AUDITORS’ PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT IN EVALUATING AUDIT EVIDENCE SUFFICIENCY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31000/competitive.v10i1.15203Kata Kunci:
Professional Judgment, Audit Evidence Sufficiency, Revenue Audit, MaterialityAbstrak
Ensuring sufficient audit evidence is a core aspect of auditors’ professional responsibility in preventing material misstatements. This study aims to obtain empirical evidence on how auditors apply professional judgment in assessing audit evidence sufficiency for revenue accounts. Using a qualitative case study at Public Accounting Firm SS, data were collected through semi-structured interviews with two auditors and validated by document triangulation. Results show that approximately 80% of audit effort is directed toward revenue verification, reflecting its high-risk nature. Auditors apply professional judgment by considering materiality (quantitative threshold of 10% profit or 1% of total assets), audit risk, and transaction complexity. Supervision and team collaboration strengthen judgment reliability and accountability. The study concludes that structured professional judgment enhances evidence sufficiency and audit quality, emphasizing the need for continuous supervision and reflective team discussions.
Referensi
L. A. Wijayanti, “Manajemen Laba: Mengelola Keuntungan Atau Manipulasi Laporan Keuangan?,†Jurnal Studi Multidisipliner, vol. 9, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Jan. 2025, Accessed: May 08, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://oaj.jurnalhst.com/index.php/jsm/article/view/8807
E. T. A. Claudio and A. Riduwan, “Pengaruh Profesionalisme Auditor Terhadap Tingkat Materialitas Dalam Pemeriksaan Laporan Keuangan,†Jurnal Ilmu dan Riset Akuntansi (JIRA), vol. 12, no. 12, Dec. 2023, Accessed: May 08, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://jurnalmahasiswa.stiesia.ac.id/index.php/jira/article/view/5667
M. G. P. R. Pangesti and D. A. Prihastiwi, “Pengaruh Pengetahuan Auditor, Pengalaman Auditor, dan Kompleksitas Tugas Terhadap Audit Judgment (Studi Empiris Pada Auditor KAP di Wilayah Kota Semarang dan Yogykarta),†Risma, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 831–843, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.29303/risma.v2i4.356.
N. M. Waluyo and R. M. S. A. Atmaja, “Penerapan Sikap Profesionalisme Auditor pada Pemeriksaan Aset dan Kas KAP Rudiana Fibriani,†JREA-ITB, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 494–504, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.54066/jrea-itb.v2i4.2702.
A. Ardianingsih, Audit Laporan Keuangan. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara, 2021.
A. A. Arens, R. J. Elder, M. S. Beasley, and C. E. Hogan, Auditing and Assurance Services: An Integreated Approach 17th Edition, 17th ed. Pearson International Edition, 2020.
R. P. Sari, S. Hastuti, and D. Ratnawati, Pemerikaan Akuntansi Berbasis International Standards on Auditing (ISA). Surabaya: Scopino Media Pustaka, 2020.
M. Muhsin, “Pengetahuan, Profesionalisma, Urutan Bukti Audit dan Audit Judgment,†FORBISWIRA Forum Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 168–180, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.35957/forbiswira.v10i2.808.
M. Rosdiana, “Perolehan Bukti Audit Berdasarkan Standar Audit 570 dan 580 Untuk Mendukung Opini Audit,†Majalah Ekonomi, vol. 28, no. 02, pp. 56–62, 2023, doi: 10.36456/majeko.vol28.no02.a8405.
V. Nuari, “Analisis Pengalaman Auditor Pada Penggunaan Bukti Tidak Relevan Dalam Audit Judgment Di Kantor Akuntan Publik Di Wilayah Jakarta Timur,†skripsi, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Indonesia Jakarta, 2023. Accessed: May 08, 2025. [Online]. Available: http://repository.stei.ac.id/10093/
I. Munawarah, “Pengaruh Kompetensi & Independensi Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit Dengan Kompetensi Bukti Audit Sebagai Variabel Intervening,†Jurnal GICI Jurnal Keuangan dan Bisnis, vol. 14, no. 1, Art. no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.58890/jkb.v14i1.1.
J. Taufan and K. M. Ramadhani, “Pengaruh Keahlian Auditor, Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor dan Tekanan Anggaran Waktu Terhadap Audit Judgment,†Jurnal Revenue : Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, vol. 5, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.46306/rev.v5i2.897.
F. Noho, Sabaruddin, and Sulhendri, “Auditor Seniority, Auditor Experience and Auditor Expertise towards Professional Judgment With Locus of Control as Moderating Variable:,†Journal of Accounting Science, vol. 5, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.21070/jas.v5i1.1185.
Y. Irwanda and C. Kuntadi, “Pengaruh Pengalaman, Pengetahuan Dan Skeptisisme Profesional Terhadap Audit Judgement,†JURNAL ILMIAH EKONOMI DAN MANAJEMEN, vol. 2, no. 6, Art. no. 6, May 2024, doi: 10.61722/jiem.v2i6.1298.
