Comparison Of K-Means Method And Fuzzy Clustering Algorithm In Determining Customer Satisfaction Test In Delivery Services
Abstract
Tanggapan kepuasan pelanggan, tanggapan atau tanggapan yang diberikan oleh konsumen setelah kebutuhannya akan suatu produk atau jasa telah terpenuhi. , maka kualitas layanan menjadi sangat penting untuk persaingan. Perbandingan performansi algoritma clustering dengan pemodelan K-Means Clustering dan pemodelan Fuzzy C-Means didasarkan pada kecepatan proses dan penelusuran parameter perbandingan K-Means dan Fuzzy K-Means mampu menunjukkan hasil yang diusulkan. cara efektif dari hasil pengelompokan. Oleh karena itu, uji komparasi antara kedua metode data mining pada K-mean clustering dan pemodelan Fuzzy K-means adalah untuk menentukan metode algoritma terbaik dalam menganalisis tingkat kepuasan pelanggan dalam jasa pengirimanReferences
B, B., N, S., P, R. B., & Gugulothu, S. K. (2020). A novel assessment study on a dynamic analysis of hydrodynamic journal bearing performance: A Taguchi-fuzzy based approach optimization. Transportation Engineering, 2(July), 100033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.treng.2020.100033
Diez-Olivan, A., Pagan, J. A., Sanz, R., & Sierra, B. (2017). Data-driven prognostics using a combination of constrained K-means clustering, fuzzy modeling and LOF-based score. Neurocomputing, 241, 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2017.02.024
Dou, R., Li, W., Nan, G., Wang, X., & Zhou, Y. (2021). How can manufacturers make decisions on product appearance design? A research on optimal design based on customers’ emotional satisfaction. Journal of Management Science and Engineering, xxxx. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmse.2021.02.010
Eldin, S. S., Mohammed, A., Hefny, H., & Ahmed, A. S. E. (2021). An Enhanced Opinion Retrieval Approach on Arabic Text for Customer Requirements Expansion. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 33(3), 351–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2019.01.010
Klir, G. J., & Yuan, B. O. (1995). Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic (P. Guerrieri (ed.)).
Kuhl, J., & Krause, D. (2019). Strategies for customer satisfaction and customer requirement fulfillment within the trend of individualization. Procedia CIRP, 84, 130–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.278
Likas, A., Vlassis, N., & Verbeek, J. J. (2003). The global k -means clustering algorithm. 36, 451–461.
Lin, E. M. H., & Tseng, M. M. (2018). Tolerances of Customers’ Requirements: A Review of Current Researches. Procedia CIRP, 72, 1208–1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.203
Liu, C., Chang, T., & Li, H. (2013). Clustering documents with labeled and unlabeled documents using fuzzy semi-Kmeans. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 221, 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2013.01.004
Liu, Y., Ma, Z., Yan, Z., Wang, Z., Liu, X., & Ma, J. (2020). Privacy-preserving federated k-means for proactive caching in next generation cellular networks. Information Sciences, 521, 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2020.02.042
Naumov, V. (2018). Modeling Demand for Freight Forwarding Services on the Grounds of Logistics Portals Data. Transportation Research Procedia, 30, 324–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2018.09.035
Nguyen, T. T. N. (2020). Developing and validating five-construct model of customer satisfaction in beauty and cosmetic E-commerce. Heliyon, 6(9), e04887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04887
Passino, K. M., & Yurkovich, S. (1998). Fuzzy Control. Addison Wesley Longman.
Schneberger, J. H., Luedeke, T., & Vielhaber, M. (2018). Agile Transformation and Correlation of Customer-Specific Requirements and System-Inherent Characteristics - An Automotive Example. Procedia CIRP, 70(i), 78–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.068
Uzir, M. U. H., Jerin, I., Al Halbusi, H., Hamid, A. B. A., & Latiff, A. S. A. (2020). Does quality stimulate customer satisfaction where perceived value mediates and the usage of social media moderates? Heliyon, 6(12), e05710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05710
Yu, A. S., Chu, S., & Wang, C. (2018). Two Improved k-means Algorithms. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 68, 747–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.08.032
Copyright (c) 2021 JIKA (Jurnal Informatika)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with International Journal of Advances in Intelligent Informatics agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Â
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
International Journal of Advances in Intelligent Informatics use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)
Creative Commons CC-Zero Waiver, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and Licence, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1-0/
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.
Open Data and Software Publishing and Sharing
The journal strives to maximize the replicability of the research published in it. Authors are thus required to share all data, code or protocols underlying the research reported in their articles. Exceptions are permitted but have to be justified in a written public statement accompanying the article.
Datasets and software should be deposited and permanently archived inappropriate, trusted, general, or domain-specific repositories (please consult http://service.re3data.org and/or software repositories such as GitHub, GitLab, Bioinformatics.org, or equivalent). The associated persistent identifiers (e.g. DOI, or others) of the dataset(s) must be included in the data or software resources section of the article. Reference(s) to datasets and software should also be included in the reference list of the article with DOIs (where available). Where no domain-specific data repository exists, authors should deposit their datasets in a general repository such as ZENODO, Dryad, Dataverse, or others.
Small data may also be published as data files or packages supplementary to a research article, however, the authors should prefer in all cases a deposition in data repositories.