Execution of Fiduciary Collateral Based on the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31000/ijlp.v1i2.3165Keywords:
Execution, Fiduciary, Constitutional CourtAbstract
The Constitutional Court responded to the existence of a debt collector who had been very unsettling by the Constitutional Court by issuing Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 dated January 6, 2020. Based on the request for a judicial review of Law 42/1999 submitted by husband and wife Apriliani Dewi and Suri Agung Prabowo . Apriliani is a fiduciary who experiences direct losses as a result of creditors' withdrawal of the object of fiduciary security in the form of a car. Both applicants are declared to have legal standing in submitting a request for a judicial review. The Constitutional Court granted it with Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019. In this decision, the execution mechanism for the fiduciary guarantee object was changed by the Constitutional Court as long as it was not provided voluntarily by the debtor. Previously, the Fiduciary Law allowed creditors to execute the object of fiduciary collateral themselves, but now to carry out the execution, creditors must submit an application to the District Court. However, the implementation of direct execution by the creditor without going through the District Court can be done if the debtor admits that there is a default or default in his agreement with the creditor.
References
Ade, A. dan Edia, H. (2009). Bank dan Lembaga Keuangan Bukan Bank. Jakarta Barat: PT. Macanan Jaya Cemerlang.
Agus, Y. H. (2014). Hukum Perjanjian: Asas Proporsionalitas Dalam Kontrak Komersial. Cet. IV Jakarta: Prenada Media.
Aprilianti. (2011). Perjanjian Sewa Guna Usaha antara Lesse dan Lessor. Fiat Justisia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. ISSN: 1978-5186. 5(3), September-Desember 2011
Arya, W. D. (2020). Lembaga Jaminan Fidusia: Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019. Nagari Law Review. 3(2).
Ita, A. (2018). Perusahaan leasing dan Debt Collector dalam Penagihan Kredit Macet Kendaraan Debitur. Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan. ISSN: 2338-4638. 2(8).
James, R. E. (2020). Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019. 12(1).
Jatmiko, W. (2015). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur pada Perjanjian Jaminan Fidusia. Jurnal Independent. Fakuktas Hukum Universitas Islam Lamongan. 7(3).
Joni, A. (2020). Rekonstruksi Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019. Eksekusi. 2(1).
Khifni, K. R. and Rian S. (2019). Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Tanpa Titel Eksekutorial Yang Sah. Refleksi Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. 4.
Khotibul, U. (2010). Hukum Lembaga Pembiayaan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Yustisia.
M. Yahya, Harahap. (2005). Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
M. Yasir. (2016). Aspek Hukum Jaminan Fidusia. Salam Jurnal Sosial & Budaya Syari. Jakarta: UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. 3(1).
Moch. Isnaeni. (2017). Pengantar Hukum Jaminan Kebendaan. Yogyakarta: LaksBang PRESSindo.
Munir, F. (2013). Hukum Jaminan Utang. Jakarta: PT Erlangga.
Nahrowi. (2013). Permasalahan Hukum Pembiayaan Leasing di Indonesia. Jurnal Cita Hukum. 1(1).
Nining, W. (2013). Sewa Guna Usaha (Leasing) dalam Perspektif Syariah. Jurnal Al-Amwal. ISSN: 2303-1573. 5(1).
Shavira, R. (2017). Penarikan Kendaraan Bermotor Oleh Perusahaan Pembiayaan Terhadap Debitur Yang Mengalami Kredit Macet (Wanprestasi) Dengan Jaminan Fidusia Ditinjau Dari Aspek Yuridis. Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Hukum. 6(2).
Sri, S. (2014). Hukum Jaminan di Indonesia Pokok-Pokok Hukum Jaminan dan Jaminan Perorangan. Yogyakarta: Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Departemen Kehakiman, Liberty.
Sugianto. (2014). Rekontruksi Perjanjian Fidusia atas Benda Bergerak yang didaftarkan Berdasarkan Nilai Keadilan. Jurnal Pembaharua Hukum 1(3).
Sunaryo. (2007). Hukum Lembaga Pembiayaan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Vera, R. S. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Debt Collector Dan Leasing Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019. Gorontalo Law Review. 1(2).
Zaeni, A. (2018). Hukum Keperdataan dalam Perspektif Hukum Nasional, Perdata (BW), Hukum Islam, dan Hukum Adat. Depok: PT. Raja Grafindo.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, the copyright of the article shall be assigned to Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies, Post Graduate in Law Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang, Indonesia as the publisher of the journal.
Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies (IJLPS) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies (IJLPS). Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies (IJLPS). Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).