Towards an Integration of Immigration and Customs Agency in Indonesia: A Step-by-Step Process
Abstract
Some challenges appear in this issue that the Indonesian border agencies indicate weaknesses in coordination, fragmented policy instruments, and disputes in implementing laws. There has little evidence in the previous study about the integration of border agencies in Indonesia and perspectives on the establishment of immigration and customs agencies. The questions may arise how important is the integrated border agencies is in the reform agenda in public sectors and bureaucracy from the perspectives of border officers. This study is to figure out the perspectives of border officers on the integration of two border authorities in Indonesia and what the ideal integration should be. This paper provides solutions for some issues of border protection in Indonesia with survey research and a step-by-step process of integration. This paper finds most immigration and customs officers at border controls exposed the importance of an integration initiative between the Directorate General of Immigration (DGI) and Directorate General of Customs and Excise (DGCE) in Indonesia through the Integrated Border Management (IBM) strategy. Therefore, initiating the integration of institutions between the Directorate General of Immigration and Directorate General of Customs and Excise, such as ICA Singapore or ABF Australia is more ideal border agencies rather than a joint-task force.
Permasalahan di instansi pemerintah yang menangani perbatasan di Indonesia masih terjadi seperti adanya kelemahan dalam koordinasi, terdapat instrumen kebijakan yang terpisah-pisah, dan terjadinya tumpang tindih dalam penegakan hukum. Penelitian sebelumnya tentang inisiasi integrasi instansi di perbatasan Indonesia masih sangat minim terutama penggabungan dua otoritas perbatasan seperti imigrasi dan bea cukai. Pertanyannya adalah seberapa penting penggabungan dua otoritas perbatasan tersebut dalam rangka agenda reformasi birokrasi di sektor publik dari perspektif petugas perbatasan. Studi ini menggunakan penelitian survei dengan melihat perspektif dari petugas perbatasan terhadap integrasi dua otoritas perbatasan di Indonesia dan bagaimana seharusnya bentuk ideal penggabungan tersebut. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sebagian besar petugas imigrasi dan kepabeanan menyatakan sangat setuju dengan inisiasi penggabungan Direktorat Jenderal Imigrasi dan Direktorat Jenderal Bea dan Cukai dengan menerapkan strategi manajemen perbatasan terintegrasi (IBM). Integrasi dua tersebut dalam bentuk badan baru seperti ICA Singapore atau ABF Australia ketimbang tim atau gugus tugas yang bersifat sementaraKeywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Arifin, R., Nurkumalawati, I., & Briando, B. (2019). The Theoretical Perspectives of Immigration Controls: Immigration Clearance Process, Selective Policy and Security Apporach at Airports in Indonesia In Second International Conference on Multidisciplinary Academic Research (pp. 251-260). Sydney: Asia Pacific Institute of Advanced Research
Bogdanor, V. (2005). Joined-up government (Vol. 5): Oxford University Press.
Bossong, R., & Carrapico, H. (2016). EU Borders and Shifting Internal Security Technology, Externalization and Accountability (1st ed. 2016. ed.): Cham : Springer International Publishing : Imprint: Springer.
BPS. (2018). Jumlah kunjungan wisman ke Indonesia Agustus 2018 Retrieved from https://www.bps.go.id/
Broeders, D., & Hampshire, J. (2013). Dreaming of Seamless Borders: ICTs and the Pre-Emptive Governance of Mobility in Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39(8), 1201-1218. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2013.787512
Carayannopoulos, G. (2017). Whole of Government: the Solution to Managing Crises? Australian Journal of Public Administration, 76(2), 251-265.
Chia, Y., Heng, W., Goh, L., & Ang, C. (2019). Job Competencies of Border Security Officers in Singapore. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 1-13.
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2007). The whole‐of‐government approach to public sector reform. Public Administration Review, 67(6), 1059-1066.
Das, S. B. (2017). ASEAN single window: Advancing trade facilitation for regional integration.
Duez, D. (2016). A Community of Borders, Borders of Community: The EU's Integrated Border Management Strategy. In E. Vallet (Ed.), Borders, fences and walls: State of insecurity? (pp. 51-66). London: Routledge.
European Commision: Guidelines for integrated border management in the Western Balkans. (2004). In. Europe: European Commission.
Guidelines for Integrated Border Management in the Western Balkans (2007). Europe Retrieved from https://www.legislationline.org/download/id/3647/file/EC%20Guidelines%20for%20Integrated%20Border%20Management%20in%20the%20Western%20Balkans%202007.pdf
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long range planning, 46(1-2), 1-12.
Hiller, H. H. (2010). Airports as borderlands: American preclearance and transitional spaces in Canada. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 25(3-4), 19-30.
Jack, J. (2018). E-government in Vanuatu: a whole-of-government approach. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 40(4), 228-234.
Keputusan Menteri Hukum dan HAM No.M.HH-02.GR.02.02 Tahun 2020 tentang Tempat Pemeriksaan Imigrasi.
Koslowski, R. (2003). Information technology and integrated border management. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Workshop on Managing International and Inter-Agency Cooperation at the Border.
Kunz, R., Lavenex, S., & Panizzon, M. (2011). Multilayered migration governance: The promise of partnership (Vol. 89): Taylor & Francis.
Olsen, G. R. (2013). Whole-of-government approaches to fragile states in Africa. Third World Quarterly, 34(10), 1828-1842.
Pollitt, C. (2003). Joined-up government: a survey. Political studies review, 1(1), 34-49.
Undang-Undang No.6 Tahun 2011 tentang Keimigrasian Indonesia.
Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2006 tentang Kepabeanan.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/jgcs.v5i1.2990
Article Metrics
Abstract - 2218 PDF - 931Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Journal of Government and Civil Society is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License .