CRIMINAL LIABILITY FOR PERPETRATORS THREATENING THE SPREAD OF IMMORAL VIDEOS ON SOCIAL MEDIA

Ismail Koto, Ramlan Ramlan, Tengku Erwin Syahbana, Rachmad Abduh, Ibrahim Nainggolan

Abstract


The rapid development of information and communication technology has affected human development throughout the world. Technological advances in the digitalization era have been made by humans to facilitate human activities such as accessing information and knowledge so that humans can do many things in a short time. Cases of immoral crimes almost always occur in Indonesia and attract public attention. The level of immoral crimes in Indonesia is very high and varied. The perpetrators of immoral crimes also range from children, adults, to the elderly, even early childhood. Two components consist of immoral crimes: norms of decency and norms of decency. In order to function as a basis for providing a sense of justice and legal certainty to the people of Indonesia, the norms of decency play a very important role. This research is normative legal research, namely legal research that places law as a building system of norms. Pornographic crimes that occurred in the Republic of Indonesia are clearly contrary to the principles held by Indonesian society. Pornography crimes often cause concern for the community. The Electronic Information and Transaction Law is a provision that applies to anyone who commits legal acts whether within the scope of Indonesian jurisdiction and/or outside Indonesian territory and causing harm to Indonesia's interests

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adami Chazawi dan Ardi Ferdian, 2015. Tindak Pidana Informasi & Elektronik (Penyerangan Terhadap Kepentingan Hukum Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik), Malang: Media Nusa Creative.

Donald A. Rumokoy dan Frans Maramis, 2016. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Hasbullah F. Sjawie, 2015. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.

Jonaedi Efendi dan Johnny Ibrahim, 2021. Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris, Jakarta: Kencana.

Koto, I., Lubis, T. H., & Sakinah, S. (2022). Provisions of Legal Protection for Terrorism Victim in Order to Realize Constitution Order. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi, 243-252.

Mukti Fajar dan Yulianto Achmad, 2019. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif & Empiris, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Nynda Fatmawati Octarina, 2018. Pidana Pemberitaan Media Sosial, Malang: Setara Press.

Rindiani Kurniawati A. Mulyadi. Rosalia Dika Agustanti. Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Penyebaran Konten Asusila. Jurnal: Humani (Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani). Vol 11. No. 1. Mei 2021.

Romli Atmasasmita, 2000. Perbandingan Hukum Pidana, Bandung: Manjar Maju.

Salim HS dan Erlies Septiana Nurbani, 2017. Penerapan Teori Hukum Pada Penelitian Tesis dan Disertasi, Jakarta: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.

Soerjono Soekanto, 2005. Pokok-Pokok Sosiologi Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2016 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik

Widyopramono, 2012. Kejahatan di Bidang Komputer, Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

Zainuddin Ali, 2019. Metode Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/jhr.v11i2.8952

Article Metrics

Abstract - 271 PDF - 174

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Indexed by:



Web Analytics Made Easy - StatCounter

View My Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.