JMB : Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis

Articles

Vol 13 No 1 (2024): JMB : Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis

Pengaruh Advertising Dan Kualitas Pelayanan Terhadap Proses Keputusan Pemilihan Universitas (Studi Kasus di Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang)

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31000/jmb.v13i1.10859
Telah diserahkan
Februari 5, 2024
Diterbitkan
Maret 30, 2024

Abstrak

This research aims to determine the influence of advertising and service quality on the decision process of students choosing Muhammadiyah University, Tangerang. The research approach used in this research is quantitative research. Statistical tests were carried out which included simple regression tests, multiple regression tests, simple correlation tests, multiple correlation tests, and determination of determinant coefficients. And hypothesis testing is also carried out, including partial tests (t tests) and simultaneous tests (F tests). Data processing analysis used the SPSS version 23 program. The sampling technique used in this research was Sample Random Sampling, obtaining a sample of 133 respondents. The data collection technique uses a questionnaire given to students in the 2014 to 2017 academic year at Muhammadiyah University, Tangerang. The partial calculation results obtained for advertising tcount are greater than ttable, namely 6.275>1.652. And for service quality tcount is greater than ttable is 7.099>1.652. This means that partially there is a positive and significant contribution between advertising and service quality to the student decision process. Simultaneous testing obtained that Fcount was greater than Ftable, namely 34.721>3.04. This means that simultaneously there is a positive and significant contribution between advertising and service quality to the student decision process

Referensi

  1. Basu, Swastha. (2004). Manajemen Pemasaran
  2. Modern, Irawan Liberty
  3. Dorothea,W. A., (2004). Pengendalian Kualitas
  4. Statistik (Pendekatan Kuantitatif dalam
  5. Manajemen Kualitas). Penerbit CV Andi
  6. Offset: Yogyakarta.
  7. Eliza, Meilaningsih. (2015). Analisis Faktor
  8. Pengambilan keputusan Mendaftar di Institusi
  9. Pendidikan Tinggi Swasta (Studi Pada Program
  10. D3 Manajemen Pemasaran Universitas Telkom
  11. Angkatan 2014). Jurnal.
  12. Ghozali, Imam. (2013). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariat
  13. dengan Program IBM SPSS 21. Edisi ke-7.
  14. Semarang: Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
  15. Johnson, B and Christensen, L. (2012)Educational
  16. Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed
  17. Approaches, (London: SAGE Publications, Inc.
  18. Kotler, Philip. (2002). Manajemen Pemasaran di
  19. Indonesia: Analisis, Perencanaan,
  20. Implementasi dan Pengendalian. Salemba
  21. Empat. Jakarta.
  22. Kotler Philip. dan Keller Kevin Lane. (2012).
  23. Manajemen Pemasaran. Edisi 13 Jilid 1. Jakarta.
  24. Erlangga. Kotler Philip dan Kevin Lane Keller.
  25. Manajemen Pemasaran.Edisi 13 Jilid 2.
  26. Jakarta. Erlangga.
  27. Sukmadinata, N. S. (2009) Metode Penelitian
  28. Pendidikan, (Bandung: PT. Remaja
  29. Rosdakarya.
  30. Nasution. (2010). Manajemen Jasa Terpadu Total
  31. Service Manajemen. Bogor. Ghalia Indonesia
  32. Sugiyono, (2010). Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Cet.
  33. Ke-15. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  34. Sumarwan, Ujang. (2014). Perilaku Konsumen Teori
  35. dan Penerapannya dalam Pemasaran. Bogor.
  36. Ghalia Indonesia
  37. Suryani, Tatik. (2012). Perilaku Konsumen Implikasi
  38. pada Strategi Pemasaran. Yogyakarta. Graha
  39. Ilmu
  40. Tjiptono, Fandy. (2001). Strategi Pemasaran. Edisi
  41. Pertama. Andi Ofset.Yogyakarta.
  42. Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang. (2018).
  43. Pedoman Penulisan Skripsi. Tangerang:
  44. Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis UMT 2018.
  45. Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang. (2018).
  46. Statuta Universitas Muhammadiyah
  47. Vincent, Gaspersz, (2013). Marketing Innovation.
  48. Gramedia Pustaka Indonesia
  49. Wahyuni, Pardamean. (2016). Pengaruh Iklan,
  50. Harga dan Kualitas Layanan Terhadap
  51. Keputusan Pembelian Kartu Simpati di Institute
  52. Perbanas. Jurnal.
  53. Yushli Ana, Sunarto. (2018). Analisis faktor-faktor
  54. yang mempengaruhi keputusan mahasiswa
  55. memilih program studi pendidikan ekonomi FKIP
  56. UNS (studi pada angkatan 2014 dan 2015).
  57. Jurnal.
  58. Yusa, Putra, Academia. (2018). Academica.edu.16
  59. Oktober 2018.
  60. Esha, Dian dan Pratama, Putra. (2022) Pengaruh
  61. Inovasi Produk, Fasilitas, dan Kualitas
  62. Pelayanan Terhadap Loyalitas Pelanggan Roti
  63. Bakar 88 Kutabumi Tangerang. JMB, Vol 11,
  64. No.1, Hal.17-28

##plugins.themes.immersion.displayStats.downloads##

##plugins.themes.immersion.displayStats.noStats##