Enforcement of Reduced Punishment for Perpetrators of Terrorism Crimes against Death Penalty Punishment
Abstract
Terrorism is one of the crimes that fall under the death penalty category. The threat of the death penalty for perpetrators of criminal acts of terrorism as a tool to enforce the law. However, there are conflicting rules between the death penalty and human rights. So, can the death penalty be changed to life imprisonment? This research aimed to analyse whether reducing punishment for those convicted of terrorism could be enforced. This research uses a normative research method with a statutory, conceptual, and case approach through judge decisions relating to terrorism cases. The implementation of Law Number 5 of 2018 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Terrorism considers acts of terrorism to be a threat to ideology and national security. The death penalty is imposed as a last resort to protect society and can be carried out after a prisoner's request for pardon is rejected by the President. Legal efforts that can be taken to reduce terrorism punishment range from filing an appeal, cassation, and judicial review to the final application to ask for forgiveness from the President, who is the convict's only hope of reducing the sentence to obtain human rights protection and legal relief.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Afifah, H. (2018). Penjatuhan Pidana Mati Terhadap Teroris Dalam Pasal 6 Undang-Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2003 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Terorisme Perspektif Hukum Islan.
Arief, B. N. (2010). Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Astri Yulianti, Ade Mahmud, & Izadi, F. F. (2022). Pemidanaan bagi Pelaku Terorisme dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Positif dan Hukum Pidana Islam. Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, 101–106. https://doi.org/10.29313/jrih.v2i2.1456
Biro humas, H. dan K. (2022). Wamenkumham: Hukuman Mati Merupakan Special Punishment”, www.kemenkumham.go.id, 28 Maret 2022, p.1,. Https://Kemenkumham.Go.Id/, p. 1. Retrieved from https://kemenkumham.go.id/berita-utama/wamenkumham-hukuman-mati-merupakan-special-punishment
Chandrawati, I. G. A. . F. (2020). Pidana Penjara Seumur Hidup Atau Pidana Mati (Konfigurasi Dilematis Antara Hukum Dan Kemanusiaan). Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum, 8(12), 1984. https://doi.org/10.24843/ks.2020.v08.i12.p15
Fardha, K. V. (2023). Perkembangan Teori-Teori Hukum Pidana. INNOVATIVE: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(5), 3987.
Fuji Lestari, Erdianto Effendi, and W. E. (2019). TINJAUAN YURIDIS PIDANA MATI TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA TERORISME PERSFEKTIF HAK ASASI MANUSIA. Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Hukum, 6(2), 1–15.
Khamdan, M., Kunci, K., Radikalisasi, :, & Damai, B. (2015). Rethinking Deradikalisasi: Konstruksi Bina Damai Penanganan Terorisme. Addin, 9(1), 181–204.
Mareta, J. (2018). REHABILITASI DALAM UPAYA DERADIKALISASI DALAM NARAPIDANA TERORISME. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 47(4), 339. https://doi.org/10.14710/jis.%v.%i.%Y.527-539
Marzuki, P. M. (2010). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta - Indonesia: Kencana Prenada Media Grup.
Nimerodi Gulo, A. K. M. (2018). DISPARITAS DALAM PENJATUHAN PIDANA. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 47(3), 225.
Nuruzzaman, M. (2018). TERORISME DAN MEDIA SOSIAL SISI GELAP BERKEMBANGNYA TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI KOMUNIKASI. Syntax Literate : Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 3(9), 68. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/ASUS/Downloads/460-Article Text-1208-1-10-20180927.htm
Puro, D. R., Sudarmanto, K., & Arifin, Z. (2023). Optimalisasi Pelaksanaan Pidana Mati Dalam Mewujudkan Efek Jera Pada Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana pelaku tindak pidana pembunuhan memiliki beberapa bentuk atau kualifikasi. JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW, 6(35), 8–12.
Rizkiansyah, M. (2013). MAKNA IDEOLOGI DAN BENTUK PROPAGANDA MEDIA ( Studi Semiotika Barthes media Eramuslim dan National Israel Terhadap Kasus Mavi Marmara ). Communication, 2(1), 545–555. Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/ALBICEE/lembar-observasi-siswa-50178674
Rozaq, M. (2023). Kebijakan Kriminal Dalam Rangka Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Terorisme Di Indonesia. 6(2), 4985–4993.
Syafiq, M. (2021). Proses Perubahan Diri Seorang Teroris menjadi Aktivis Perdamaian. Jurnal Ilmiah Psyche, 15(2), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.33557/jpsyche.v15i2.1564
Tambajong, M., Sondakh, D. K. G., & Lengkong, N. L. (2021). Analisis Hukum Tentang Penerapan Hukuman Mati Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Terorisme Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia Di Indonesia. Lex Administratum, IX(8).
Teguh Prasetyo, J. kameo. (2020). PERADILAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA: SUATU PERSPEKTIF MENURUT JURISPRUDENCE KEADILAN BERMARTABAT Teguh Prasetyo 1 , Jeferson Kameo 2. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 15(2), 143–154.
Widayati, L. S. (2017). Pidana Mati Dalam Ruu Kuhp: Perlukah Diatur Sebagai Pidana Yang Bersifat Khusus?(Death Penalty In The Bill Of Criminal Code: Should Regulated As A Special Punishment?). Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan, 7(2), 167–194.
Yunus, A. F. (2017). Radikalisme, Liberalisme dan Terorisme: Pengaruhnya Terhadap Agama Islam. Jurnal Online Studi Al-Qur An, 13(1), 76–94. https://doi.org/10.21009/jsq.013.1.06
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/jhr.v12i1.10361
Article Metrics
Abstract - 18 PDF - 30Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Indexed by:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.