Implications of Cancellation of Notification of An Appeal Decision Canceled By The Chairman of The Serang District Court
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31000/jhr.v12i1.9991Abstrak
As a case breaker, the judge is assisted by court officials in handling a case, both the Substitute Registrar who accompanies the judge at trial, as well as the Bailiff/Alternate Bailiff who carries out the duties of adjudication and plays an important role in the proceedings at the Court. Bailiffs in carrying out their duties often face several obstacles/obstacles. The most crucial obstacle is the delivery of relaas through the headman. Bailiff/Substitute Advocate in making notification of the decision if the residence or residence of the parties is known, the notification of the decision is delivered directly to the disputing parties (in person), the term in person can be extended again to include the next of kin in a straight line up and down below (parents and children) or husband/wife. If the residence or residence of the person is known but neither is he or his family, a letter of notification shall be submitted to the local headman/Village Head. Relaas Summons/Notifications (Summons of the parties and notification of either a decision or a reprimand), is a very important instrument in civil proceedings because without a relaas the judge's decision cannot be justified and is not based on law. This study aims to find out the procedures for submitting notifications of appeal decisions and the implications of canceling the minutes of notification of appeal decisions that were canceled by the head of the Serang District Court. This study uses a normative juridical legal research method with a statutory approach based on secondary data supported by primary data and analyzed using a qualitative juridical method. The result of this research is the cancellation of the minutes of notification of the appeal decision which was canceled by the head of the Serang District Court resulting in the minutes of notification of the contents of the decision having to be re-executed because they were not submitted legally and properly due to procedural-administrative errors. The cancellation of the minutes of decision notification is carried out to correct errors that have occurred in order to avoid the potential to hinder the process of implementing the contents of the decision at a later date.
Keywords: Implication, Cancellation, Minutes of Notification of DecisionReferensi
Cece Rukmana Ibrahim, Dilema Juru Sita Pengganti Dalam Penyampaian Relaas Panggilan, diakses pada https://www.pa-jakartaselatan.go.id/.
Elfas Yanuardi, Penafsiran Pasal 390 Ayat (1) HIR Terhadap Jaminan Keadilan Dalam Hukum Oleh Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, diakses pada https://pn-sumedang.go.id/.
HIR (Herzien Inlandsch Reglement).
R.Bg (Rechtreglement voor de Buitengewesten).
Sri Duta, Selayang Pandang “Sang Jurusitaâ€, diakses pada https://badilag.mahkamahagung.go.id/.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Umum.
Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.
Zainudin Ali, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2016
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
- The publisher of JHR (Jurnal Hukum Replik) is Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang
- The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.