APAKAH ISI PROSPEKTUS MENENTUKAN KEBERHASILAN EQUITY CROWDFUNDING (ECF)?

Susana Diah Kusumaningrum, Tastaftiyan Risfandy

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis apakah isi prospektus berkaitan dengan keberhasilan online equity crowdfunding (ECF) di Indonesia. Peneliti menggunakan sampel pada platform 62 bisnis atau penerbit yang listing di platform Santara di tahun 2021. Teknik analisis yang digunakan di dalam penelitian ini adalah regresi berganda. Hasil pengujian menunjukkan bahwa deskripsi bisnis memiliki efek positif pada keberhasilan ECF, sedangkan jumlah gambar dalam prospektus memiliki efek negatif. Di sisi yang lain, penggunaan uang, status proyek, dan deskripsi risiko bisnis tidak berpengaruh pada keberhasilan ECF. Hasil penelitian ini menjadi rekomendasi bagi perusahaan yang ingin menampilkan profilnya di platform ECF untuk meningkatkan kualitas prospektusnya, terutama dalam deskripsi perusahaan di prospektus. Perusahaan juga harus berhati-hati dalam penggunaan gambar yang terlalu banyak di prospektus, karena hal tersebut dapat membuat hilangnya fokus calon investor saat membaca prospektus.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahlers, G. K. C., Cumming, D., Günther, C., & Schweizer, D. (2015). Signaling in equity crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(4), 955–980.

Allison, T. H., Davis, B. C., Short, J. C., & Webb, J. W. (2015). Crowdfunding in a prosocial microlending environment: Examining the role of intrinsic versus extrinsic cues. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(1), 53–73.

Anglin, A. H., Wolfe, M. T., Short, J. C., McKenny, A. F., & Pidduck, R. J. (2018). Narcissistic rhetoric and crowdfunding performance: A social role theory perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(6), 780–812.

Barbi, M., & Mattioli, S. (2019). Human capital, investor trust, and equity crowdfunding. Research in International Business and Finance, 49, 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.02.005

Belleflamme, P., Omrani, N., & Peitz, M. (2015). The economics of crowdfunding platforms. Information Economics and Policy, 33, 11–28.

Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2010). Signaling Theory: A Review and Assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310388419

Cumming, D., Hervé, F., Manthé, E., & Schwienbacher, A. (2020). Testing-the-waters policy with hypothetical investment: Evidence from equity crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 1042258720932522.

Davies, W. E., & Giovannetti, E. (2018). Signalling experience & reciprocity to temper asymmetric information in crowdfunding evidence from 10,000 projects. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 133, 118–131.

Kleinert, S., Volkmann, C., & Grünhagen, M. (2020). Third-party signals in equity crowdfunding: the role of prior financing. Small Business Economics, 54(1), 341–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0125-2

Koch, J.-A., & Cheng, Q. (2016). The role of qualitative success factors in the analysis of crowdfunding success: Evidence from Kickstarter.

Koch, J.-A., & Siering, M. (2015). Crowdfunding success factors: The characteristics of successfully funded projects on crowdfunding platforms.

Kunz, M. M., Bretschneider, U., Erler, M., & Leimeister, J. M. (2017). An empirical investigation of signaling in reward-based crowdfunding. Electronic Commerce Research, 17(3), 425–461.

Lagazio, C., & Querci, F. (2018). Exploring the multi-sided nature of crowdfunding campaign success. Journal of Business Research, 90, 318–324.

Lukkarinen, A., Teich, J. E., Wallenius, H., & Wallenius, J. (2016). Success drivers of online equity crowdfunding campaigns. Decision Support Systems, 87, 26–38.

Mollick, E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 1–16.

Parhankangas, A., & Renko, M. (2017). Linguistic style and crowdfunding success among social and commercial entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(2), 215–236.

Pitschner, S., & Pitschner-Finn, S. (2014). Non-profit differentials in crowd-based financing: Evidence from 50,000 campaigns. Economics Letters, 123(3), 391–394.

Ralcheva, A., & Roosenboom, P. (2020). Forecasting success in equity crowdfunding. Small Business Economics, 55(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00144-x

Sannajust, A., Roux, F., & Chaibi, A. (2014). Crowdfunding in France: a new revolution? Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 30(6), 1919–1928.

Skirnevskiy, V., Bendig, D., & Brettel, M. (2017). The influence of internal social capital on serial creators’ success in crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(2), 209–236.

Soppe, B., Pietraszkiewicz, A., Pershina, R., & Formanowicz, M. M. (2017). Mobilizing backers? Sustainability framing and success in crowdfunding.

Wei, Z., & Lin, M. (2013). Auction vs. posted-price: Market mechanism, lender behaviors, and transaction outcomes in online crowdfunding. Posted-Price: Market Mechanism, Lender Behaviors, and Transaction Outcomes in Online Crowd-Funding (September 1, 2013).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/sinamu.v4i1.7672

Article Metrics

Abstract - 337 PDF - 263

DOI (PDF): http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/sinamu.v4i1.7672.g3899

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Simposium Nasional Multidisiplin (SinaMu) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License . 

View MyStats