjutan di kabupaten Gowa. Aristo, 5(1).

Hasanuddin, M. (2019, July 26). Warga Makassar keluhkan Penerapan sistem zonasi DB 2019. Antara News. htts://makassar.antaranews.com/berita/128265/warga-makassar-keluhkan-eneraan-sistem-zonasi-db-2019.

Hasnadi. (2019). Perencanaan Sumber Daya Manusia Pendidikan. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 10(2), 141–148. http://ejournal.staindirundeng.ac.id/index.php/bidayah/article/view/270/178

Howlett, M., & Ramesh. (2003). Studying Public Policy : Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Oxford University Press.

Kadji, Y. (2015). Formulasi Dan Imlementasi Kebijakan Publik: Kepemiminan dan Perilaku Birokrasi dalam Fakta Realitas. UNG Press Gorontalo.

Mahyani, E. R., Wahyunengseh, R. D., & Haryanti, R. H. (2019). Public Perception of Zoning School Policy in Surakarta Public Senior High Schools. 343(Icas), 274–278. https://doi.org/10.2991/icas-19.2019.56

Nurlailiyah, A. (2019). Analisis Kebijakan Sistem Zonasi Terhadap Perilaku Siswa SMP di Yogyakarta. Realita, 17(1), 13–22.

Põder, K., Lauri, T., & Veski, A. (2017). Does School Admission by Zoning Affect Educational Inequality? A Study of Family Background Effect in Estonia, Finland, and Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(6), 668–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1173094

Purwanti, D., Irawati, I., & Adiwisastra, J. (2018). Efektivitas Kebijakan Penerimaan Peserta Didik Baru Sistem Zonasi Bagi Siswa Rawan Melanjutkan Pendidikan. Dinamika, 5(4), 1–7. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/dinamika.v5i4.1737

Safarah, A. A., & Wibowo, U. B. (2018). PROGRAM ZONASI DI SEKOLAH DASAR SEBAGAI UPAYA PEMERATAAN KUALITAS PENDIDIKAN DI INDONESIA. Lentera Pendidikan : Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan, 21(2), 206. https://doi.org/10.24252/lp.2018v21n2i6

Schiller, M. (2017). The implementation trap: the local level and diversity policies. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(2), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852315590204

Schröder, A., & Kruger, D. (2020). Social Innovation as a Driver for New Educational Pratices: Modernising, Reparing and Transforming the Education System. Nature/Sustainability, 11(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041070

Syamsuriyanti, S., & Sukirno, S. (2018). Faktor determinasi profesionalisme guru. Harmoni Sosial: Jurnal Pendidikan IPS, 4(2), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.21831/hsjpi.v4i2.10321

Woolf, N. H., & Silver, C. (2018). Qualitative Analysis Using Nvivo, The Five Level QDA Method. In Routledge. New York and London: Routledge.

Yoo, S. S., Mosrur, R., Lee, E., & Andrea, D. T. (2019). Development as education for social justice. Asia Pacific Education Review, 20(2), 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09603-2




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/jgcs.v5i1.3225

Article Metrics

Abstract - 931 PDF - 505

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Government and Civil Society

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


 

Journal of Government and Civil Society is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License