ANALISA KOORDINASI, KOMUNIKASI DAN BUDAYA ORGANISASI TERHADAP KINERJA PEGAWAI SEKRETARIAT DPRD KOTA TANGERANG

Irma Darmawati, Priyo Susilo

Abstract


The purpose of this study was conducted to determine the effect of communication, communication and social performance on the Tangerang City DPRD Secretariat. The research method used is survey research method. P The population of this study is all employees of the Tangerang City DPRD Secretariat totaling 60 people. The sampling technique uses saturated sampling techniques from the total population of 60 people, so the research sample is taken. The number of samples in this study was 60 people. Data analysis using Multiple Linear Regression Analysis. Based on the results of the study indicate that: There is a positive and significant effect of coordination on employee performance at the Tangerang City DPRD Secretariat. This means that the better coordination will improve employee performance, and vice versa, the worse the coordination will have an impact on employee performance. There is a positive and significant influence of communication on employee performance at the Tangerang City DPRD Secretariat. This means that the better the communication will improve employee performance, and vice versa the worse the communication will have an impact on the low performance of employees.There is a positive and significant influence of organizational culture on employee performance. at the Tangerang City DPRD Secretariat. This means that the better the organizational culture will improve employee performance, and vice versa the worse the employee's organizational culture will have an impact on the low performance of employees.There is an influence of coordination, communication and organizational culture together on employee performance at the Tangerang City DPRD Secretariat. This means that good coordination, communication and organizational culture will affect the improvement of employee performance, and vice versa, poor coordination, communication and organizational culture will have an impact on the low performance of employees


Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2011. Prosedur Penelitian, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Cangara, Hafied. 2012. Pengantar Ilmu komunikasi. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Dawson, EJ. dan Burgoon, Hunsaker. 2014. Komunikasi manusia. Thousand Oaks. CA; Sage.

Effendi, Onong Uchjana. 2010. Ilmu Komunikasi Teori dan Praktek. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Faules, Don dan F. R. Wayne Pace. 2011. Komunikasi Organisasi; Strategi Meningkatkan Kinerja Sekretariat. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Gibson, Ivencevich, & Donnelly. 2012. Organisasi, Edisi Kedelapan, Jilid I, Terjemahan, Jakarta: Binarupa Aksara.

Handoko, T. Hani. 2013. Manajemen Personalia dan Sumber Daya Manusia, Yogyakarta: BPFE.

________ 2011. Manajemen. Cet. XVIII; Yogyakarta: BPFE-Yogyakarta.

Hasibuan, Malayu. S.P. 2011. Organisasi dan Motivasi Dasar Peningkatan Produktivitas, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

________ 2013. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Lestari, Endang. 2013. Komunikasi yang Efektif. Jakarta: Lembaga Administrasi Negara.

Mangkunegara, Anwar P. 2012. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Sekretariat. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Muhammad, Arni. 2015. Komunikasi Organisasi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Ndraha, Taliziduhu. 2011. Ilmu Pemerintahan Baru. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

________ , 2007. Budaya Organisasi dan Peningkatan Kinerja Perusahaan. Jakarta : PT. Bumi Aksara

Purwanto, Ngalim. 2011. Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi, Jakarta: GIP, IKIP.

Robbins, S.P. 2011. Perilaku Organisasi Konsep Kontroversi Aplikasi, Edisi 8, Jilid 1, Terjemahan, Jakarta: Prehalindo.

_________ 2013. Perilaku Organisasi, Jilid I, Edisi 9 (Indonesia), PT. Indeks Kelompok Gramedia, Jakarta.

Sedarmayanti. 2011. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.

Siagian, Sondang P. 2013. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Singarimbun, Masri & Sofyan Effendi. 2010. Metode Penelitian Survei, Edisi Revisi, Jakarta: LP3ES.

Steers, R.M., Porter & G.A. Bigley. 2012. Motivation and Leadership at Work, New York: McGraw-Hill.

Sudjana, Nana. 2014. Metode Statistik, Bandung: Tarsito.

Sugiyono, 2011. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suranto. 2015. Komunikasi PerSekretariatan. Yogyakarta: Media Wacana.

Sutrisno, Edi. 2010. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Terry, GR. 2011. Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia, Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Umar, Husein. 2013. Riset Pemasaran & Perilaku Konsumen, Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Utama.

Halilah Li. 2013. Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Pada Perusahaan Daerah Air Minum (PDAM) Kota Bandung. Jurnal UPI Vol 1 Edisi. Hal 238-248.

Herman dan Nusa, Abdi. 2015. Pengaruh Komunikasi dan Koordinasi Organisasi terhadap Kinerja Komisi Pemilihan Umum (KPUD) Sumatera Selatan. JURNAL Ekonomi dan Bisnis (JENIUS) VOL. 5 NO. 1

Hendriani, Susi, 2014. Pengaruh Motivasi Dan Komunikasi Terhadapkinerja Pegawai Di Lingkungan Sekretariat Daerah Propinsi Riau. Jurnal Aplikasi Bisnis, vol. 4 no. 2, April 2014

Octorano, Donny Feronika, 2015. Pengaruh Koordinasi, Kompetensi Dan Disiplin Terhadapkinerja Pegawai Unit Layanan Pengadaan Kementerian Agama Pusat (ULP Kemenag Pusat). Jurnal MIX, Volume V, No. 1, Feb 2015

Slamet, Achmad. 2014, Model Uji Kompetensi Pegawai Produktifi SDN bidang Bisnis dan Manajemen. Dokumen Jurnal. 1: 170-173 diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Zeithaml, Valarie A., Leonard L. Berry & A. Parasuraman. April 2014. “The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 60, page 31-46.

Peraturan Walikota Tangerang Nomor 56 Tahun 2016

Rencana Kerja Sekretariat DPRD Kota Tangerang tahun 2017




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/jmb.v8i2.1607

Article Metrics

Abstract - 1781 PDF - 1163

DOI (PDF): http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/jmb.v8i2.1607.g1211

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.