Journal of Government and Civil Society

Articles

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): Journal of Government and Civil Society (April)

Investigating E-Government Adoption: The Intention to Use MyASN Application by Indonesian National Civil Service Agency (NCSA)

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31000/jgcs.v8i1.10890
Submitted
9 February 2024
Published
7 May 2024

Abstract

This study investigates the implementation of e-government initiatives in Indonesia, specifically focusing on the MyASN application designed for civil servants. Despite the introduction of MyASN, challenges persist in terms of user acceptance, and its complete utilization among civil servants throughout Indonesia is yet to be achieved. The primary goal of this research is to comprehensively identify the factors influencing the adoption of MyASN among civil servants using Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of The Technology (UTAUT) conceptual model. The target population is respondents who use the MyASN application. The target population is respondents who use the MyASN application. This research obtained a total of 182 respondents who filled out the questionnaire via Google Forms, which were then analyzed using the Structural Equation Model (SEM) approach with SmartPLS software. The findings highlight that behavioral intention, performance expectation, and social influence are factors influencing users' intention to use the My-ASN application. On the other hand, effort expectancy and facilitating condition don’t affect users' intention and behavior in adopting MyASN. Furthermore, concerning moderating variables, only working experience and voluntariness of use influence user behavior, although their impacts are not very significant.

 

Penelitian ini mengkaji terkait implementasi e-government di Indonesia, khususnya berfokus pada aplikasi MyASN yang dirancang untuk Aparatur Sipil Negara (ASN). Meskipun aplikasi MyASN ini telah disosialisasikan, namun pada implementasinya masih terdapat tantangan dalam penerimaan penggunanya dan pemanfaatannya yang belum maksimal di kalangan ASN di seluruh Indonesia. Tujuan utama dari penelitian ini adalah mengidentifikasi faktor apa saja yang mempengaruhi niat pengguna untuk menggunakan aplikasi MyASN menggunakan metode UTAUT (Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of The Technology). Target populasi adalah responden yang menggunakan aplikasi MyASN. Penelitian ini memperoleh sebanyak 182 responden yang mengisi kuisioner melalui Google Forms, kemudian dilakukan analisis menggunakan pendekatan SEM (Structural Equation Model) dengan perangkat lunak SmartPLS. Temuan penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwa behavioral intention, performance expectation, dan social influence merupakan faktor yang mempengaruhi niat pengguna dalam menggunakan aplikasi My-ASN. Disisi lain, effort expectancy dan facilitating condition tidak mempengaruhi niat dan perilaku pengguna dalam mengadopsi MyASN. Selain itu, pada moderating varible, hanya working experience dan voluntariness of use yang mempengaruhi perilaku pengguna, meskipun dampaknya tidak terlalu signifikan.

