Beralih ke menu navigasi utama Beralih ke bagian utama Beralih ke bagian footer website

Articles

Vol 7 No 1 (2018): JMB : Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis

ANALISIS KEBERLANJUTAN USAHA UMKM DI PROPINSI BANTEN

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31000/jmb.v7i1.1566
Telah diserahkan
Mei 3, 2019
Diterbitkan
Mei 3, 2019

Abstrak

This study aims to analyze the variables of strategy implementation of
generic learning strategies to the sustainability variables of SMEs
business, this study provides a good understanding of theoretical and
managerial steps that are not done by entrepreneurs of SMEs. The
success of the business will be ensured to survive in the midst of
industrial processing and weakening the economy both regionally and
globally. Example of study 170 SMEs using SME cluster system in the
processing industry in Banten Province. Data processing techniques using
questionnaires. To test the predefined relationship model, the researcher
uses a 23.00 analysis tool that can be used together (AMOS). The
variables generated from the generic strategies of competitive strategies
against the significant variables of MSME sustainability and have a
positive effect on the sustainability of SMEs business. This research can
give meaning for the sustainability of UMKM business in order to survive
in global competition with big industry today and future

Referensi

  1. . Lembaga Pengembangan Perbankan
  2. Indonesia dan Bank Indonesia, 2015,
  3. Profil Bisnis Usaha Mikro Kecil dan
  4. Menengah (UMKM), diakses
  5. http://www.bi.go.id/id/umkm/ pada Tanggal
  6. Februari 2017
  7. Rencana Strategis Kementrian Koperasi
  8. dan Usaha Kecil dan Menengah Repubilk
  9. IndonesiaTahun 2012-2014
  10. Boediono, 1999. Teori Pertumbuhan
  11. Ekonomi, Seri Sinopsis Pengantar
  12. Ilmu ekonomi, Edisi 1, Cetakan Ke
  13. BPFE.Jogyakarta.
  14. Rahmana, Arif, 2009, Peranan
  15. Teknologi Informasi Dalam
  16. peningkatan Daya Saing Usaha Kecil
  17. Menengah.Seminar Nasional Aplikasi
  18. Teknologi Informasi (SNATI 2009), ISSN:
  19. -5022, Yogyakarta
  20. M. Makhija, 2003, Comparing the
  21. resource-based and market-based
  22. view of the firm: Empirical evidence
  23. from Czech privatization, Strategic
  24. Management Journal, 24: 433–451; P.
  25. L. Yeoh & K. Roth, 1999, An
  26. empirical analysis of sustained
  27. advantage in the U.S.
  28. pharmaceutical industry: Impact of
  29. firm resources and capabilities, Strategic
  30. Management Journal, 20: 637–653
  31. Barney, J. 1991. Firm esources and
  32. Sustained Competetive Advantage.
  33. Dalam A.A Thompson & A.J Sricland
  34. III. Crafting and Implementing
  35. Strategy New York: Irwin & McGraw
  36. Hill Book Co.
  37. H. Perzon, Assessing the Readiness
  38. for Implementing e-CRM in B2B
  39. Markets, Master Thesis, Lulea
  40. University of Technology (2008)
  41. P.L. Kam WA. The critical success
  42. factors of customer relationship
  43. management (CRM) technological
  44. initiatives, Master’s Thesis, Concordia
  45. University (2001).
  46. Ferdinand, Augusty, 2003, Suistainable
  47. Competitive Adventage, Badan
  48. penerbit universitas Dipenogoro,
  49. semarang.
  50. Porter, Michael E., 1994. Keunggulan
  51. Bersaing, Bina Rupa Aksara, Jakarta.
  52. Hitt, Ireland (2007), Strategic
  53. Management Competitiveness And
  54. Globalization Thomson Higher
  55. Education 5191 Natorp Boulevard
  56. Mason, OH 45040 USA. Library of
  57. Congress Control Number: 2005911294
  58. Robinson, Sandra. L., & Bennett, Rebecca
  59. J. 1995. A typology of deviant
  60. workplace behaviors: A
  61. multidimensional scaling
  62. study.Academy of Management Journal,
  63. (2): 555–572
  64. Bruce A.McDaniel. 2005. A
  65. Contemporary View of Joseph A.
  66. Schumpeter’s Theory of the
  67. Kazem Chaharbaghi and Richard Lynch,
  68. , Sustainable competitive
  69. dvantage: towards a dynamic
  70. resource-based strategy
  71. Management Decision 37/1 [1999]
  72. –50

##plugins.themes.immersion.displayStats.downloads##

##plugins.themes.immersion.displayStats.noStats##