Economic Analysis Relationship in Determining The Size of Parliamentary Threshold in Indonesia

Sholahuddin Al-Fatih

Abstract


This research tries to discuss the relationship of economic factors in the establishment of a legal norm. Through conceptual and statutory approaches, this study tries to examine the concept of the relationship between economics and the law initiated by Richard A. Posner. This research makes the establishment of the norm on the size of the parliamentary threshold in the implementation of legislative elections as a benchmark for the relationship between the economy and the law. The results of this study show that changes in the size of the parliamentary threshold can be understood as an open legal policy agreed upon by lawmakers. The existence of rules on open legal policy makes economic and legal relations in determining the norms of parliamentary threshold size become real. This research is expected to help academics and legal practitioners to dig deeper into the relationship between economics and law, so as to understand the advantages and disadvantages that may result from such relationships.


Keywords


Law; Economy, Parliamentary Threshold

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adelina, A. (2018). RELEVANSI AMBANG BATAS PARLEMEN (PARLIAMENTARY THRESHOLD) DENGAN SISTEM PRESIDENSIAL DI INDONESIA (Universitas Islam Indonesia). Retrieved from https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/5874

Al-Fatih, S. (2019). Akibat Hukum Regulasi tentang Threshold dalamPemilihan Umum Legislatif dan Pemilihan Presiden: Kajian Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 52/PUU-X/2012 dan Nomor 14/PUU-XI/2013. Jurnal Yudisial, 12(1), 17–38. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v12i1.258

Alghaffar, M. (2020). ANALISIS YURIDIS KOMPARATIF PARLIAMENTARY THRESHOLD DALAM UNDANGUNDANG NOMOR 7 TAHUN 2017 TENTANG PEMILIHAN UMUM DENGAN UNDANG-UNDANG TERKAIT DI ERA REFORMASI (Universitas Negeri Semarang). Retrieved from https://lib.unnes.ac.id/38249/

Andreas, M. N., & Laracaka, R. (2019). Analisa Ekonomi terhadap Hukum dalam Pemidanaan Partai Politik melalui Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi dalam Perkara Tipikor. Jurnal Antikorupsi, 5(1), 127–167.

Baskan, F. & A. G. (2012). Turkey’s June 2011 Parliamentary Elections. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 14(1), 165–174. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2012.656983

Coleman, J. L. (1980). Efficiency, Exchange, and Auction: Philosophical Aspects of the Eco nomic Approach to Law. California Review, 88.

Cooter, R. T. U. (2000). Law and Economics (3rd ed.). Addison Wisiey Longman Inc.

Effendi, A. (2017). Studi Komparatif Pengaturan Sistem Pemilihan Umum Anggota Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Di Indonesia. Fiat Justisia, 10(2), 295–316. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v10no2.746

Eide, Erling. Paul H. Rubin, J. M. S. (2006). Economics of Crime: Foundations and Trends in Microeconomics. Massachusets: Now Publisher.

Fatih, S. Al. (2018). Implementasi Parliamentary Threshold Dalam Pemilihan Anggota Dprd Provinsi Dan Dprd Kabupaten/Kota. Ahkam: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.21274/ahkam.2018.6.2.363-388

Firdaus, S. (2011). Relevansi Parliamentary Threshold Terhadap Pelaksanaan Pemilu Yang Demokratis. Jurnal Konstitusi, 8(2), 91–112.

Ginting, F. P. P., & Saragih, A. (2018). Ilusi Demokrasi Substansial di Indonesia: Sebuah Kritik Terhadap Implementasi Parliamentary Treshlod. Politeia: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 10(2), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.32734/politeia.v10i2.630

Harnay, S., & Marciano, A. (2009). Posner, economics and the law: From “law and economics” to an economic analysis of law. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 31(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1053837209090208

Himawan, C. (1991). Pendekatan Ekonomi terhadap Hukum sebagai Sarana Pengembalian Wibawa Hukum. Hukum Dan Pembangunan, 21(5), 421–445.

Mietzner, M. (2020). Authoritarian innovations in Indonesia: electoral narrowing, identity politics and executive illiberalism. Democratization, 27(6), 1021–1036. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1704266

Mouliza K.D Sweinstani. (2019). Formula Konversi Suara Saint Lague dan Dampaknya pada Sistem Kepartaian: Evaluasi Pemilu Serentak 2019. Jurnal Penelitian Politik (LIPI), 16(2), 111–124. Retrieved from http://ejournal.politik.lipi.go.id/index.php/jpp/article/view/812/549

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2014). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2017). Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi (Cetakan ke). Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?id=CKZADwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Marzuki,+Peter+Mahmud,+(2014),+Penelitian+Hukum,+Cetakan+ke-9,+Jakarta:+Kencana+Media+Group.&hl=id&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiNlIjqlbTpAhXWWisKHWktCXAQ6AEIMjAB#v=onepage&q&f=false

Posner, R. (1985). An Economic Theory of The Criminal Law. Columbia Law Review, 85(6).

Rismawati, S. D. (2015). Menebarkan Keadilan Sosial dengan Hukum Progresif di Era Komodifikasi Hukum. Jurnal Hukum Islam, 13(1), 1–12.

Tata Strata, Hufron, S. S. (2019). AMBANG BATAS PARLEMEN (PERLIAMENTARY THRESHOLD) DAN ASAS DEMOKRASI. Jurnal Akrab Juara, 4(5), 229–245. Retrieved from http://akrabjuara.com/index.php/akrabjuara/article/view/880/781

Veijanovski, C. (1990). The Economics of Law: An introductory Text. The Institute of Economic Affairs.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/ijlp.v1i2.3176

Article Metrics

Abstract - 523 PDF - 558

DOI (PDF): http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/ijlp.v1i2.3176.g1988

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.