References

  1. Abdullah, P. P., Rahmawati, R., Sensuse, D. I., Lusa, S., Arief, A., & Adi, P. (2022). Evaluasi Kualitas Layanan E-Government Pada Aplikasi Pendaftaran Seleksi Calon Aparatur Sipil Negara Menggunakan Model E-GovQual Berdasarkan Perspektif Pengguna. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Ilmu Komputer, 9(6), 1297. https://doi.org/10.25126/jtiik.2022956130
  2. Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x
  3. Akinnuwesi, B. A., Uzoka, F. M. E., Fashoto, S. G., Mbunge, E., Odumabo, A., Amusa, O. O., Okpeku, M., & Owolabi, O. (2022). A modified UTAUT model for the acceptance and use of digital technology for tackling COVID-19. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3(December 2021), 118–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2021.12.001
  4. Al Sayegh, A. J., Ahmad, S. Z., AlFaqeeh, K. M., & Singh, S. K. (2023). Factors affecting e-government adoption in the UAE public sector organisations: the knowledge management perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(3), 717–737. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-09-2021-0681
  5. Alabboodi, A., & Shaban, N. (2019). The Adoption of E-government Services in the Iraqi Higher Education Context : An application of the UTAUT Model in the University of Kufa. Internat Ional Journal of Appl Ied Research.
  6. Alkhwaldi, A. F., Alobidyeen, B., Abdulmuhsin, A. A., & Al-Okaily, M. (2023). Investigating the antecedents of HRIS adoption in public sector organizations: integration of UTAUT and TTF. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 31(7), 3251–3274. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-04-2022-3228
  7. Alshaher, A. (2021). IT capabilities as a fundamental of electronic government system success in developing countries from users perspectives. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 15(1), 129–149. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-05-2020-0080
  8. Althunibat, A., Almaiah, M. A., & Altarawneh, F. (2021). Examining the factors influencing the mobile learning applications usage in higher education during the covid-19 pandemic. Electronics (Switzerland), 10(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10212676
  9. Bojang, M. B. S. (2021). Critical Factors Influencing e-Government Adoption in The Gambia. Society & Sustainability, 3(1), 2021. https://doi.org/10.4018/jitr.2016100103
  10. Chohan, S. R., & Hu, G. (2020). Success Factors Influencing Citizens’ Adoption of IoT Service Orchestration for Public Value Creation in Smart Government. IEEE Access, 8, 208427–208448. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3036054
  11. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  12. Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Janssen, M., Lal, B., Williams, M. D., & Clement, M. (2017). An empirical validation of a unified model of electronic government adoption (UMEGA). Government Information Quarterly, 34(2), 211–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.03.001
  13. Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I., & Hill, R. J. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Contemporary Sociology, 6(2), 244. https://doi.org/10.2307/2065853
  14. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
  15. Isa, S. M., & Wong, K. (2015). Age Differences in Behavioral Intention To Use Internet Marketing : a Comparative Study. International Journal of Business and Society, 16(3), 386–396.
  16. Isaac, W. C. (2007). Performance measurement for the e-Government initiatives: A comparative study - ProQuest. 604, 203. http://e-resources.perpusnas.go.id:2057/docview/304716435/abstract?accountid=25704
  17. Jacob, D. W., & Darmawan, I. (2019). Extending the UTAUT Model to Understand the Citizens’ Acceptance and Use of Electronic Government in Developing Country: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. 2(IcoIESE 2018), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.2991/icoiese-18.2019.17
  18. Juliarti, H., Nugraha, C. D., Sensuse, D. I., Kautsarina, & Suryono, R. R. (2021). Internal Social Media Acceptance in Government Organizations. 2021 International Conference on Computer Science, Information Technology, and Electrical Engineering, ICOMITEE 2021, 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOMITEE53461.2021.9650224
  19. Kangwansil, K., & Leelasantitham, A. (2020). Factors Affecting the Acceptance of Technology Adoption Model in Digital Painting on Tablet of Media Arts Students. 2020 59th Annual Conference of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers of Japan, SICE 2020, 614–619. https://doi.org/10.23919/sice48898.2020.9240418
  20. Karakter Kehidupan Berbangsa Berdasarkan Pancasila, P. (2023). Aparatur Sipil Negara/ASN. 202875.
  21. Kaya, T., Sağsan, M., Medeni, T., Medeni, T., & Yıldız, M. (2020). Qualitative analysis to determine decision-makers’ attitudes towards e-government services in a De-Facto state. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 18(4), 609–629. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-05-2019-0052
