Peran Komunikasi Sibernetika bagi Keselamatan Penerbangan

Toto Soebandoro

doi:10.31000/nyimak.v3i2.1545

Peran Komunikasi Sibernetika bagi Keselamatan Penerbangan

Toto Soebandoro

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk (1) mengetahui dan mengungkapkan latar belakang pentingnya komunikasi sibernetika dalam penerbangan, khususnya dalam rangka mewujudkan keselamatan penerbangan; dan (2) mengetahui aktivitas pemrosesan informasi dalam pengambilan keputusan oleh Pilot in Command di ruang terbatas ketika pilot mengalami tekanan psikologis akibat keadaan darurat, sementara pilot juga harus melakukan pendaratan darurat. penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif dan menggunakan paradigm postpositivisme. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui studi teks dan wawancara mendalam (indepth interview). Adapun analisis data pada penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan analisis kasus bertingkat, dengan metode multilevel analysis serta model kajian eksploratif. Hasil penelitian memperlihatkan bahwa (1) komunikasi sibernetika merupakan pilar yang penting bagi pilot dalam mewujudkan keselamatan penerbangan; (2) keberhasilan dalam mengoptimalkan komunikasi sibernetika berdampak pada kemampuan pilot dalam mengatasi tekanan psikologis yang dialami sehingga mampu mencari jalan keluar dari keadaan darurat.

Kata Kunci: Komunikasi sibernetika, keselamatan penerbangan, pendaratan darurat

ABSTRACT

This research aims to (1) find out and reveal the background of the importance of cybernetics communication in flight, particularly in realizing flight safety; and (2) knowing information processing activities in decision making by Pilots in Command in confined spaces when pilots experience psychological pressure due to emergencies, while pilots must also make an emergency landing. This research is qualitative study and uses postpositivism paradigm. Data collection techniques using text studies and in-depth interviews (indepth interview). The data analysis in this study was carried out using multilevel case analysis, with multilevel analysis methods and explorative study model. The results of this research showed that (1) cybernetics communication is an important pillar for pilots in realizing aviation safety; (2) the success in optimizing cybernetics communication has an impact on the ability of pilots to cope with psychological stress experienced so that they are able to find a way out of an emergency situation.

Keywords: Cybernetics communication, flight safety, emergency landing

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adkinsa, J. Y., Adamsa, K. MacG., & Hesterb, P. T. (2016). How System Errors Affect Aircrew Resource Management (CRM). Procedia Computer Science, 61, 281–286.

Bao, M., & Ding, S. (2014). Individual-related factors and Management-related factors in Aviation Maintenance. Procedia Engineering, 80, 293–302.

Baugh, B. S., & Stolzer, A. J. (2018). Language-Related Communications Challenges in General Aviation Operations and Pilot Training. International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace, 5(4), 1–16.

Fajer, M., de Almeida, I. M., & Fischer, F. M. (2011). Contributive factors to aviation accidents. Rev Saúde Pública, 45(2), 1–4.

Gontar, P., Fischer, U., & Bengler, K. (2017). Methods to Evaluate Pilots’ Cockpit Communication: Cross-Recurrence Analyses vs. Speech Act–Based Analyses. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 11(4), 337–352.

Hajiyousefi, H., Asadi, H., & Jafari, A. (2017). Work Stress among Flight Attendants; The Perspective of a Standard Sports Examination Designing as a Prerequisite to Flight License. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 11(1), 31–40.

Hamzah, H., & Fei, W. F. (2018). Miscommunication in Pilot-controller Interaction. The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 24(4), 199–213.

Helmreich, R. L. (2000). On error management: Lessons from aviation. BMJ, 320, 781–785.

Kang, I., Han, S., & Lee, J. (2017). Task-Oriented and Relationship-Building Communications between Air Traffic Controllers and Pilots. Sustainability, 9(10), 1770.

Li, W.-C., & Harris, D. (2006). Breaking the Chain: An Empirical Analysis of Accident Causal Factors by Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS). ISASI 2006 Annual Air Safety Seminar, 1–16.

Linde, C. (1988). The Quantitative Study of Communicative Success: Politeness and Accidents in Aviation Discourse. Language in Society, 17(3), 375–399.

Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss, K. (2009). Theories of Human Communication. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Merriti, A. C., & Helmreich, R. L. (1996). Human Factors on the Flight Deck: The Influence of National Culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27(1), 5–24.

Mosier, K. L., Rettenmaier, P., McDearmid, M., Wilson, J., Mak, S., Raj, L., & Orasanu, J. (2013). Pilot–ATC Communication Conflicts: Implications for NextGen. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 23(3), 213–226.

Mosier, K. L., Skitka, L. J., Heers, S., & Burdick, M. (1997). Automation Bias: Decision Making and Performance in High-Tech Cockpits. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 8(1), 47–63.

Muñoz-Marrón, D. (2018). Human Factors in Aviation: CRM (Crew Resource Management). Psychologist Papers, 39(3), 191–199.

O’Hagan, A. D., Issartel, J., Nevill, A., & Warrington, G. (2016). Flying Into Depression: Pilot’s Sleep and Fatigue Experiences Can Explain Differences in Perceived Depression and Anxiety Associated With Duty Hours. Workplace Health & Safety, 65(3), 109–117.

Saputra, A. D., Priyanto, S., & Muthohar, I. (2017). Pilot Metal Workload in Flight Operation: A case study of Indonesian Civilian Pilot. Aceh International Journal of Science and Technology, 6(1).

Schultz, J. (2002). Hear What They’re Saying: The Influence of Culture on Cockpit Communication. Quest, 5(1).

Sexton, B., & Helmreich, R. (2000). Analyzing Cockpit Comunications: Links Between Language, Performance, Error, and Workload. Journal of Human Performance in Extreme Environments, 5(1), 63–49.

Sriussadaporn, R. (2006). Managing international business communication problems at work: A pilot study in foreign companies in Thailand. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 13(4), 330–344.

Wagner, M., Sahar, Y., Elbaum, T., Botzer, A., & Berliner, E. (2016). Grip Force as a Measure of Stress in Aviation. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 25(3–4), 157–170.

Wahab, S. R. A., & Shuen, Y. S. (2019). The Relationship Between Safety Communication and Human Factor Accident at The Workplace – A Conceptual Framework. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 17(1), 1–4.

Waikar, A., & Nichols, P. (1997). Aviation safety: A quality perspective. Disaster Prevention and Management, 6(2), 87–93.

Wu, Q., Molesworth, B. R. C., & Estival, D. (2019). An Investigation into the Factors that Affect Miscommunication between Pilots and Air Traffic Controllers in Commercial Aviation. The International Journal of Aerospace Psychology, 29(1–2), 53–63.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/nyimak.v3i2.1545