- Focus and Scope
- Section Policies
- Peer Review Process
- Publication Frequency
- Open Access Policy
- Policy of Screening for Plagiarism
- Licensing (Creative Commons) and Archiving
- Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
Focus and Scope
This journal accepts only research result (both qualitative and quantitative research) and literature review of English studies, and the focus of the research are
1. English Education
2. English Skill
3. Linguistics and Culture
Section Policies
Articles
Open Submissions | Indexed | Peer Reviewed |
Peer Review Process
The Journal operates a peer review process and promotes double-blind reviewing.
Publication Frequency
Globish is academic journal published by English education study program of University Muhammadiyah Tangerang.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/globish.v6i2
ISSN:2301-9913
E-ISSN:2597-9132
Globish publishes two times a year (January & July)
Open Access Policy
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Policy of Screening for Plagiarism
Papers submitted to Globish: An English-Indonesian Journal for English, Education, and Culture will be screened for plagiarism using Plagiarism Checker X plagiarism detection tools. Globish: An English-Indonesian Journal for English, Education, and Culture will immediately reject papers leading to plagiarism or self-plagiarism.
Before submitting articles to reviewers, those are first checked for similarity/plagiarism tool, by a member of the editorial team. The papers submitted to Globish: An English-Indonesian Journal for English, Education, and Culture must have similarity level less than 20%.
Plagiarism is the exposing of another person’s thoughts or words as though they were your own, without without permission, credit, or acknowledgment, or because of failing to cite the sources properly. Plagiarism can take diverse forms, from literal copying to paraphrasing the work of another. In order to properly judge whether an author has plagiarized, we emphasize the following possible situations:
- An author can literally copy another author’s work- by copying word by word, in whole or in part, without permission, acknowledge or citing the original source. This practice can be identified through comparing the original source and the manuscript/work who is suspected of plagiarism.
- Substantial copying implies for an author to reproduce a substantial part of another author, without permission, acknowledge or citation. The substantial term can be understood both in terms of quality as quantity, being often used in the context of Intellectual property. Quality refers to the relative value of the copied text in proportion to the work as a whole.
- Paraphrasing involves taking ideas, words or phrases from a source and crafting them into new sentences within the writing. This practice becomes unethical when the author does not properly cite or does not acknowledge the original work/author. This form of plagiarism is the more difficult form to be identified.
Licensing (Creative Commons) and Archiving
This journal allows reuse and remixing of its content, in accordance with a CC BY SA. This license lets others distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon your work, even commercially, as long as they credit you for the original creation.
Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
The Editors of Globish, : An English-Indonesian journal for English, education and culture, issue a set of publication ethics as guidelines for authors engaged in the publication of scientific research to comply with COPE practices and establish a high-quality standard of ethics for journal publication. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines.
A. Authorship
Authors are expected to comply with the following ethical guidelines. Any infringement may lead to a retraction of the article or even ban the author from journal publication.
- The author’s main obligation is to deliver accurate and complete details of the research performed. The research data should contain sufficient information on the related subject.
- Authors should ensure the originality of their work and that neither fraud nor fabrication is involved in their manuscript.
- Authors should guarantee that the article has not been published previously or is not being evaluated for publication elsewhere.
- Authors should ensure that their works do not contain any unlawful statements and/or any comments that may violate the law.
- Authors are aware of and abide by the misconduct policy.
B. Editorship
- Editors should provide a fair judgment and consideration to all manuscripts based on its quality with no regard to race, religion, nationality, sex, seniority, or institutional affiliation of the author(s).
- Editors are responsible to consider all the submitted manuscripts in a reasonable time frame.
- Editors, with their expertise and fair judgment, are responsible to accept or reject the manuscripts. They are to build good communication with authors in regard to the manuscript’s publication. The final decision will be accompanied by the reviewer’s comment
- Editors shall make sure no private information of authors is included in the manuscript sent to reviewers
- Editors should ensure the confidentiality of the submitted manuscript and not disclose any information about the manuscript under consideration to other parties
- Editors are to respect the author’s request to not use certain reviewers – with a well-reasoned objection - to consider their manuscript. However, editors can decide to use one or more of these reviewers if their professional input is considered to be important for the manuscript’s publication
- Editors are to comply with COPE practices when considering a manuscript for publication.
C. ReviewerProcess
All papers will be critically examined by at least two anonymous reviewers, selected for their competencies in the subject of GLOBISH : AN ENGLISH-INDONESIAN JOURNAL FOR ENGLISH, EDUCATION AND CULTURE aim scope of the paper. Acceptance of the paper will depend upon its scientific merit and suitability for the Globish : An English-Indonesian journal for English, education and culture. A paper may be accepted in its original form, subject to revision, or rejection.
The reviewers’ (and editors’) suggestions will be conveyed to the author, who will then have an opportunity to revise the paper. A manuscript returned to an author for revision can be held for a maximum of four weeks. Accepted papers will not be charged a publication fee.
All submitted papers will be checked for their originalities by means of iThenticate/Turnitin.
Reviewers are to comply with the following ethical guidelines:
- The main obligation of a reviewer (referee) is to objectively judge the complete manuscript both scientifically and literally in high standards
- Referees should treat the submitted manuscript as confidential documents
- The referee’s identity should be remained anonymous–unless if the editors decided otherwise.
