mul yati


BSTRACT: Kyai Ahmad Dahlan is indeed a charitable person. He is not just thinking, and understanding the problem. But more importantly, he thinks far ahead, and looks for fundamental problem solutions. Even more than that, Kyai Dahlan directly led the struggle itself; made himself, his wife, and his family a role model for struggle. Despite being colonized economically, politically, and militarily, Kyai Dahlan understands well that the root of the problems of the people and the nation lies in the problem of education. From this education will be born cadres of the people and the nation. It is recognized that the philosophical way of thinking has broken down the doors and walls of traditions and customs, and has even uncovered myths and abandoned mystical ways of thinking. The same thing has also succeeded in developing ways of thinking rationally and deeply, integrally and coherently, methodically and systematically, logically, critically, and analytically. Therefore, science is growing, growing and maturing. Thoughts K.H. Ahmad Dahlan on Islamic education is closer to Perennial Philosophy thinking. Islamic education is more colored by its religious spirit by developing integrative, cooperative, accommodating and comprehensive education with special characteristics of monotheism and universality of knowledge as the content of education (curriculum), Akhlaqul karimah as the basis for educational goals, affective intelligence (attitude), cognitive (brain) and psychomotor (motion) as a development step, so as to avoid fatalism and ambivalence. In the study of epistemology, it gives birth to a clear concept of science to be realized into a comprehensive educational curriculum, without separating the empirical sciences (aqli) and the diniyah sciences (naqli). The axiological approach gives birth to views that are always in the value corridor. The operational appearance of education is not only used as a vehicle for the preservation (maintaining) of religious values, but more than that as a center and a means of developing knowledge, which is operated in an adapted, eclectic, cooperative, contextual, actual and universal manner and relies on intuition.

Full Text:



Hamzah, K. H. W. A. 1980. Mas Mansur: Pemikiran tentang Islam dan Muhammadiyah. Yogyakarta: Hanindita.

Hasymy. 1993. Sejarah Masuk dan Berkembangnya Islam di Indonesia. Jakarta :Al-Ma’arif.

Kartanegara, Mulyadhi .Desember 2018. Pemikiran Mistiko Filosofis (Aqlam Journal of Islam and Plurality). Sumenep: tskippgrisumenep.

_________ 2003. Menyibak Tirai Kejahilan: Pengantar Epistemologi Islam. Bandung: Mizan Pustaka.

Kattsoff , Louis O. 1996, Pengantar Filsafat. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.

Kontemplatif. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu.

Leaman, Oliver. 2001. Pengantar Filsafat Islam/Oliver Leaman;terj. M. Amin Abdullah. Jakarta: Rajawali.

Ma’arif Syafi’i. 1993. Peta Bumi Intelektualisme Islam di Indonesia. Artikel Scholar.

Nata, Abuddin. 2005. Tokoh-Tokoh Pembaharuan Pendidikan Islam di Indonesia. Jakarta : Raja Grafindo Persada.

Pranarka, A. M. W., 1987, Epistemologi Dasar Suatu Pengantar, Jakarta: CSIS.

Pranarka, A.M.W. 1987. Epistemologi Dasar: suatu pengantar. Jakarta: CSIS.

Rapar, Jan Hendrik, 1996, Philosopy, Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Samsudduha, H. 1999. Konflik dan Rekonsiliasi NU-Muhammadiyah: Sebuah Kajian

Suriasumantri, Jujun S. 1993. Filsafat Ilmu Sebuah Pengantar Populer. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

_________ 1999. Filsafat Ilmu, Sebuah Pengantar Populer. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

Yazdi, Muhammad Taqi Misbah. 2003. Daras Filsafat Islam. Bandung: Mizan.


Article Metrics

Abstract - 71 PDF - 91


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



Rausyan Fikr : Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pencerahan (p-ISSN: 1979-0074 e-ISSN: 2580-5940) is licensed under a   Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.     


Fakultas Agama Islam Universitas Muhammadiyah tangerang