DETERMINANT AUDIT FACTOR AND ACCEPTANCE OF GOING CONCERN OPINIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31000/competitive.v9i2.12917Keywords:
Auditor switching, Financial distress, Opinion going concern, Previous year’s opinion.Abstract
This study aims to empirically test the effect of financial distress, auditor switching, and previous year's audit opinion on the receiving of going concern opinion. This study uses a purposive sampling technique with a sample size of 138 companies. Secondary data in the form of financial reports of property and real estate companies listed on the indonesia stock exchange in 2021-2022 are used as data sources. The data analysis technique is logistic regression. the results of this study indicate that the first hypothesis was rejected, with the variable financial distress having no effect on the variable of accepting the going concern audit opinion. the second hypothesis was rejected, with the auditor switching variable having no effect on the variable of accepting audit opinion going concern. the third hypothesis was accepted, with the previous year's audit opinion variable influencing the variable of receiving audit opinion going concern.
Â
References
S. Sih Kusumawhardany and D. Adelia, “Debt Default, Ukuran Perusahaan Dan Disclosure Laporan Keuangan Terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern,†Account, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1891–1899, 2023, doi: 10.32722/account.v10i1.5394.
Syahputra and Yahya, “Pengaruh Audit Tenure, Audit Delay, dan Opinion Shopping Terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2013-2015,†J. Ilm. Mhs. Ekon. Akunt., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 2–9, 2007.
H. D. Sarra, S. Alamsyah, and R. Kardiyana, “Pengaruh Reputasi Auditor, Ukuran Perusahaan,Audit Tenure dan Financial Distress TerhadapPemberian Opini Audit Going Concern PadaPerusahaan Sektor Aneka Industri Yang Terdaftardi Bursa Efek Indonesia (Bei) Periode 2012-2016,†J. Akunt. dan Keuang., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 40–60, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.umt.ac.id/index.php/jceb/article/viewFile/3104/1904
M. G. W. Setiadamayanthi, Ni Luh Ayu, “Pengaruh Auditor Switching Dan Financial Distress Pada Opini Audit Going Concern,†E-Jurnal Akunt., 2016.
E. D. Laksmiati and S. Atiningsih, “Pengaruh Auditor Switching, Reputasi Kap DanFinancial Distress Terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern,†Fokus Ekon., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 45–61, 2018.
N. L. P. Widhiastuti and Putu Diah Kumalasari, “Opini Audit Going Concern Dan Faktor-Faktor Penyebabnya,†Akurasi J. Stud. Akunt. dan Keuang., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 121–138, 2022, doi: 10.29303/akurasi.v5i1.152.
H. Budiantoro, F. A. Nathania, and K. Lapae, “Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan, Opini Audit Tahun Sebelumnya, Debt Default dan Opinion Shopping Terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern,†Owner, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 3251–3260, 2022, doi: 10.33395/owner.v6i3.1043.
C. D. Taufan, & Wenny, “Pengaruh Ukuran KAP, Financial distress, dan Opini Tahun Sebelumnya terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern.,†J. Ilm. Ekon. dan Bisnis Univ. Multi Data Palembang., 2022.
R. Safriliana and S. Muawanah, “Faktor yang Memengaruhi Auditor Switching di Indonesia,†J. Akunt. Aktual, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 234–240, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.17977/um004v5i32019p234.
R. Fajrillah and I. R. Lestari, “Pengaruh Financial Distress, Opinion Shopping, Debt Default Dan Komite Audit Terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern,†J. Akuntansi, Keuangan, Perpajak. dan Tata Kelola Perusah., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 264–273, 2023, doi: 10.59407/jakpt.v1i2.206.
G. A. Damanhuri and D. P. Pande, “Pengaruh Financial Distress, Total Asset Turnover, dan Audit Tenure pada Pemberian Opini Going Concern,†E-Jurnal Akunt., vol. 30, no. 9, p. 2392, 2020.
T. Amelia, “Pengaruh Financial Distress, Debt Default Dan Opini Audit Tahun Sebelumnya Terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern,†J. Bina Bangsa Ekon., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 429–441, 2022, doi: 10.46306/jbbe.v15i2.177.
N. P. A. Rizky Pradnyawati, I. M. Wianto Putra, and N. P. Riasning, “Pengaruh Financial Distress, Audit Delay, Pergantian Manajemen Dan Opini Going Concern Terhadap Auditor Switching Studi Kasus Pada Perusahaan Sektor Keuangan Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2014-2018,†J. Ris. Akunt. Warmadewa, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 17–26, 2020, doi: 10.22225/jraw.1.2.1836.17-26.
A. J. Ihyaul Ulum, Motodologi Penelitian Akuntansi - Klinik Skripsi Edisi 2. Malang, 2016.
Junaidi and J. Hartono, “Non-Financial Factors in the Going-Concern Opinion,†J. Indones. Econ. Bus., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 369–378, 2010.