- Referees should complete the evaluation of a manuscript in a reasonable time frame and directly inform the editors when the work could not be completed within the schedule.
- Reviewers should explain and provide adequate professional judgment for their evaluation of a manuscript.
- Reviewers are to promptly notify the editors should they find the manuscript is expected to be misapplied by others to pose a threat to public health and safety.
D. Conflict of Interest Policy
Authors, Editors, and Reviewers are expected to adhere to the following guidelines in compliance with COPE practices.
- Authors should clearly inform their source of financial support -institution, private, and/or corporate- for their research
- In case the author and editor of Globish : An English-Indonesian journal for English, education and culture have a relationship, which may lead to an unfair evaluation, another editor will be appointed instead.
- Reviewers should be aware of any appearance of a conflict of interest when receiving a manuscript for evaluation and are required to promptly return the manuscript to the editor, informing the conflict-of-interest issue.
E. Data and Responsibility
Data availability and reporting guidelines are available in the 'Author Guidelines section.
F. Research Misconduct Policy
The purpose of this policy is to prevent any misconduct related to research conducted for the journals and to suggest the fundamental principles and structural procedures in relation to research integrity deliberation required to ensure research ethics.
The range of misconduct policy
Research misconduct suggested in this policy pertains to fraud and refers to data fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, and improper authorship.
- "Fabrication" refers to any activity involving the creation of false information about non-existing data or findings.
- "Falsification" refers to the artificial manipulation of the research materials/equipment/process or random modification/deletion of data resulting in distorted research contents or research results.
- "Plagiarism" refers to acts of pirating others’ ideas, research contents, and research results without justifiable approvals or quotations.
- "Improper authorship" refers to cases where the person who has contributed to research contents or research results is scientifically and technically unqualified as an author or where someone who has not contributed to the research contents or research results scientifically and technically but has been listed as an author merely to express gratitude or courtesy
- Intentional acts to disturb a fraud investigation about themselves or others or acts which can be harmful to informants
- Unfair evaluation regarding research of others or disclosure or pirating of research ideas or research results acquired during the evaluation process.
- Severely aberrant acts that cannot be accepted in the community of the field of science and technology.
How does the journal address misconduct?
Editors and publishers have an ethical obligation to:
- Support the quality and ethics of the review process (pre-publication: weed out; prevent)
- Ensure the correctness of the published literature (post-publication: correct; communicate)
- Educate (prevent)
Editors/journals have an ethical obligation to respond and to address ethical allegations that may arise about published papers or papers in review. Systems and procedures are in place for investigating and addressing situations of misconduct, including cooperation with investigations from institutions or funding bodies.
Possible sanction
When the evidence of misconduct is confirmed, the following procedures are to be applied:
- Prior to publication (during review): The manuscript can be withdrawn from review
- Post-publication (literature correction) The journal may publish a Retraction, Note of Editorial Concern, Errata/Correction with the author or all authors’ signature or editorial of an appropriate statement about the situation. The paper can be “marked” in the literature
- Editors determine whether retract or correct after considering whether the case is fraud or an honest mistake. They consider the intent and then the extent to which the data is incorrect/misleading
- Editors may, in some cases, provide information for other editors/publishers.
- Editors may publish an editorial in the journal to discuss the issue generally and raise awareness of the issue.
G. Ethical Oversight
All submitted articles and exchanging information involving authors and editors in Globish : An English-Indonesian journal for English, education and culture will be considered confidential. Communications related to the publication process should not be disclosed on any website without prior consent from the editors.
The names and email addresses entered in the Globish : An English-Indonesian journal for English, education and culture site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.
Regarding research involving experiments on animals, the authors should ensure that the object is fully assessed in terms of any harm to the animals. This involves a detailed examination of the particular procedures and experiments, and the numbers and types of animals used. The animals subjected to the experiment are to adhere to institutional and national guidelines. The manuscripts are required to declare that all efforts were performed to reduce animal suffering.
H. Intellectual Properties
Disclaimer
The viewpoint of articles published in Globish : An English-Indonesian journal for English, education and culture are solely the authors’ and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial boards.
Copyright
The author is responsible for acquiring permission(s) to reproduce any copyrighted figures, tables, data, or text that are being used in the submitted paper. Authors should note that text quotations of more than 250 words from a published or copyrighted work will require a grant of permission from the original publisher to reprint. The written permission letter(s) must be submitted together with the manuscript.
Publishing
This journal uses Open Journal System which is a journal management and publishing software developed, supported, and distributed by the Public Knowledge Project (PKP).
I. Journal Management
Online: This Journal is available online and can be accessed for free
Charges: Publication in this journal is through the Article Processing Charge scheme and all published papers are available online through open access.
J. Post Publication - Discussion and Correction
Globish : An English-Indonesian journal for English, education and culture follows the guidance from COPE in regard to ethical concerns for published articles. Complaints and Appeal Editor in Chief email at globish_journal@umt.ac.id is available for contact should the authors have an objection or disagreement pertaining to the publication process in Globish : An English-Indonesian journal for English, education and culture. Every complaint will be acknowledged and handled to resolve the issue accordingly. In addition, articles may be retracted due to both scientific and/or ethical reasons, which can be requested by the author(s) or by the Editor. Articles that are found to be seriously flawed or violated ethical guidance from COPE will be retracted in order to correct the scientific record. The retracted article will be noticed on the journal's website alongside information regarding the reason for the retraction.