Execution of Fiduciary Collateral Based on the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019

Sofyan Wimbo Agung Pradnyawan, Siti Syahida Nurani, Arief Budiono, Sasongko Sasongko

Abstract


The Constitutional Court responded to the existence of a debt collector who had been very unsettling by the Constitutional Court by issuing Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 dated January 6, 2020. Based on the request for a judicial review of Law 42/1999 submitted by husband and wife Apriliani Dewi and Suri Agung Prabowo . Apriliani is a fiduciary who experiences direct losses as a result of creditors' withdrawal of the object of fiduciary security in the form of a car. Both applicants are declared to have legal standing in submitting a request for a judicial review. The Constitutional Court granted it with Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019. In this decision, the execution mechanism for the fiduciary guarantee object was changed by the Constitutional Court as long as it was not provided voluntarily by the debtor. Previously, the Fiduciary Law allowed creditors to execute the object of fiduciary collateral themselves, but now to carry out the execution, creditors must submit an application to the District Court. However, the implementation of direct execution by the creditor without going through the District Court can be done if the debtor admits that there is a default or default in his agreement with the creditor.


Keywords


Execution, Fiduciary, Constitutional Court

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ade, A. dan Edia, H. (2009). Bank dan Lembaga Keuangan Bukan Bank. Jakarta Barat: PT. Macanan Jaya Cemerlang.

Agus, Y. H. (2014). Hukum Perjanjian: Asas Proporsionalitas Dalam Kontrak Komersial. Cet. IV Jakarta: Prenada Media.

Aprilianti. (2011). Perjanjian Sewa Guna Usaha antara Lesse dan Lessor. Fiat Justisia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. ISSN: 1978-5186. 5(3), September-Desember 2011

Arya, W. D. (2020). Lembaga Jaminan Fidusia: Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019. Nagari Law Review. 3(2).

Ita, A. (2018). Perusahaan leasing dan Debt Collector dalam Penagihan Kredit Macet Kendaraan Debitur. Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan. ISSN: 2338-4638. 2(8).

James, R. E. (2020). Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019. 12(1).

Jatmiko, W. (2015). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur pada Perjanjian Jaminan Fidusia. Jurnal Independent. Fakuktas Hukum Universitas Islam Lamongan. 7(3).

Joni, A. (2020). Rekonstruksi Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019. Eksekusi. 2(1).

Khifni, K. R. and Rian S. (2019). Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Tanpa Titel Eksekutorial Yang Sah. Refleksi Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. 4.

Khotibul, U. (2010). Hukum Lembaga Pembiayaan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Yustisia.

M. Yahya, Harahap. (2005). Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

M. Yasir. (2016). Aspek Hukum Jaminan Fidusia. Salam Jurnal Sosial & Budaya Syari. Jakarta: UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. 3(1).

Moch. Isnaeni. (2017). Pengantar Hukum Jaminan Kebendaan. Yogyakarta: LaksBang PRESSindo.

Munir, F. (2013). Hukum Jaminan Utang. Jakarta: PT Erlangga.

Nahrowi. (2013). Permasalahan Hukum Pembiayaan Leasing di Indonesia. Jurnal Cita Hukum. 1(1).

Nining, W. (2013). Sewa Guna Usaha (Leasing) dalam Perspektif Syariah. Jurnal Al-Amwal. ISSN: 2303-1573. 5(1).

Shavira, R. (2017). Penarikan Kendaraan Bermotor Oleh Perusahaan Pembiayaan Terhadap Debitur Yang Mengalami Kredit Macet (Wanprestasi) Dengan Jaminan Fidusia Ditinjau Dari Aspek Yuridis. Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Hukum. 6(2).

Sri, S. (2014). Hukum Jaminan di Indonesia Pokok-Pokok Hukum Jaminan dan Jaminan Perorangan. Yogyakarta: Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Departemen Kehakiman, Liberty.

Sugianto. (2014). Rekontruksi Perjanjian Fidusia atas Benda Bergerak yang didaftarkan Berdasarkan Nilai Keadilan. Jurnal Pembaharua Hukum 1(3).

Sunaryo. (2007). Hukum Lembaga Pembiayaan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Vera, R. S. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Debt Collector Dan Leasing Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019. Gorontalo Law Review. 1(2).

Zaeni, A. (2018). Hukum Keperdataan dalam Perspektif Hukum Nasional, Perdata (BW), Hukum Islam, dan Hukum Adat. Depok: PT. Raja Grafindo.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/ijlp.v1i2.3165

Article Metrics

Abstract - 559 PDF - 494

DOI (PDF): http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/ijlp.v1i2.3165.g1987

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.