Kajian Perpajakan UMKM Dalam Rangka Meminimalisasi Fenomena Bunching
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31000/bvaj.v6i2.6987Kata Kunci:
Penghindaran pajak, Perencanaan pajak, Perpajakan UMKMAbstrak
Fenomena bunching sendiri di dunia Internasional sering dilakukan oleh usaha kecil untuk menghindari batasan dalam kewajiban sebagai Pengusaha Kena Pajak dalam Pajak Pertambahan Nilai dan/atau batasan bagi penggunaan presumptive tax dalam pajak penghasilan. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkaji Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 23 Tahun 2018 dalam rangka meminimalisasi fenomena bunching. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kualitatif dengan pendekatan tematik analisis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penghindaran pajak merupakan salah satu upaya yang dapat dilakukan oleh wajib pajak untuk dapat meminimalisasi pembayaran pajak dengan cara memanfaatkan celah (loophole) yang ada dalam peraturan perundang-undangan. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 23 Tahun 2018 merupakan ketentuan yang memberikan kemudahan bagi wajib pajak untuk dapat memenuhi kewajiban pajaknya. Namun demikian, penerapan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 23 Tahun 2018 dapat dimanfaatkan oleh wajib pajak untuk meminimalisasi beban pajak yang harus dibayar. Penelitian ini memberikan dua rekomendasi penting, yaitu: pengaturan lebih lanjut terkait operasional secara komersial, dan ketentuan mengenai pekerjaan bebas.Referensi
Adams, C., & Webley, P. (2001). Small business owners’ attitudes on VAT compliancein the UK. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22, 195–216. www.elsevier.com/locate/joep
Bastani, S., & Selin, H. (2014). Bunching and non-bunching at kink points of the Swedish tax schedule. Journal of Public Economics, 109, 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.09.010
Candela, M. A. (2013). Size-Dependent Policies and Firm Behavior.
Castleberry, A., & Nolen, A. (2018). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds? Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10(6), 807–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.019
Gebresilasse, M. M., & Sow, S. (2015). Firm Response to VAT Registration Threshold in Ethiopia. http://www.columbia.edu/~ss3721/research.html
Hanlon, M., & Heitzman, S. (2010). A Review of Tax Research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2–3), 127–178. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1476561
Harju, J., & Matikka, T. (2016). The elasticity of taxable income and income-shifting: what is “real†and what is not? International Tax and Public Finance, 23(4), 640–669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-016-9393-4
Harju, J., Matikka, T., & Rauhanen, T. (2016). The Effects of Size-Based Regulation on Small Firms: Evidence from Vat Threshold. VATT Institute for Economic Research Working Papers. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2795920
Heide, J. C., & Aardal, K. Ø. (2017). Size management at regulatory thresholds by Norwegian companies. BI Norwegian Business School.
Hidayat, H., & Wijaya, S. (2022). Pengaruh Manajemen Laba dan Transfer Pricing terhadap Penghindaran Pajak. Bina Ekonomi, 25(2), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.26593/be.v25i2.5331.61-79
Ichikawa, T., & Onji, K. (2019). Bunching of Small Businesses at the Value-AddedTax Threshold in Japan: Lessons for the 2019 Tax Hike (No. 19-10).
Irawan, F. (2022). Riset Kuantitatif Dan Kualitatif Penghindaran Pajak: Metode Apa Yang Tepat Untuk Indonesia. Jurnalku, 2(1), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.54957/jurnalku.v2i1.128
Irawan, F., & Afif, A. R. (2020). Does firms’ life cycle influence tax avoidance? Evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 14(1), 1211–1229.
Irawan, F., & Erdika, F. A. (2021). Analisis atas Penerapan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 23 Tahun 2018. Jurnal Pajak Indonesia, 5(1), 57–66.
Irawan, F., & Turwanto. (2020). The Effect of Tax Avoidance on Firm Value with Tax Risk as Moderating Variable. Test Engineering and Management, 83, 9697–9707.
Kanbur, R., & Keen, M. (2014). Thresholds, informality, and partitions of compliance. International Tax and Public Finance, 21(4), 536–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-014-9314-3
Kementerian Keuangan. (2019, February 25). Mengenal Rasio Pajak Indonesia. Https://Www.Kemenkeu.Go.Id/Publikasi/Berita/Mengenal-Rasio-Pajak-Indonesia/.
