The Transparency Honorary Board of Election Organizers in The Violations Trial of The Election Ethics Code Organizers in Indonesia

Lulu Qurrata A'yun, Nuryanti Mustari, Ahmad Harakan, Nursaleh Hartaman

Abstract


ABSTRACT

The spirit of the Election Organizing Honorary Council in supporting the disclosure of public information in terms of handling violations of the election organizers’ code of ethics has been seen since 2017. This study aims to determine the transparency carried out by the Election Organizers Honorary Council in Enforcement of the Code of Ethics for Election Organizers in Indonesia. The research method used is descriptive qualitative by conducting in-depth interviews with several key informants from election organizers in Indonesia with data analysis techniques using nvivo 12 plus software. The results of the study show that the Openness of the honorary election organizers council has maximized the disclosure of public information in the implementation of the trial for violations of the election organizers’ code of ethics by doing live streaming in every trial process. Furthermore, informative indicators have also been applied in implementing the transparency of election organizers by providing easy and complete access to information. Then the disclosure of the court’s decision on the enforcement of the code of ethics is carried out in real time according to the day the case decision is issued.

 

Keywords: Transparency, election organizers, openness of public information

 

ABSTRAK

Semangat Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu dalam mendukung keterbukaan informasi public dalam hal penanganan pelanggaran kode etik penyelenggara pemilu telah terlihat sejak tahun 2017. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui transparansi yang dilakukan oleh Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu dalam Penegakan Kode etik penyelenggara pemilu di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kualitatif deskriptif dengan melakukan wawancara secara mendalam dengan beberapa informan kunci dari penyelenggara pemilu di Indonesia dengan Teknik analisis data menggunakan software Nvivo 12 plus. Hasil penelitian menujukkan Opennes (keterbukaan) Dewan kehormatan penyelenggara pemilu telah memaksimalkan keterbukaan informasi publik dalam pelaksanaan persidangan pelanggaran kode etik penyelenggara pemilu dengan melakukan live streaming disetiap proses persidangan. Selanjutnya indicator informative juga telah diterapkan dalam pelaksanaan transparansi penyelenggara pemilu dengan menyediakan akses informasi yang mudah dan lengkap. Kemudian indicator disclosure atau pengungkapan hasil putusan persidangan penegakan kode etik dilakukan secara real time sesuai dengan hari dikeluarkannya putusan perkara.

 

Kata Kunci: Transparansi, penyelenggara Pemilu, keterbukaan informasi publik


Keywords


Transparency; Open Government; Election Organizers

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aker, J. C., Collier, P., & Vicente, P. C. (2017). Is Information Power? Using Mobile Phones and Free Newspapers during an Election in Mozambique. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 99(2), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00611

Dewi, E. P. (2018). Good Governance Dan Transparansi Rencana Strategi Terwujudnya Akuntabilitas Kinerja Pemerintah. Jurnal Lentera Bisnis, 7(2), 81. https://doi.org/10.34127/jrlab.v7i2.236

DKPP, H. (2021). Live Streaming Sidang Dkpp, Alfitra: Dkpp Siap Diawasi Masyarakat.

Eom, S.-J., Hwang, H., & Kim, J. H. (2018). Can social media increase government responsiveness? A case study of Seoul, Korea. Government Information Quarterly, 35(1), 109–122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.10.002

Evans, A. M., & Campos, A. (2013). Open Government Initiative: Challenges of Citizen Participation. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32(1), 172–185. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42001520

Gomez, E. T. (2012). Monetizing politics: Financing parties and elections in Malaysia. Modern Asian Studies, 46(5), 1370–1397.

Gorbata, L. P. (2020). Foreign Experience Of Information Openness In The Activities Of Public Authorities. Austrian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(1–2), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.29013/AJH-20-1.2-51-57

Halberstam, M. (2015). Beyond Transparency: Rethinking Election Reform from an Open Government Perspective.

Haro-de-rosario, A., Sáez-martín, A., & Caba-pérez, M. C. (2018). Using social media to enhance citizen engagement with local government : Twitter or Facebook ? https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816645652

Harrison, T. M., & Sayogo, D. S. (2014). Transparency, participation, and accountability practices in open government: A comparative study. Government Information Quarterly, 31(4), 513–525. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.08.002

Isaura, G. (2020). Kemitraan Global untuk Transparansi Pemerintah: Rencana Aksi Open Government Indonesia. PETANDA: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Dan Humaniora, 2(2), 58–66.

Kapahang, S. E., Mingkid, E., & Kalesaran, E. R. (2020). KETERBUKAAN INFORMASI PUBLIK PADA DINAS KOMINFO PEMERINTAH KABUPATEN MINAHASA TENGGARA. ACTA DIURNA KOMUNIKASI, 2(1).

Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.

Lean, M. L., & Don, Z. M. (2010). “ Ink Me ”: A Representation of Transparency in Election Administration 2 . A Brief History of the Political Scene in Malaysia. Chhss, 26–28.

Lee, G., & Kwak, Y. H. (2012). An Open Government Maturity Model for social media-based public engagement. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 492–503. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.001

Nurdin, A. H. M. (2019). Menuju pemerintahan terbuka (open government) melalui penerapan e-government. Jurnal MP (Manajemen Pemerintahan), 5(1), 1–17.

Patrick, A. (2018). The Role of Information and Communication Technology ( ICT ) in the 2015 Presidential Election of Nigeria. 38, 1–7.

Rahmadana, M. F., Mawati, A. T., Siagian, N., Perangin-angin, M. A., Refelino, J., Tojiri, M. Y., Siagian, V., Nugraha, N. A., Manullang, S. O., & Silalahi, M. (2020). Pelayanan Publik. Yayasan Kita Menulis.

Retnowati, E. (2012). Keterbukaan informasi publik dan good governance (antara das sein dan das sollen). Perspektif, 17(1), 54–61.

Robertson, G. (2017). Political Orientation , Information and Perceptions of Election Fraud : Evidence from Russia. May, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123415000356

Sassetti, F. (2019). Social Media and Crowdsourced Election Monitoring : Prospects for Election Transparency in Sub-Saharan Africa. 42(September), 7–39.

Sjoberg, F. M. (2014). Autocratic adaptation: The strategic use of transparency and the persistence of election fraud. Electoral Studies, 33, 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2013.08.004

Surbakti, R., & Supriyanto, D. (2013). Partisipasi warga masyarakat dalam proses penyelenggaran pemilihan umum.

Wang, H., & Lo, J. (2015). Adoption of open government data among government agencies. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.11.004

Woolf, N. H., & Silver, C. (2017). Qualitative analysis using NVivo: The five-level QDA® method. Routledge.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/jgcs.v6i1.5776

Article Metrics

Abstract - 1129 PDF - 484

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Government and Civil Society

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


 

Journal of Government and Civil Society is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License .