Legal Empirical Public Health Analysis of Smoke Free Regulation Revision in Kulon Progo

Penulis

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31000/ijlp.v6i2.16121

Kata Kunci:

KTR Regional Regulation, policy revision, public health, juridical-empirical, local government

Abstrak

This article aims to analyze the discourse surrounding the revision of the Local Regulation on Smoke-Free Zones (KTR) in Kulon Progo Regency from a legal-empirical perspective, focusing on aspects of public health protection and the consistency of local policies. This study employs a legal-empirical method using a regulatory approach and a sociological approach. Data were collected through document analysis and policy analysis, supported by the evolving social dynamics within the community. The results indicate that the revision of the KTR Regional Regulation has the potential to weaken public health protection and reduce the consistency of the local government in implementing health-based policies. On the other hand, there are socio-economic pressures driving regulatory flexibility. Therefore, a policy approach oriented toward the long-term interests of the community is needed, while maintaining a balance between individual rights and collective rights to a healthy environment.

Referensi

Ahmad, A, Fachrurrazy, M, Hartati S.S.Y, Amalia. M, Fauzi, E, Gaol. S.L, Siliwadi, D.N, T. (2024). Buku Ajar Metode Penelitian & Penulisan Hukum (Sepriano (ed.)). PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.

American Cancer Society, & Vital Strategies. (2018). The tobacco atlas (6th ed.). Atlanta: American Cancer Society.

Bayer, R., & Stuber, J. (2006). Tobacco control, stigma, and public health: Rethinking the relations. American Journal of Public Health, 96(1), 47–50.

Callinan, J. E., Clarke, A., Doherty, K., & Kelleher, C. (2010). Legislative smoking bans for reducing secondhand smoke exposure. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (4).

Chaloupka, F. J., Sweanor, D., & Warner, K. E. (2017). Differential taxes for differential risks—Toward reduced harm from nicotine-yielding products. New England Journal of Medicine, 373(7), 594–597.

Degdo Suprayitno, A. A. et. a. (2024). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif : Teori Komprehensif Dan Referensi Wajib Bagi Peneliti (1st ed.). Sonpedia Publishing.

Fong, G. T., Hammond, D., & Hitchman, S. C. (2010). The impact of pictures on the effectiveness of tobacco warnings. Tobacco Control, 18(5), 358–364.

Frazer, K., Callinan, J. E., McHugh, J., van Baarsel, S., Clarke, A., Doherty, K., & Kelleher, C. (2015). Legislative smoking bans for reducing harms from secondhand smoke exposure. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (2).

Gilmore, A. B., Fooks, G., Drope, J., Bialous, S. A., & Jackson, R. (2007). Exposing and countering tobacco industry efforts to influence government policy. Lancet, 369(9570), 1417–1427.

Goodchild, M., Zheng, Y., & van der Meer, R. (2018). Global economic cost of smoking-attributable diseases. Tobacco Control, 27(1), 58–63.

Hastuti, S., Thabrany, H., & Susilowati, I. (2018). Implementation of smoke-free policies in Indonesian cities. Journal of Public Health Research, 7(2), 45–52.

Jones, M. R., Barnoya, J., & Stranges, S. (2017). Smoke-free laws and secondhand smoke exposure. American Journal of Public Health, 104(6), e45–e55.

Li, Q., Hyland, A., O’Connor, R., & Fong, G. T. (2019). The association between exposure to point-of-sale tobacco marketing and smoking cessation. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 21(2), 150–158.

Mamudu, H. M., Hammond, R., & Glantz, S. A. (2016). Tobacco industry efforts to obstruct smoke-free policies in low- and middle-income countries. Tobacco Control, 25(6), 629–636.

Mazmanian, D. A., & Sabatier, P. A. (1983). Implementation and Public Policy. Scott, Foresman.

Mindell, J., Ison, E., & Joffe, M. (2001). A glossary for health impact assessment. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 57(9), 647–651.

Mindell, J. S., Boltong, M., & Forde, I. (2001). Health impact assessment: informing decisions, improving health. Journal of Public Health Medicine, 23(1), 38–45.

Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia. (2021). Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) Indonesia 2021. Jakarta: Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia.

Ng, M., Freeman, M. K., Fleming, T. D., Robinson, M., Dwyer-Lindgren, L., Thomson, B., ... & Gakidou, E. (2014). Smoking prevalence and cigarette consumption in 187 countries. JAMA, 311(2), 183–192.

Prabawati, R., Ahsan, A., & Wibowo, Y. (2020). Implementation of tobacco control policies in Indonesia. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 21(4), 1021–1027.

Reich, M. R. (1996). The politics of reforming health policies. Health Policy, 35(2), 135–152.

Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (Eds.). (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Westview Press.

Smith, K. E. (2016). Understanding the influence of the tobacco industry on health policy: A political economy perspective. Critical Public Health, 26(5), 545–558.

Smith, K. E., & Lee, K. (2019). The tobacco industry and tobacco control policy. Global Public Health, 14(2), 1–15.

Solar, O., & Irwin, A. (2010). A conceptual framework for action on the social determinants of health. World Health Organization.

Tan, Y. L., Dorotheo, E. U., & Ulysses, D. (2016). Smoke-free policies in Southeast Asia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health, 28(2), 45S–52S.

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

UNDP. (1997). Governance for sustainable human development. New York: United Nations Development Programme.

World Health Organization. (2021). WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic 2021. Geneva: WHO.

World Health Organization. (2023). Tobacco. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/tobacco

Unduhan

Terbitan

Vol 6 No 2 (2025): Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies

Bagian

Articles

Lisensi

The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, the copyright of the article shall be assigned to Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies, Post Graduate in Law Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang, Indonesia as the publisher of the journal.

Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies (IJLPS) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies (IJLPS). Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies (IJLPS). Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).