Land Administration Policy In Bantul and Sleman Districts

Subekti Widiyasno; Dyah Mutiarin; Herdin Arie Saputra; Ikhwan Rahmatika Latif

doi:10.31000/jgcs.v4i2.2573

Land Administration Policy In Bantul and Sleman Districts

Subekti Widiyasno, Dyah Mutiarin, Herdin Arie Saputra, Ikhwan Rahmatika Latif

Abstract

The collection of land belonging to the Yogyakarta Palace or Sultan Ground (SG) and the Paku Alaman Duchy or Paku Alam Ground (PAG) land has been slow due to overlapping regulations. The collection of Sultan Ground and Paku Alam Ground land which is regulated in the Privileges Act is hampered by changes in the status of land ownership at the village level which belongs to the state and individuals. The certification process by the National Land Agency cannot be carried out yet. This data collection is based on Special Region Regulation No. 1 of 2017 concerning Management and Utilization of Sultanate Land and Duchy Land. The purpose of this study was to analyze land management policies in sustainable areas in the regencies (four) villages in Bantul Regency and Sleman Regency. This type of research conducted by the author is a mixed/mixed research (mixed methodology). Data analysis techniques in this study used the Nvivo 12 Plus software, processing by using the Crosstab Query Analysis, Cluster Analysis, Comparasis Diagram Analysis features. The results of research in land management are still not carried out correctly and evenly. Several problems were encountered, such as the absence of road access, missing land boundaries, land parcels occupying other community lands, and conflicts.

Pendataan tanah milik Keraton Yogyakarta atau Sultan Ground (SG) dan tanah Kadipaten Paku Alaman atau Paku Alam Ground (PAG) berjalan lambat karena terkendala aturan yang tumpang tindih. Pendataan tanah Sultan Ground dan Paku Alam Ground yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang Keistimewaan terganjal oleh perubahan status kepemilikan tanah di tingkat desa yang menjadi milik negara dan perorangan. Akibatnya proses sertifikasi oleh Badan Pertanahan Nasional belum bisa dilakukan. Pendataan ini dilandasi Peraturan Daerah Istimewa No 1 Tahun 2017 tentang Pengelolaan dan Pemanfaatan Tanah Kasultanan dan Tanah Kadipaten. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menganalisis kebijakan penataan pertanahan di kawasan berkesinambungan di 4 (empat) desa di Kabupaten Bantul dan Kabupaten Sleman. Jenis penelitian yang dilakukan oleh penulis adalah penelitian campuran/kombinasi (mixed methodology). Teknik analisis data dalam penelitian ini menggunakan software Nvivo 12 Plus, mengolah dengan menggunkan fitur Crosstab Query Analysis, Cluster Analysis, Comparasison Diagram Analysis. Hasil penelitian dalam penataan pertanahan masih belum dilakukan secara baik dan merata, terdapat beberapa permasalahan yang dijumpai seperti tidak adanya akses jalan, batas tanah yang hilang, bidang tanah menempati wilayah tanah masyarakat yang lain, dan konflik.

Keywords

Policy; Land Arrangement; Development; Sustainable Areas

Full Text:

PDF

References

Alemie, B. K., Bennett, R. M. and Zevenbergen, J. (2015) ‘A socio-spatial methodology for evaluating urban land governance: the case of informal settlements’, Journal of Spatial Science, 60(2), pp. 289–309. doi: 10.1080/14498596.2015.1004654.

Arnowo, H. and Handayani, D. T. (2016) ‘Kebijakan Pertanahan pada Era Masyarakat Ekonomi Asean (MEA)’, BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan, 2(2), p. 227. doi: 10.31292/jb.v2i2.73.

Augustinus, C. (2010) ‘Social Tenure Domain Model: What It Can Mean for the Land Industry and for the Poor’, (April), pp. 11–16. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.632.1855&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

Blake, C. (2015) ‘The Application of Geospatial Information – Land Administration and Management’, (July), pp. 1–28. Available at: http://ggim.un.org/meetings/GGIM-committee/documents/GGIM5/land admin and mngnt background paper 3.2 final.pdf.

