COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF PT. BANK SYARIAH INDONESIA AND PT. BANK MANDIRI (PERSERO) AS THE PARENT AND CONTROLLING SHAREHOLDERS OF THE COMPANY

syukron sazly, Herudini Subariyanti, Andri Rizko Yulianto, Aliffah Kusumaningrum, Joko Ariawan, Dirgahayu Erri

Abstract


The desire for a new business line to increase new income is one of the goals of conventional banks opening Islamic business units (UUS) or Islamic Commercial Banks (BUS). This goal will be achieved if the transfer of knowledge (marketing knowledge, technological knowledge and experience) and commitment to increasing resources (human resources, capital, infrastructure) from the parent company to the subsidiary companies goes well. In fact, the market share of Islamic banking is still very small compared to the conventional industry, only recorded at 7.09% and there is a large discrepancy in the performance of Islamic Business Units and Islamic Commercial Banks compared to the performance of their parent companies. The author is interested in conducting this research, with the consideration that Bank Syariah Indonesia (BSI) is the largest Islamic bank and Bank Mandiri as the holding company and controlling shareholder. The author wants to know how the performance comparison of both. Supposedly if shareholder commitment is high to its subsidiaries, then total assets, equity, net income and financial performance ratios in this case CAR, NPL, NIM, ROA, BOPO and LDR are not much different. The sample data is the financial performance of BSI and Bank Mandiri as of Quarter I 2021 to Quarter IV 2022. The columnogorov-smirnov test is used to test data normality and independent sample t-test to test hypotheses, with the SPSS 25 program. As a result, there is no simultaneous significant differences between BSI and Bank Mandiri in CAR, NPL, NIM, ROA, BOPO and LDR or all financial performance indicators, but partially there are significant differences for all of these financial performance indicators


Full Text:

PDF

References


Arinta, Y. N. (2016). Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Keuangan antara Bank Syariah dan Bank Konvensional (Studi Kasus pada Bank Syariah Mandiri dan Bank Mandiri). Muqtasid: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Perbankan Syariah, 7(1), 119. https://doi.org/10.18326/muqtasid.v7i1.119-140

Avissa, Luk Luk, & Aryanto. (2018). NALISIS PENILAIAN TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE RGEC PADA BANK UMUM SWASTA NASIONAL DEVISA YANG TERDAFTAR DI BEI. AKUNTABILITAS: JURNAL PENELITIAN DAN PENGEMBANGAN AKUNTANSI Vol. 12 N2018o. 1 Januari 2018, 12(20180).

Darmawan, P, P. . . (2018). .). Analisis Kinerja Bank Umum Syariah dengan Metode Risiko Berdasarkan Peringkat Bank (RBBR) untuk Mengetahui Tingkat Kesehatan Bank. Jurnal Administrasi Dan Bisnis, 56 (2), 127–136.

Dendawijaya, L. (2015). Manajemen Perbankan. PT.Ghalia Indonesia.

Febrianto, H. G., & Fitriana, A. I. (2021). Menilai Tingkat Kesehatan Bank dengan Analisis Metode Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, Capital pada pada Bank Syariah di Indonesia. Banque Syar'i: Jurnal llmiah Perbankan Syariah, 7(1).

Febrianto, H. G., & Fitriana, A. I. (2020, December). Mengukur Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Negara Indonesia Syariah (BNI Syariah) dengan Bank Negara Indonesia (BNI) dengan Metode RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning dan Capital). In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian LPPM UMJ (Vol. 2020).

Indonesia, B. (2012). Kodifikasi Peraturan Bank Indonesia Kelembagaan Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank. https://docplayer.info/32766810-Kodifikasi-peraturan-bank-indonesia-kelembagaan- penilaian-tingkat-kesehatan-bank.html

MIDE, S. (2022). ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN LAPORAN KEUANGAN TEHADAPKINERJA BANK SYARIAH INDONESIA (BSI) MELALUI PENDEKATAN INCOME STATEMENT DAN VALUE ADDED STETMENT. In IAIN Pare Pare (Vol. 33, Issue 1).

OJK-RI. (2021). Peraturan OJK-Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Umum dan Bank Syariah. https://www.ojk.go.id/id/Default.aspx

Putri, R. D., Utari, V., Arisandi, D., & Wahyuni, E. S. (2021). Perbandingan Tingkat Kesehatan Kinerja BCA Konvensional Dan BCA Syariah Dengan Metode RGEC Study Program of Islamic Banking Faculty of Islamic Economis and Business, UIN Fatmawati Soekarno. Journal Ekombis Review, 9(2), 327–344. https://jurnal.unived.ac.id/index.php/er/indexDOI:https://doi.org/10.37676/ekombis.v9i2.1450

Raizar Rachmi Revindaliza. (2021). PENGARUH STRATEGI BISNIS DAN CORPORTE GOVERNANCE TERHADAP MANAJEMEN LABA DENGAN KINERJA PERUSAHAAN SEBAGAI VARIABEL INTERVENING (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Manufaktur di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) 2016– 2018 [Universitas Islam Indonesia]. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/31747/15312130 Raizar Rachmi Revindaliza.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Respati, A. R. (223 C.E.). No Title. https://money.kompas.com/read/2023/04/12/141000026/pangsa-pasar-perbankan-syariah-masih-kecil-ojk-bangun-ekosistem-dan-dorong?page=all

Riadi, Anantawikrama Tungga Atmadja, & Wahyuni, M. A. (2016). PENILAIAN TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE RGEC (RISK PROFILE, GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, EARNINGS, DAN CAPITAL) PADA PT. BANK MANDIRI (PERSERO), TBK PERIODE 2013-2015. JIMAT (Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Akuntansi) Undiksha, 6(3).

Santoso, S. (2014). Statistik Parametrik (Edisi Revi). Elex Media.

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, R&D. IKAPI.

Taswan. (n.d.). Manajemen Perbankan (Edisi Kedu). UPP STIM YKPN.

Wardana, L. K., & Nurita, C. D. (2022). Analisis Komparasi Kinerja Keuangan PT. Bank Syariah Indonesia Sebelum dan Setelah Merger. Jati: Jurnal Akuntansi Terapan Indonesia, 5(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.18196/jati.v5i1.13668




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/dmj.v7i3.8919

Article Metrics

Abstract - 588 PDF - 573

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Jurnal ini telah terindeks dalam:


googleGaruda crossref dimention



Office:
Editor of Dynamic Management Journal (DMJ) UMT, Building F, 3rd Floor, Department Management Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitiy Of Muhammadiyah Tangerang
Jl. Perintis Kemerdekaan I No.33, RT.007/RW.003, Babakan, Cikokol, Kec. Tangerang, Kota Tangerang, Banten 15118

Wa08567312111 (Galuh), 085716034977 (Eky)
Email: dynamic@gmail.com 


Dynamic management journal is licensed under Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International