Philosophical Reconstruction of the Concept of "Restoration of the Original State" in Article 79 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 20 of 2025 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code

Authors

  • Andrea Hynan Poeloengan Univeritas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta
  • Zulkarnain Koto Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kepolisian Perguruan Tinggi Ilmu Kepolisian
  • Ismail Koto Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31000/1zgrq813

Abstract

The development of the global criminal justice system shows a paradigm shift from retributive justice to restorative justice, which places restoration as the primary orientation in resolving criminal cases. In the Indonesian context, restorative values have been alive in the tradition of customary law and the philosophy of Pancasila, but were marginalized by colonial legal formalism. Legal reform through the New Criminal Procedure Code, specifically Article 79 paragraph (1) of Law Number 20 of 2025, reintroduces the concept of "restoring the original state" as an instrument for protecting human rights and substantive justice. The problem is, without a philosophical reconstruction based on Pancasila values, the concept of restoration has the potential to be reduced to a material compensation mechanism that opens up space for the practice of "transactions of impunity" and inequality in social justice. This research uses a normative juridical method with an approach to vertical and horizontal synchronization of legal norms and is reinforced by scenario planning within a foresight method framework to project the implications of the application of norms in a reductive manner. The research findings indicate that restoration to the original state must be interpreted as a multidimensional process encompassing the restoration of human dignity, social relational balance, and the state's responsibility to protect citizens' rights. A Pancasila-based philosophical reconstruction is necessary for the concept of restoration to function as an authentic instrument of restorative justice in the modern Indonesian criminal justice system.

Keywords: Philosophical Reconstruction, Restoration of the Original State, Article 79 Paragraph (1) of Law
Number 20 of 2025.

References

Asshiddiqie, J. (2012). Penegakan hukum dan perlindungan hak asasi manusia dalam negara hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 9(4), 1–22.

Atmasasmita, R. (2014). Sistem peradilan pidana kontemporer dan perlindungan hak asasi manusia. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 44(2), 145–160.

Indrajaya, N. (2026). Keadilan restoratif sebagai pergeseran paradigma dalam sistem hukum pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 19(3), 589–605.

Istiqamah, D. T. (2018). Konsep keadilan restoratif dalam hukum adat Indonesia dan penerapannya di Indonesia. Veritas et Justitia, 4(1).

Lasmadi, S. (2020). Keadilan restoratif sebagai alternatif penyelesaian perkara pidana dalam sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 11(2), 215–226.

Manan, B. (2009). Negara hukum dan konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 6(2), 1–16.

Marlina. (2009). Peradilan pidana anak di Indonesia: Pengembangan konsep diversi dan restorative justice. Jurnal Equality, 14(2), 65–78.

Maryanto. (2017). Overcrowding di lembaga pemasyarakatan sebagai dampak sistem pemidanaan di Indonesia. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 14(3), 321–334.

Suteki. (2013). Rekonstruksi politik hukum tentang hak menguasai negara atas sumber daya air berbasis nilai keadilan sosial. Jurnal Konstitusi, 10(2), 295–314.

Taqiuddin, H. U., & Risdiana, R. (2022). Penerapan keadilan restoratif dalam praktik ketatanegaraan. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan (JISIP), 6(1).

Yuliartini, N. P. R. (2015). Kedudukan korban kejahatan dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia berdasarkan KUHAP. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum, 1(1), 15–27.

Zaidan, M. A. (2016). Pembaruan hukum pidana dan perlindungan hak asasi manusia dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Rechts Vinding, 5(2), 275–290.

Zulfa, E. A. (2011). Pergeseran paradigma pemidanaan. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 41(2), 189–205.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-28