E. R. Sari and M. R. Yulianto, “Akurasi Pengukuran Financial Distress Menggunakan Metode Springate dan Zmijewski pada Perusahaan Property dan Real Estate di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2013-2015,†J. Manaj. dan Bisnis Indones., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 276–285, 2018, doi: 10.31843/jmbi.v5i2.167.
E. Winarso and T. C. J. A. Edison, “Perbandingan Analisis Model Zâ€-Score Altman Modifikasi, Model X-Score Zmijewski, Model G-Score Grover, Dan Model S-Score Springate Untuk Menganalisis Ketepatan Prediksi Kebangkrutan,†J. Accounting, Financ. Taxation, Audit., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–13, 2020, doi: 10.28932/jafta.v1i2.2451.
T. Sihombing and W. Apriliani, “Pengaruh Opinion Shopping, Audit Fee Dan Financial Distress Terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern,†Jurakunman (Jurnal Akunt. dan Manajemen), vol. 17, no. 2, p. 189, 2024, doi: 10.48042/jurakunman.v17i2.331.
A. Ramadhany, “Analisis Eaktor-Eaktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penerimaan Opini Going Concern Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Mengalami Financial Distress Di Bursa Efek Jakarta,†2004.
Creswell, Neuman, and Field, “Statistik Deskriptif dalam Penulisan Kualitatif,†Komunika, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 342–362, 2019.
& F. Utami, W. I., Khikmah, S. N., “Opini Going Concern: Dampak Ukuran Perusahaan, Financial Distress, Repurtasi auditor dan Opini Audit Tahun Sebelumnya,†p. 59, 2021.
T. R. K. Sihombing and M. Amirya, “Determinan Opini Audit Going Concern. Tema (Jurnal Tera Ilmu Akuntan-si,†TEMA (Tera Ilmu Akuntansi), vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2023.
S. Y. Sari and D. N. Rahmatika, “Determinan Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern pada Perusahaan Property dan Real Estate,†J. Kaji. Akunt., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2017, doi: 10.33603/jka.v1i1.507.
S. C. I. Kesumojati, T. Widyastuti, and Darmansyah, “Sister Clara Islamy Kesumojati , dkk . Pengaruh Kualitas Audit , Financial Distress , Debt Default Terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern E-ISSN 2502-4159,†J. Ilm. Akunt. Fak. Ekon., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 62–76, 2017.
R. herina Situngkir and P. Sembiring, “Analisis Regresi Logistik untuk Menentukan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Kabupaten/Kota di Pulau Nias,†FARABI J. Mat. dan Pendidik. Mat., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 25–31, 2023, doi: 10.47662/farabi.v6i1.432.
“Ketahui Apa itu Regresi Logistik dan Jenisnya,†Coding Studio Team. Accessed: Oct. 14, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://codingstudio.id/blog/regresi-logistik/
T. Citradi, “Penjualan Properti Drop, Harga Rumah Naik karena Bunga Tinggi,†CNBC Indonesia. Accessed: Oct. 14, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/market/20200212115217-17-137238/penjualan-properti-drop-harga-rumah-naik-karena-bunga-tinggi
T. N. N. A. Santoso. Budi Fajar, “Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan, Audit Lag, dan Financial Distress terhadap OPini Audit Going Concern,†no. Isa 570, pp. 1–25.
A. Nurbaiti and E. Diva Vania, “Analysis Of The Influence Of Sustainability Reporting, Auditor Switching, And Good Corporate Governance On Going Concern Audit Opinion,†J. Indones. Sos. Teknol., vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 1895–1904, 2023, doi: 10.59141/jist.v4i11.782.
A. A. Suharto and Majidah, “Pengaruh Debt Default, Audit Tenure, Opinion Shopping, dan Opini Audit Tahun Sebelumnya Terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern ( Studi Pada Perusahaan Sektor Pertambangan Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Pada Tahun 2013 – 2017 ),†e-Proceeding Manag., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 702–710, 2020.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Â
The authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
Â
The authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Lisensi Atribusi Creative Commons (CC BY) that allows others to share the work with acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and its initial publication in this journal.
Â
Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (for example, posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Â
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (for example, in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) prior to and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (see The Pengaruh Akses Terbuka ).
Â
The Competitive Journal of Accounting and Finance applies the CC-BY-SA license or its equivalent as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly works.
Â
In developing strategies and setting priorities, the Competitive Journal of Accounting and Finance of Muhammadiyah University of Tangerang recognizes that free access is better than paid access, gratis access is better than restricted access, and libre under CC-BY-SA or its equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We must achieve what we can when we can. We must not delay achieving freedom in order to reach libre, and we must not stop at freedom when we can achieve libre.