Kleven, H. J. (2016). Bunching. Annual Review of Economics, 8(1), 435–464. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015234
Kou, E., Sun, Y., & Yue, L. (2021). The response of small firms to VAT thresholds: evidence from China. Applied Economics Letters, 28(17), 1526–1530. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1830931
le Maire, D., & Schjerning, B. (2013). Tax bunching, income shifting and self-employment. Journal of Public Economics, 107, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.08.002
Li, L., Liu, K. Z., Nie, Z., & Xi, T. (2021). Evading by any means? VAT enforcement and payroll tax evasion in China. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 185, 770–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.10.012
Liu, L., & Lockwood, B. (2015). VAT notches. Annual Conference on Taxation and Minutes of the Annual Meeting of the National Tax Association, 1–51.
Liu, L., Lockwood, B., Almunia, M., & Tam, E. H. F. (2019). VAT Notches, Voluntary Registration, and Bunching: Theory and UK Evidence.
Liu, L., Lockwood, B., Almunia, M., & Tam, E. H. F. (2021). VAT Notches, Voluntary Registration, and Bunching: Theory and U.K. Evidence. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 103(1), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00884
Luksic, J., & Mittal, S. (2019). Red Tape? The Revenue Impact of the VAT Filing Thresholds.
Mccormack, C. (2004). Storying stories: a narrative approach to in-depth interview conversations. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 7(3), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570210166382
Muthitacharoen, A., Wanichthaworn, W., & Burong, T. (2021). VAT threshold and small business behavior: evidence from Thai tax returns. International Tax and Public Finance, 28(5), 1242–1275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-021-09672-3
Nurfauzi, E., Nuryakin, C., & Putra, B. (2019). Firms Bunching Response to Indonesian Income Tax Threshold. JEJAK Journal of Economics and Policy, 12(1), 153–167.
OECD. (2020). Revenue Statistics in Asian and Pacific Economies.
Onji, K. (2009). The response of firms to eligibility thresholds: Evidence from the Japanese value-added tax. Journal of Public Economics, 93(5–6), 766–775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.12.003
Sabil, Pujiwidodo, D., & Lestiningsih, A. S. (2018). Pengaruh e-SPT Pajak Penghasilan dan Pemahaman Pajak terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak. Jurnal SIKAP, 2(2), 122–135.
Saez, E. (2010). Do taxpayers bunch at kink points? American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2(3), 180–212. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.2.3.180
Sukaryo, & Oktavia. (2016). Analisis Penerapan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 46 Tahun 2013 Terhadap Beban Pajak Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi UMKM Di Indonesia Dengan Menggunakan Skema Gain/Loss. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 12(2), 128–144.
Suyani, E.-. (2017). Analisis Skema Presumptive Untuk Penghitungan Pajak Penghasilan Wajib Pajak UMKM Di Indonesia. Info Artha, 1(2), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.31092/jia.v1i2.132
Taqiyyuddiin, M. H., & Wijaya, S. (2021). Zero Exemption Threhold for Corporation as an Alternative to Increase VAT Revenue. Accounting Research Journal of Sutaatmadja (ACCRUALS, 5(2), 81–106. https://doi.org/10.35310/accruals.v5i02.865
Thuronyi, V. (2003). Comparative Tax Law. Kluwer Law International.
Thuronyi, V. (2005). Presumptive Taxation of the Hard-to-Tax (pp. 101–120). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0573-8555(04)68805-5
Tsubasa, Arudchelvan, M., & Onji, K. (2019). Bunching of Small Businesses at the Value-AddedTax Threshold in Japan: Lessons for the 2019 Tax Hike (pp. 1–31). Osaka University.
Waseem, M. (2022). The Role of Withholding in the Self-Enforcement of a Value-Added Tax: Evidence from Pakistan. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 104(2), 336–354. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00959
Wijaya, S., & Arumningtias, D. (2021). Preventing The Potential Tax Avoidancein Government Regulation Of The Republic Of Indonesia Number 23 Of 2018. Multicultural Education, 7(1), 288–301.
Wijaya, S., & Setiawan, A. (2021). Potensi Tax Avoidance terhadap Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 23 Tahun 2018 oleh Wajib Pajak Perseroan Terbatas. Owner: Riset & Jurnal Akuntansi, 5(2), 407–416.
Yasuda, T. (2005). Firm Growth, Size, Age and Behavior in Japanese Manufacturing. Small Business Economics, 24(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-7568-y
Zaki, F., Ginting, B., Devi, T. K., & Bariah, C. (2019). Analisis Hukum Terhadap Tindakan Penghindaran Pajak (Tax Avoidance) Yang Dilakukan Oleh Perusahaan Berdasarkan Hukum Pajak Di Indonesia. USU LAW JOURNAL, 7(6), 1–15.
Unduhan
File Tambahan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
pernyataan bahwa pemegang hak artikel
Authors who publish with International Journal of Advances in Intelligent Informatics agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the International Journal of Advances in Intelligent Informatics right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in International Journal of Advances in Intelligent Informatics. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in International Journal of Advances in Intelligent Informatics. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
