Licensing Disputes in The State Administrative Court System

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31000/ijlp.v5i1.15965

Keywords:

licensing dispute, administrative law, administrative court, legality principle, good governance

Abstract

Licensing is an administrative instrument used by the government to regulate public activities that may generate social, economic, and environmental impacts. In practice, however, the issuance of permits frequently results in disputes due to procedural defects, abuse of authority, and violations of general principles of good governance. This study aims to analyze the characteristics of licensing disputes, the legal framework governing judicial review, and the effectiveness of the Administrative Court in providing legal protection to citizens. The research applies a normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches through the examination of administrative law doctrine and court decisions. The findings indicate that most licensing disputes originate from weak administrative verification, improper use of discretion, and non-compliance with the principles of legality and legal certainty. The Administrative Court functions as a supervisory mechanism by reviewing the legality of administrative decisions and restoring the rights of affected parties. Nevertheless, its effectiveness remains limited due to technical evidentiary difficulties and weak enforcement of judicial decisions by administrative authorities. Therefore, strengthening administrative oversight mechanisms and ensuring execution of court judgments are necessary to establish accountable governance

References

Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan.

Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 jo. Undang-Undang Nomor 51 Tahun 2009 tentang PTUN.

Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup.

Philipus M. Hadjon. Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia. Gadjah Mada University Press. Ridwan HR. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Rajawali Pers.

Boedi Harsono. Hukum Agraria Indonesia. Djambatan.

Nurjaya, I Nengah. “Asas-Asas Pemerintahan yang Baik dalam Perizinan.†IUS QUIA IUSTUM

Philipus M. Hadjon, Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia, (Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2011), hlm. 45–47.

Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.

Maria Farida Indrati, Ilmu Perundang-Undangan, (Jakarta: Kanisius, 2007), hlm. 122–124.

Undang-Undang No. 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup.

Undang-Undang No. 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup.

Ridwan HR, Hukum Administrasi Negara, (Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2014), hlm. 98–101.

Adrian Sutedi, Hukum Perizinan dalam Sektor Pelayanan Publik, (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2019), hlm. 54–59.

Undang-Undang No. 32 Tahun 2009 tentang PPLH.

Yulia Sari, Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan, Vol. 4 No. 2, 2018.

Dyah Ayu Sulistyarini Problematika Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Terkait Sengketa Sertifikat Tanah Yang Overlapping Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): April

Muhammad Reza Syariffudin Zaki Analisis Yuridis Pembatalan Hak Atas Sertifikat Tanah Oleh Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Akibat Sengketa Kepemilikan Ganda Vol. 4 No. 2 (2020)

Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung menunjukkan putusan PTUN Samarinda No. 9/G/2023/PTUN.SMD

PTUN Samarinda No. 9/G/2023/PTUN.SMD, Hal 16

Downloads

Published

2024-05-20