Legal Protection Of Concurrent Creditors Due To Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations During The Covid-19 Pandemic

Muhammad Adli; Triono Eddy; Ramlan Ramlan

doi:10.31000/jhr.v12i1.8973

Legal Protection Of Concurrent Creditors Due To Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations During The Covid-19 Pandemic

Muhammad Adli, Triono Eddy, Ramlan Ramlan

Abstract

The rights of concurrent creditors in the decision to postpone debt payment obligations during the COVID-19 pandemic. To know and analyze the rights of concurrent creditors in determining the vote for extension and peace after the postponement of debt payment obligations during the COVID-19 pandemic. To find out and analyze the obstacles and legal protection efforts against concurrent creditors due to the postponement of debt payment obligations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Problem formulations for this journal are; How are the rights of concurrent creditors in the postponement of debt payment obligations during the Covid-19 pandemic?, How are the rights of concurrent creditors in determining the extension vote and peace after the postponement of debt payment obligations during the Covid-19 pandemic? and What are the obstacles and legal protection efforts against concurrent creditors due to the postponement of debt payment obligations during the COVID-19 pandemic? This research is normative legal research accompanied by supporting data. The research data was collected through a literature study. The analysis was carried out using qualitative methods. Based on the research results, it is concluded that: First, the rights of concurrent creditors in the decision to postpone debt payment obligations during the Covid-19 pandemic are based on the theory of positive law put forward by John Austin, namely in Article 222 paragraph (2) of Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations. Second, The rights of concurrent creditors in determining the extension vote and peace after the postponement of debt payment obligations during the Covid-19 pandemic. Third, Obstacles to legal protection of concurrent creditors due to the postponement of debt payment obligations during the Covid-19 pandemic, namely the absence of funds for the costs of managing and administering postponement of debt payment obligations, uncooperative bankrupt debtors, and debtors selling/hiding their assets before being declared bankrupt. Legal protection efforts against concurrent creditors due to the decision to postpone debt payment obligations.

Keywords: legal protection, concurrent creditors, postponement of debt payment obligations

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abdi, M. N, 2020. Krisis Ekonomi Global dari Dampak Penyebaran Virus Corona (Covid- 19). AkMen Jurnal Ilmiah.

Denis Keenan & Josephine Bisacre dalam Sutan Remy Sjahdeini, 2002. Hukum Kepailitan, Jakarta : PT. Pustaka Utama, Grafiti.

Eman Suparman, 2004. Pilihan Forum Arbitrase Dalam Sengketa Komersial Untuk Keadilan, PT. Tata Nusa, Jakarta.

Hasdi Hariyadi, Restrukturisasi Utang sebagai Pencegahan Kepailitan. SIGn Jurnal Hukum. Vol. 1, No.2. Maret 2020

I Made Pasek Diantha, 2018. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum, Kencana, Jakarta.

J. Satrio, Hukum Perikatan, 1993. Perikatan Pada Umumnya, Bandung : Alumni.

Junaedi, D, Salistia, F, 2020. Dampak Pandemi Covid-19 Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Negara-Negara Terdampak. Prosiding Simposium Nasional Keuangan Negara.

Koto, I., & Hanifah, I. (2023). Aspek Hukum Pelaksanaan Pekerjaan Pokok Oleh Tenaga Kerja Outsourcing Di Indonesia. Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum, 14(2).

Ridwan Khairandy, 2003. Itikad baik dalam kebebasan berkontrak, Jakarta: F.H, Pascasarjana UI.

S. Sastrawidjaya, 2006. Hukum Kepailitan dan PKPU, Bandung: Alumni.

Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji, 2013. Penelitian Hukum Normatif suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Radja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Tauratiya, Overmacht: Analisis Yuridis Penundaan Pelaksanaan Prestasi Akibat Pandemi Covid-19. Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan. Vol. 7, No. 1. 2020.

Thomas H. Jackson & Robert E. Scott, 1989 On the Nature of Bankruptcy: An Essay on Bankruptcy Sharing and the Creditors’ Bargain, 75 Va. L Rev. 155.

Werner F.Eble et.al. dalam Ridwan Khairandy lihat juga pendapat J. Satrio, 1995. Ketentuan pengaturan itikad baik merupakan ketentuan yang ditujukan kepada pengadilan, dalam bukunya Perikatan yang lahir dari Perjanjian, Buku II, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Zainuddin Ali, 2014. Metode Penelitian Hukum, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/jhr.v12i1.8973