PRE-SERVICE MATHEMATICS TEACHERS’ ALGEBRAIC THINKING IN SOLVING MATHEMATICS PROBLEMS BASED ON ADVERSITY QUOTIENT

Nur Hanifatur Rahmah; Masduki Masduki

doi:10.31000/prima.v7i2.8714

PRE-SERVICE MATHEMATICS TEACHERS’ ALGEBRAIC THINKING IN SOLVING MATHEMATICS PROBLEMS BASED ON ADVERSITY QUOTIENT

Nur Hanifatur Rahmah, Masduki Masduki

Abstract

Algebraic thinking has an important role in solving mathematics problems. In addition, Adversity Quotient (AQ) is one of the factors that can help students succeed in solving math problems. This study aims to investigate the algebraic thinking skills of pre-service mathematics teachers (PMTs) in solving math problems based on adversity quotient (AQ). This study investigates three components of algebraic thinking, namely generalization, functional thinking, and justification. This research used qualitative approach with a case study method. The subjects were 30 PMTs at one of private universities in Surakarta District, Central Java, Indonesia. Data were collected by the algebraic thinking test, ARP (Adversity Response Profile) questionnaires, and interview protocol. The results showed that climber PMTs were able to demonstrate algebraic thinking activities in the components of arithmetic generalization, functional thinking, and generalization and justification. Camper PMTs were only able to demonstrate algebraic thinking activities in the components of arithmetic generalization and also generalization and justification. Meanwhile, quitter PMTs were unable to demonstrate algebraic thinking activities in all components. It can be concluded that the characteristics of AQ are related to the PMTs’ algebraic thinking abilities

Keywords

algebraic thinking, adversity quotient, pre-service mathematics teachers

Full Text:

PDF

References

Amalliyah, N., Wardono, W., & Mulyono, M. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Aljabar Siswa ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient. Vygotsky:Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Matematika, 4(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.30736/voj.v4i1.420

Amir, M. Z., Nurdin, E., Azmi, M. P., & Andrian, D. (2021). The Increasing of Math Adversity Quotient in Mathematics Cooperative Learning through Metacognitive. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 841–856.

Badawi, A., Richmad, & Agoestanto, A. (2016). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Aljabar dalam Matematika pada Siswa SMP Kelas VIII. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education (UJME), 5(3), 182–189.

Blanton, M. L., & Kaput, J. J. (2011). Functional Thinking as a Route Into Algebra in the Elementary Grades. 5–23.

Brown, R. ., & Herbert, K. (2020). Patterns as Tools for Algebraic Reasoning. Teaching Children Mathematic, 3(6), 340–344.

Hodnik Čadež, T., & Manfreda Kolar, V. (2015). Comparison of types of generalizations and problem-solving schemas used to solve a mathematical problem. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(2), 283–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9598-y

Juwita, R. H., Roemintoyo, R., & Usodo, B. (2020). The Role of Adversity Quotient in the Field of Education: A Review of the Literature on Educational Development. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 6(3), 507–515. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.6.3.507

Kieran, C. (2004). Algebraic Thinking in the Early Grades : What Is It? Mathematics Educator, 8(1), 139–151.

Kriegler, S. (2007). Just What is Algebraic Thinking? Mathematics Educator, 8(1), 1–11.

Lew, H.-C. (2004). Developing Algebraic Thinking in Early Grades: Case Study of Korean Elementary School Mathematics. The Mathematics Educator, 8(1), 88–106.

Lingga, A., & Sari, W. (2013). Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching. Eduma: Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 2(2), 1–5.

Listiawati, N., & Sebayang, S. K. (2019). the Association Between Sociodemographic Factors and Teachers’ Guidance Towards Students’ Adversity Quotient. International Journal of Education, 11(2), 109. https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v11i2.15341

Marpaung, Y. (2007). Karakteristik PMRI (Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Indonesia). Journal on Mathematics Education, 1(1), 1–10.

Masfingatin, T., & Murtafi’ah, W. (2016). Kemampuan Berpikir Logis Mahasiswa dengan Adversity Quotient Tipe Climber dalam Pemecahan Masalah Geometri. Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara, 2(1), 19–29.

Nahrowi, N., Susanto, & Hobri. (2020). The profile of student’s creative thinking skills in mathematics problem solving in terms of adversity quotient. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1465(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1465/1/012064

OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Released Mathematics Items. In OECD Publishing.

Paridjo. (2018). Kemampuan berpikir aljabar mahasiswa dalam materi trigonometri ditinjau dari latar belakang sekolah melalui pembelajaran berbasis masalah. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 1(1), 814–829.

Pebriana, Kamid, & Hariyadi, B. (2019). Proses Berpikir Ilmiah Siswa Tipe Climber Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Biologi Di SMA. Edu-Sains Volume, 8(2), 33–41.

Rahayu, N., & Alyani, F. (2020). Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Ditinjau Dari Adversity Quotient. Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 121. https://doi.org/10.31000/prima.v4i2.2668

Sanit, I. N., Subanji, & Sulandra, I. M. (2019). Profil Penalaran Aljabaris Siswa Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(9), 1213–1221. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v10n3.p490-496

Stoltz, P. G. (1997). Adversity Quotient: Turning Obstacles into Opportunities. In The Business Source. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-4972(00)00010-9

Sukmaningrum, R., & Kurniasari, I. (2022). Profile of student’s algebraic thinking in solving mathematics problems reviewing from adversity quotient. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 17(2), 252–259. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v17i2.3349

Suryadi, B., & Santoso, T. I. (2017). Self-Efficacy, Adversity Quotient, and Students’ Achievement in Mathematics. International Education Studies, 10(10), 12–19.

van Amerom, B. (2002). Reinvention of early algebra. In Developmental research on the transition from arithmetic to algebra.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/prima.v7i2.8714