M. Kusumawaty and K. Krisnahari, “Tekanan Ketaatan dan Pengalaman Auditor Terhadap Audit Judgment,†JAB, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 146, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.32502/jab.v7i2.5383.
R. Chrisna Putri and E. Sulistyowati, “Analisis Materialitas Pada Prosedur Audit Vouching Atas Akun Beban Operasional,†balance, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 154–167, Sept. 2023, doi: 10.25170/balance.v20i2.4468.
O. O. Sibarani, V. Julianti, and S. L. Samosir, “Peran Materialitas dalam Praktik Audit: Menjamin Keakuratan Laporan Keuangan,†Jurnal Motivasi Pendidikan dan Bahasa, vol. 2, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Oct. 2024, Accessed: May 08, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://ourhope.biz.id/ojs/index.php/JP/article/view/10
N. F. Ramadhani and N. N. A. Triani, “Penerapan Teknologi Berbasis Iot (Internet Of Things) dalam Pengumpulan Bukti Audit di Masa Pandemi Covid-19,†Accounting Global Journal, vol. 6, no. 2.
H. Prastomo, “Pengaruh Kompetensi Auditor dan Risiko Audit Terhadap Persuasivitas Bukti Audit (Studi pada Kantor Akuntan Publik Drs Thomas Blasius Widartoyo & Rekan yang Terdaftar di Ikatan Akuntan Publik Indonesia),†skripsi, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Indonesia (STEI) Jakarta, 2021. Accessed: May 08, 2025. [Online]. Available: http://repository.stei.ac.id/5224/
N. Hasanah and T. Siswanti, “Evaluasi Pengakuan, Pengukuran Dan Penyajian Pendapatan Berdasar PSAK 23 Pada PT. Angkasa Pura II (Persero),†Jurnal Bisnis & Akuntansi UNSURYA, vol. 4, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.35968/jbau.v4i1.262.
Y. N. Maryam, “Analisis Pemeriksaan Kepatuhan Atas Akun Pendapatan Blu X Terhadap Aturan Tarif Yang Berlaku,†Jurnal Rumpun Manajemen dan Ekonomi, vol. 1, no. 4, Art. no. 4, Sept. 2024, doi: 10.61722/jrme.v1i4.2593.
F. Salsabila and H. Nugroho, “Prosedur Test of Details untuk Menguji Asersi Keterjadian, Kelengkapan, dan Keakuratan pada Akun Pendapatan Operasional,†Seminar Nasional Akuntansi dan Manajemen PNJ, vol. 4, no. 2, Art. no. 2, 2023, Accessed: June 26, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://prosiding.pnj.ac.id/SNAM/article/view/1516
B. Nugroho, “Potensi Manipulasi Pendapatan Menggunakan Model Beneish M-Score, Studi Kasus pada Laporan Keuangan PT Garuda Indonesia Tbk., Tahun 2017-2018,†Jurnal Online Insan Akuntan, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 73, June 2020, doi: 10.51211/joia.v5i1.1321.
Payamto, Auditing Modern Pendekatan Risiko dan Teknologi Terkini Seri 1. Ruang Karya Bersama, 2024.
Hery, Auditing (Pemeriksaan Akuntansi I). Yogyakarta: Center of Academic Publishing Service (CAPS), 2023.
W. R. Ningsih and M. Purwanti, “Proses Audit Oleh KAP Hartman Atas Siklus Pendapatan dan Piutang di PT. MUJU Tahun 2020,†PROSIDING FRIMA, no. 4, pp. 252–266, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.55916/frima.v0i4.380.
R. Safarudin, Z. Zulfamanna, M. Kustati, and N. Sepriyanti, “Penelitian Kualitatif,†Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, vol. 3, no. 2, Art. no. 2, June 2023.
N. N. Septiana, Z. Khoiriyah, and Shaleh, “Metode Penelitian Studi Kasus Dalam Pendekatan Kualitatif,†Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, vol. 10, no. 04, Art. no. 04, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.36989/didaktik.v10i04.5181.
Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: ALFABETA, 2023.
D. A. Sumilih et al., Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: PT. Star Digital Publishing, 2025.
S. Donkoh, “Application of triangulation in qualitative research,†JABB, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 6–9, 2023, doi: 10.15406/jabb.2023.10.00319.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Â
The authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
Â
The authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Lisensi Atribusi Creative Commons (CC BY) that allows others to share the work with acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and its initial publication in this journal.
Â
Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (for example, posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Â
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (for example, in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) prior to and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (see The Pengaruh Akses Terbuka ).
Â
The Competitive Journal of Accounting and Finance applies the CC-BY-SA license or its equivalent as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly works.
Â
In developing strategies and setting priorities, the Competitive Journal of Accounting and Finance of Muhammadiyah University of Tangerang recognizes that free access is better than paid access, gratis access is better than restricted access, and libre under CC-BY-SA or its equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We must achieve what we can when we can. We must not delay achieving freedom in order to reach libre, and we must not stop at freedom when we can achieve libre.
