THE HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF NEOLOGISM STUDIES: FROM TRADITIONAL APPROACHES TO MODERN LINGUISTIC TRENDS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31000/al-muyassar.v5i1.14868Keywords:
Neologisms, Linguistics, New Words, Language Evolution, LexicologyAbstract
This study examines the historical development of neologism studies through a historical-analytical approach that traces the movement from early descriptive and lexicographic observations to structural, generative, sociolinguistic, cognitive, and computational perspectives. Drawing on a purposive sample of classical and modern linguistic sources, the paper analyzes how the concept of neologism, its mechanisms of formation, and its diffusion have been understood across different stages of linguistic scholarship. The study argues that neologisms should not be treated merely as isolated new lexical items, but as indicators of broader processes of lexical change shaped by cultural, social, and technological transformation. The findings show that the study of neologisms has become increasingly interdisciplinary and that a comprehensive understanding of lexical innovation requires integrating historical, social, and digital perspectives.References
Aitchison, J. (2001). Language change: Progress or decay? (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Arnold, I. V. (1986). The English word. Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola.
Baroni, M., & Kilgarriff, A. (2006). Large linguistically-processed web corpora for multiple languages. Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 361–368.
Bauer, L. (2001). Morphological productivity. Cambridge University Press.
Baugh, A. C., & Cable, T. (2012). A history of the English language (6th ed.). Routledge.
Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 585–614.
Budagov, E. R. (1983). Language and style of modern English writers. Moscow: Nauka.
Camacho, L. (2024). Automating the proposition of neologisms for the Quechua language. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 54(3), 922–938. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100324000227
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.
Crystal, D. (2006). Words, words, words. Oxford University Press.
Crystal, D. (2011a). Internet linguistics: A student guide. London: Routledge.
Crystal, D. (2011b). The story of English in 100 words. Profile Books.
Crystal, D. (2016). Making sense: The glamorous story of English grammar. Oxford University Press.
De Saussure, F. (1916). Course in general linguistics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Friederici, A. D. (2011). The brain basis of language processing: From structure to function. Physiological Reviews, 91(4), 1357–1392.
Fromkin, V., Rodman, R., & Hyams, N. (2000). An introduction to language (7th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
Gérard, C. (2023). Discourse traditions and lexical innovation. In E. Winter-Froemel & Ã. S. Octavio de Toledo y Huerta (Eds.), Manual of discourse traditions in Romance (pp. 691–704). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110668636-034
Gries, S. T. (2009). Quantitative corpus linguistics with R: A practical introduction. Routledge.
Hack, V. G. (2003). New words and their typology. Moscow: Moscow State University Press.
Halperin, I. R. (1976). Lexical meaning and semantic structure of English words. Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola.
Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92(1–2), 101–144.
Irvine, J. T., & Gal, S. (2000). Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In P. V. Kroskrity (Ed.), Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities (pp. 35–84). School of American Research Press.
Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 350–377). MIT Press.
Labov, W. (1994). Principles of linguistic change: Volume 1. Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lakoff, G. (2008). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press.
McArthur, T. (1998). The English languages. Cambridge University Press.
Meshkova, O. D. (2004). Introduction to lexicology. Moscow: Flinta/Nauka.
Peeters, B. (2011). Cross-cultural communication and neologisms. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8(2), 209–231.
Plag, I. (2003). Word-formation in English. Cambridge University Press.
Sandow, R., Grieve, J., Stamp, R., & Schembri, A. (2026). Lexical variation and change: Integrating lexis into variationist sociolinguistics. Language Variation and Change. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394525000114
Vinogradov, V. V. (1977). Problems of literary language. Moscow: Nauka.
Voloshinsky, Y. K. (1995). Neologisms in modern English. Moscow: Nauka.
Wan, C., & Hou, S. (2025). Balancing net slang and standard Mandarin: Implications for education and linguistic sustainability. Discover Education, 4, 233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00642-z
Winter, B. (2016). Cognitive foundations of linguistic creativity. Language and Cognition, 8(2), 234–260.
Wu, Y. Q., & Sun, Q. (2024). ‘I am very emo’: Innovative use of emo in everyday communication among Chinese youngsters. English Today, 40(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078423000020
Würschinger, Q. (2021). Social networks of lexical innovation: Investigating the social dynamics of diffusion of neologisms on Twitter. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 4, 648583. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.648583
Yule, G. (2010). The study of language (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
ابن جني، Ø£. Ù. ع. (1952). الخصائص (ج. 1). القاهرة: دار الكتب المصرية.
الجابري، Ù…. ع. (2010). تكوين العقل العربي. بيروت: مركز دراسات Ø§Ù„ÙˆØØ¯Ø© العربية.
الخولي، م. م. (2018). اللغة العربية والتقدم التكنولوجي. عمّان: دار الشروق.
العبد، Ù…. (2018). العولمة واللغة. القاهرة: دار الÙكر العربي.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Online Learning in Educational Research is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Online Learning in Educational Research agree to the following terms:
Copyright Retention: Authors retain the copyright of their work without any restrictions.
Publishing Rights: Authors retain the right to publish and distribute their work without any restrictions.
License Agreement: By publishing with Online Learning in Educational Research, authors agree that their work will be licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA). This license allows others to share and adapt the work, provided that appropriate credit is given, any changes are indicated, and the new creations are licensed under the same terms.