Dual Legitimacy and Constitutional Court’s Role in Presidential Impeachment Review

Penulis

  • Ahmad Ahmad Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang image/svg+xml
  • Bagus Wirayuda
  • Brian Rahmat Ismail Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang image/svg+xml
  • Muhamad Fariq Haqi Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang image/svg+xml
  • Mohammad Nurkholis

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31000/ijlp.v6i2.15891

Kata Kunci:

Constitutional Court, Impeachment, Legitimacy, Politics, House of Representatives.

Abstrak

The role of the Indonesian Constitutional Court within Indonesia’s constitutional system is particularly significant in the impeachment mechanism of the president and/or vice president. Following the amendments to the 1945 Constitution, the Court is vested with authority under Article 24C, paragraph (2), to examine and decide upon opinions of the House of Representatives regarding alleged serious legal violations committed by the President. Nevertheless, tension arises between the political legitimacy of the DPR as a representative institution and the legal legitimacy of the Constitutional Court as a judicial body. This tension produces what may be described as dual legitimacy, namely the contestation between political authority and legal authority within the impeachment process. This study critically analyzes the position of the Constitutional Court in such proceedings and juridically examines the limits of its authority as determined by the Constitution. The findings indicate that although the Court plays a decisive role in assessing the legality of accusations, the final decision on removal remains with the People’s Consultative Assembly. This confirms that impeachment in Indonesia is a hybrid process combining legal and political elements, thus requiring clearer regulation and stronger institutional design to prevent overlapping authority among state institutions.

Referensi

Ahmad, A, Fachrurrazy, M, Hartati S.S.Y, Amalia. M, Fauzi, E, Gaol. S.L, Siliwadi, D.N, T. (2024). Buku Ajar Metode Penelitian & Penulisan Hukum (Sepriano (ed.)). PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2021). Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Konstitusi Dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Degdo Suprayitno, A. A. et. a. (2024). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif : Teori Komprehensif Dan Referensi Wajib Bagi Peneliti (1st ed.). Sonpedia Publishing.

Ketetapan Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat Nomor III/MPR/1978 Tentang Keudukan Dan Hubungan Tata Kerja Lembaga Tertinggi Negara Dengan Antar Lembaga Lembaga Tertinggi Negara, (1978).

Hufron. Pemberhentian Presiden Di Indonesia Antara Teori Dan Praktik. Yogyakarta: LaksBang PRESSindo, 2018.

Jazil, Syokron, and Doni Damara Eko Prasetyo. “Pemakzulan Hakim Konstitusi Oleh Dpr (Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat): Terobos Payung Hukum Dan Independensi Mahkamah Konstitusi.†Cermin: Jurnal Penelitian 8, no. 2 (November 6, 2024): 410. https://doi.org/10.36841/cermin_unars.v8i2.5439.

Kumoro, Bawono. “Memahami Pemakzulan Presiden Pasca-Amandemen Konstitusi,†no. 22(2020).

Permadi, I. “Impeachment MK Terhadap Presiden Dan Kekuasaan Mayoritas Di MPR.†Jurnal Konstitusi, no. 4(3) (2007).

Rohmah, Elva Imeldatur and Dewi Kartika Sari. “Mekanisme Pemakzulan Presiden Sebelum Dan Sesudah Terbentuknya Mahkamah Konstitusi Di Indonesia.†As-Shahifah : Journal of Constitutional Law and Governance 2, no. 2 (December 29, 2022): 164–201. https://doi.org/10.19105/asshahifah.v2i2.6955.

Santoso, B. “Dimensi Politik Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Impeachment.â€

Jurnal Hukum Dan Ketatanegaraan, no. 12(1) (2023): 45-62.

Sekretariat Negara RI. “Ketetapan Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat Nomor III/MPR/1978 Tentang Keudukan Dan Hubungan Tata Kerja Lembaga Tertinggi Negara Dengan Antar Lembaga Lembaga Tertinggi Negara.†Sekretariat Negara, 1978. Jakarta.

Sulistyowati, & Dewi Nadya Maharani. “Langkah Konstitusional Dalam Impeachment Presiden Di Indonesia.†Morality: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, no. Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024).

Warsito & Widodo Budidarmo. “Dinamika Politik Pasca Amandemen UUD NRI 1945: Evaluasi Pemakzulan Presiden Berdasarkan Putusan Yuridis Dan Keputusan Politik.†UNES Law Review, no. Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024).

Whittington, K. E. (2019). A Formidable Weapon of Faction? The Law and Politics of Impeachment. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3328981

Wibowo, A. “Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pemakzulan Presiden: Kajian Legal-Political Judgment.†Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara, no. 15(2) (2022): 101-115.

Diterbitkan

2026-02-12