JMB : Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis

Articles

Vol. 6 No. 2 (2017): JMB : Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis

PERBANDINGAN KINERJA NPL SERTA FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31000/jmb.v6i2.1561
Submitted
May 3, 2019
Published
May 3, 2019

Abstract

Non performing loans are defined as risks associated with the likelihood
of failure of the client to pay its obligations or the risk that the debtor
can not repay the debt. NPLs reflect credit risk, the smaller the NPL the
less the credit risk borne by the bank. In order for the bank's value to
this ratio to be good, Bank Indonesia sets the net NPL ratio below 5%.
In addition to domestic and foreign economic problems, it turns out that
some of the financial ratios held by the Bank can give effect to the
change in NPL value at Commercial Banks. This study aims to analyze
the influence of liquidity and solvency ratios (LDR, LAR and DER), the
amount of credit, inflation rate and BI Rate to the ratio of nonperforming
loans (NPL) to commercial banks and simultaneously
analyze the comparison of NPL Performance in state-owned Commercial
Banks (BUMN) with Private Banks domestic (BSDN).

References

  1. Ahmad, R. Ariff, M. & Skully, M.J 2008 The
  2. Determinant of Bank Capital Ratios
  3. in aDeveloping Economy. Asia-Pasific
  4. Financial Markets, 255 - 272
  5. Ali et al. 2011.Bank Specific and
  6. Macroeconomic Indicators of
  7. Profitability–EmpiricalEvidence
  8. from the Commercial Bank of
  9. Pakistan. International Journal of
  10. Business and Social Science, 235-242
  11. Alkhatib, Akram 2012.Financial
  12. Performance of Palestinian
  13. Commercial Banks. International
  14. Journal of Business and Social Science,
  15. – 184
  16. Gujarati, Damodar N. 2004. Basic
  17. Econometrics.Forth Edition. E-Book
  18. Hasan et al. 2013.The Impact of
  19. Macroeconomic and Bank Specific
  20. Components on The Return of
  21. Equity. Interdisciplinary Journal of
  22. Contemporary Research in Business,
  23. - 126
  24. Jacob, Jeremiah Kevin Denis. 2013. Analisis
  25. Laporan Keuangan Dengan
  26. Menggunakan Metode Camel Untuk
  27. Menilai Tingkat Kesehatan
  28. Perbankan, EMBA, 691-700
  29. Kumbirai, Mabwe & Robert Webb 2010.A
  30. Financial Ratio Analysis of
  31. Commercial Bank Performance in
  32. South Africa. African Review of
  33. Economic and Finance, 30 – 53
  34. Margaretha, Farah & Diana Setianingrum
  35. Pengaruh Resiko, Kualitas
  36. Manajemen, Ukuran dan Likuiditas
  37. Bank terhadap Capital Adequacy
  38. Ratio Bank-Bank yang Terdaftar di
  39. BursaEfek Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi
  40. dan Keuangan, 47 - 56
  41. Messai, S. A., and Jouini, F. 2013. Micro and
  42. Macro Determinants of Non-
  43. Performing Loans. International
  44. Journal of Economics and Financial Issues,
  45. -860.
  46. Meka, Alvin. 2015. Non-Performing Loanstingking
  47. and going out of The
  48. Traditional Box.
  49. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2612905
  50. Myers, Stewart C. 1989. Signaling and
  51. Accounting Information. NBER
  52. Working Paper Series,
  53. http://www.nber.org.
  54. Narasimhan, V.K & Mridula Goel. 2013.
  55. Capital Adequacy and its Relevance
  56. to The IndianBanking Sector: A
  57. Study of Four Indian Banks.
  58. International Reseach Journal of Social
  59. Sciences, 1 - 5
  60. Sahara, Ayu Yanita. 2013. Analisis Pengaruh
  61. Inflasi, Suku Bunga BI, dan Produk
  62. Domestik Bruto Terhadap Return
  63. On Asset (ROA) Bank Syariah di
  64. Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, 149 -
  66. Samad, A. 2004.Bahrain Commercial Bank’s
  67. Performance during 1994 – 2001.
  68. Credit and Financial Management Review,
  69. - 40
  70. Sawir, 2005.Analisis Kinerja Keuangan dan
  71. Perencanaan Keuangan Perusahaan.
  72. PT. GramediaPustaka Utama, Jakarta.
  73. Sinungan, Muchdarsyah, 1992. Bank Dan
  74. Perbankan-Manajemen, Jakarta:
  75. Rineka Cipta
  76. Bank Indonesia 2012. Laporan Keuangan
  77. Publikasi Bank Syariah.
  78. Peraturan Bank Indonesia
  79. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.