Online Alternative Dispute Resolution for Consumer Dispute Settlement in the Digital World
Abstract
Online dispute resolution by consumer dispute resolution agency has not been regulated in consumer protection law. The aims of this study: (i) showing online alternative dispute resolution is concept of consumer dispute resolution by consumer dispute resolution agency in digital world in Indonesia; (ii) showing the urgency of regulation and matters regulated in consumer protection law relating to online alternative dispute resolution. The author uses normative juridical research. The results show first, online alternative dispute resolution for consumer dispute resolution by consumer dispute resolution agency can overcome the problem of long time and not cheap costs incurred by consumers to resolve disputes, in line with the increase in digital consumers, whose implementation can improve assessment of alternative dispute resolution related to effectiveness rule of law. Second, online alternative dispute resolution needs to be regulated in consumer protection law so that consumer dispute resolution agency get legal certainty to apply them in consumer dispute resolution. Regarding the regulation, it can refer to International Council for Online Dispute Resolution and strengthen the institution of consumer dispute resolution agency. The regulation and implementation of online alternative dispute resolution by the consumer dispute resolution agency has been strengthened by success in several other countries.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agus Riswadi, B. 2003. Hukum dan Internet Indonesia. UII Press. Yogyakarta.
Andreia G. Pereira, Tania M. Lima, dan Fernando Charrua Santos, Industry 4.0 and Society 5.0: Opportunities and Threats, International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE) ISSN: 2277-3878, 8 (5).
Asshiddiqie, J, dan Ali Safa’at, M. 2006. Teori Hans Kelsen tentang Hukum. Setjen dan Kepaniteraan MK RI. Jakarta.
Catriana, E. 2021. Kemendag Catat 7.368 Pengaduan Konsumen di Sektor E-Commerce. Money.Kompas.com. Jakarta. Accessed in https://money.kompas.com/read/2021/10/25/175057626/kemendag-catat-7368-pengaduan-konsumen-di-sektor-e-commerce
Del Duca L, Rule C, and Loebl Z. 2012. Facilitating Expansion of Cross-Border E-Commerce – Developing a Global Online Dispute Resolution System (Lesson Derived from Existing ODR System – Work of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs 1 (1), Accessed in https://elibrary.law.psu.edu/jlia/vol1/iss1/4
Esther van den Heuvel. Online Dispute Resolution as A Solution to Cross-Border E-Disputes: An Introduction to ODR. p. 8, Accessed in http://www.oecd.org/internet/consumer/1878940.pdf
European Commission. Online Dispute Resolution. Accessed in https://ec.europa.eu/consumers/odr/main/?event=main.trader.register
Fish, S., 2017. Thomas Hobbes: The Father of Law and Literature. Law & Literature Journal. 29(1). pp.151-156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1535685X.2016.1246911
Google Temasek dan Bain Company. 2021. SEA e-Conomy Research 2021. Accessed in https://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/indonesia_e_conomy_sea_2021_report.pdf
Halim Barkatullah, A. 2016. Framework Sistem Perlindungan Hukum bagi Konsumen di Indonesia. Nusa Media, Bandung.
International Council for Online Dispute Resolution (ICODR). Accessed in https://icodr.org/
Katsh E, Rifkin J, Gaintenby A. 1999. E-Commerce, E-Dispute, and E-Dispute Resolution: in the Shadow of e Bay Law. Ohio State J Disput Resolut 15;705.
Katsh E, Rifkin J. 2001. Online Dispute Resolution Resolving Conflicts in Cyberspace. Jossey-Bass Wiley Company, San Francisco.
Khan, A.G. 2016. Electronic commerce: A study on benefits and challenges in an emerging economy. Global Journal of Management and Business Research.
Mahmud Marzuki, P. 2011. Penelitian Hukum. Kencana. Jakarta.
Muhaimin. 2020. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram University Press. Mataram.
Petrauskas, F, dan Kbartiene, E. 2011. Online Dispute Resolution in Consumer Disputes. Jurisprudencia. Mykolas Romeris Universitty.
Rahayu, T. 2014. Polemik BPSK Solo: Meski Tutup, Aduan Konsumen Masih Mengalir ke BPSK. Solopos.com, Accessed in https://www.solopos.com/polemik-bpsk-solo-meski-tutup-aduan-konsumen-masih-mengalir-ke-bpsk-536990
Rizhan, A. 2020. Konsep Hukum Dan Ide Keadilan Berdasarkan Teori Hukum Statis (Nomostatics) Hans Kelsen. Jurnal Kodifikasi, 2(1): 61-71.
Setiantoro, A., Putri, F.D., Novitarani, A. and Njatrijani, R. 2018. Urgensi Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen Dan Penyelesaian Sengketa E-Commerce Di Era Masyarakat Ekonomi Asean. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 7(1): 1-17.
S. Bol. An Analysis of the Role of Difference Playersin E-mediation: The Legal Implications, in J. Zeleznikow and A.R. Lodder (eds.). Proceedings of the Second International ODR Workshop. Tilburg, Wolf Legal Publishers, 2005. pp. 23-30.
Indonesia. 1999. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 1999 Nomor 42. Tambahan Negara RI Nomor 3821. Sekretariat Negara. Jakarta.
Indonesia. 2011. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan, Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 2011 Nomor 82, Tambahan Negara RI Nomor 5234. Sekretariat Negara. Jakarta.
United Nations, 2020. Peace, Justice, and Strong Institution: Why They Matter, United Nations, Accessed in https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/16_Why-It-Matters-2020.pdf
United Nations. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, United Nations, Accessed in https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org
U. Dombrowski, T. Richter, P. Krenkel. 2017. Interdependencies of Industrie 4.0 & Lean Production Systems – a use case analysis, 27th International Conference on Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing, FAIM2017. Italy.
Wing, L. 2016. Ethical Principles for Online Dispute Resolution A GPS Device for the Field, International Journal on Online Dispute Resolution 2016 3 (1). Accessed in https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2973278
World Justice Project. 2021. WJP Rule of Law 2021. Accessed in https://worldjusticeproject.org/rule-of-law-index/country/2021/Indonesia/
World Justice Project. 2021. WJP Rule of Law 2021. Accessed in https://worldjusticeproject.org/rule-of-law-index/country/2021/Indonesia/Civil%20Justice/
World Justice Project. 2021. WJP Rule of Law 2021. Accessed in https://worldjusticeproject.org/rule-of-law-index/global/2021
Wuri Dewi, E. 2015. Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Cetakan I. Graha Ilmu. Yogyakarta
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/ijlp.v3i1.6254
Article Metrics
Abstract - 569 PDF - 503DOI (PDF): http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/ijlp.v3i1.6254.g3308
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.