Boone, C. (2015) ‘Land tenure regimes and state structure in rural Africa: Implications for forms of resistance to large-scale land acquisitions by outsiders’, Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 33(2), pp. 171–190. doi: 10.1080/02589001.2015.1065576.

Bydłosz, J. (2015) ‘The application of the Land Administration Domain Model in building a country profile for the Polish cadastre’, Land Use Policy. Elsevier Ltd, 49, pp. 598–605. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.011.

Chayani, D. A. and Yuliani, F. (2013) ‘IMPLEMENTASI KEBIJAKAN PERTANAHAN (STUDI KASUS PADA BAGIAN PENDAFTARAN TANAH di KECAMATAN TAMPAN KOTA PEKENBARU)’, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), pp. 1689–1699. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.

Davison, J. and Osuch, D. (2009) ‘Land Administration Systems’, Critical Issues in Systems Theory and Practice, (February), pp. 541–544. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-9883-8_82.

Dawidowicz, A., Radzewicz, A. and Renigier-Biłozor, M. (2014) ‘Algorithm for purposes of determining real estate markets efficiency with help of land administration system’, Survey Review, 46(336), pp. 189–204. doi: 10.1179/1752270613Y.0000000080.

Dawidowicz, A. and Źróbek, R. (2017) ‘Land Administration System for Sustainable Development - Case Study of Poland’, Real Estate Management and Valuation, 25(1), pp. 112–122. doi: 10.1515/remav-2017-0008.

Van Doeveren, V. (2011) ‘Rethinking Good Governance: Identifying Common Principles’, Public Integrity, 13(4), pp. 301–318. doi: 10.2753/PIN1099-9922130401.

Grover, R. et al. (2007) Good governance in land administration and land tenure, Land Reform, Land Settlement and Cooperatives. Available at: http://www.cawater-info.net/bk/land_law/files/a1179e00.pdf.

Hilhorst, T. (2008) ‘Local governance institutions for sustainable natural resource management in Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger’, pp. 1–31. Available at: http://www.kit.nl/smartsite.shtml?id=SINGLEPUBLICATION&ItemID=2503.

Kuma, S. S. (2018) ‘Land Policy and Land Delivery System in Nigeria’, Emerging Issues in Urban Land Use and Development, (December 2017), pp. 1–24. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322030158_Land Policy and Land Delivery System in Nigeria.

Manzhynski, S. et al. (2016) ‘Sustainability performance in the Baltic Sea Region’, Land Use Policy, 57, pp. 489–498. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.003.

Marsella (2015) ‘PERSPEKTIF PENANGANAN SENGKETA PERTANAHAN DI BADAN PERTANAHAN NASIONAL’, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), pp. 1689–1699. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.

Maynard, L. and Jacobson, S. K. (2017) ‘Stakeholder Participation in Wildlife Management: Adapting the Nominal Group Technique in Developing Countries for Participants with Low Literacy’, Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 22(1), pp. 71–82. doi: 10.1080/10871209.2016.1225139.

Nugroho, W. (2015) ‘REORIENTASI KEBIJAKAN PEMERINTAH DAERAH DALAM PENERAPAN OTONOMI DAERAH DI BIDANG PERTANAHAN DAN PENATAAN RUANG (THE REORIENTATION OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT POLICY ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REGIONAL AUTONOMY IN THE FIELD OF LAND AND LAND USE)’, pp. 1–19.

Puri, W. H. (2013) ‘KONTEKSTUALITAS AFFIRMATIVE ACTION DALAM KEBIJAKAN PERTANAHAN DI YOGYAKARTA’. Available at: http://jurnalbhumi.stpn.ac.id/index.php/JB/article/download/157/143.

Sugiyono (2018) Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Untuk penelitian yang bersifat eksploratif, enterpretif, interaktif dan konstruktif. Edisi ke-3. Edited by S. Y. Suryandari. Bandung: ALFABETA.

Zevenbergen, J., Vries, W. De and Bennett, R. (2016) Advances in responsible land administration, Journal of Spatial Science. doi: 10.1080/14498596.2016.1145619.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/jgcs.v4i2.2573