  22. Kirat Rai, S., Ramamritham, K., & Jana, A. (2020). Identifying factors affecting the acceptance of government to government system in developing nations – empirical evidence from Nepal. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 14(2), 283–303. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-05-2019-0035
  23. Kumar, R., Sachan, A., & Mukherjee, A. (2023). Adoption of e-government services at different maturity levels: a qualitative study in India. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance , 25(1), 15–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-09-2021-0116
  24. Maulidya Izzati, B. (2020). Analysis of Customer Behaviour in Mobile Food Ordering Application Using UTAUT Model (Case Study: GoFood Application). International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System, 4(1), 23–34. https://ijies.sie.telkomuniversity.ac.id/index.php/IJIES/index
  25. Mustaf, A., Ibrahim, O., & Mohammed, F. (2020). E-government adoption: a systematic review in the context of developing nations. International Journal of Innovation, 8(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v8i1.16479
  26. Mutaqin, K. A., & Sutoyo, E. (2020). Analysis of Citizens Acceptance for e-Government Services in Bandung, Indonesia: The Use of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) Model. Bulletin of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, 1(1), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.25008/bcsee.v1i1.3
  27. Neagara, B. K. (2021). Keputusan Kepala BKN No: 87 Tahun 2021. 10, 6.
  28. Nguyen, P. (2023). Local Government Employees ’ Technology Acceptance of E-Participation : An Empirical Analysis Using Structural Equation Modeling. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997231198847
  29. Nookhao, S., & Kiattisin, S. (2023). Achieving a successful e-government: Determinants of behavioral intention from Thai citizens’ perspective. Heliyon, 9(8), e18944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18944
  30. OECD. (2003). The Case of E-Government: The E-Government Imperative. In OECD Journal on Budgeting (Vol. 3).
  31. Prawati, L. D., Setyawan, M. H., Sari, A. L., & Karina, M. (2022). Implementation of Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) Model for Evaluating the Use of E- Government SIDJP NINE in Indonesia. 2022 4th International Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent System, ICORIS 2022, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORIS56080.2022.10031598
  32. Puspitarini, A., & Retnowardhani, A. (2022). Extended Delone & Mclean Iss Model To Evaluate It Assistance Application Usage Level. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 100(19), 5435–5444.
  33. Puspitasari, D. T., & Kurniawan, T. (2021). Mitigasi Kegagalan Guna Mewujudkan Keberlanjutan E-Government. 4(1).
  34. Rabaa’i, A. A. (2017). The use of UTAUT to investigate the adoption of E-government in Jordan: A cultural perspective. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 24(3), 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIS.2017.10002806
  35. Rakhmawanto, A. (2017). Civil Apparatus. Civil Apparatus Policy Brief, 10, 12–15.
  36. Sabani, A. (2020). Investigating the influence of transparency on the adoption of e-Government in Indonesia. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 12(2), 236–255. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-03-2020-0046
  37. Saputra, M., Maulidya Izzati, B., & Rahmadiani, J. (2021). The Acceptance of Government Resource Planning System Using Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2. Journal of Information System), 17(1), 1–19.
  38. Shahab, S., Bagheri, B., & Potts, R. (2021). Barriers to employing e-participation in the Iranian planning system. Cities, 116(January), 103281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103281
  39. Sivaji, A., Soo, S. T., Rasidi, S. H., Hashim, S. H., Kuppusamy, A. D. N., Abidin, F. Z., Chuan, N. K., Musa, A., Sazali, N., & Deniel, A. (2019). Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology of E-Government Services in Malaysia: Validation of Survey Instrument. 2019 IEEE Conference on Open System, ICOS 2019, December, 6–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOS47562.2019.8975688
  40. Sudirman, I., Aisha, A. N., Monang, J., & Prasetyo, I. R. (2019). Civil servant’s e-government adoption levels: Are age and context matters? International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Informatics (EECSI), 235–240. https://doi.org/10.23919/EECSI48112.2019.8976952
  41. Syamsudin, Meiyanti, R., Satria, D., Wahyuni, R., & Sensuse, D. I. (2018). Exploring factors influence behavioral intention to use E-government services using unified theory of acceptance and use of technology 2 (UTAUT2). 2018 International Seminar on Research of Information Technology and Intelligent Systems, ISRITI 2018, 2, 237–242. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISRITI.2018.8864474
  42. Tussardi, R. R., Izzati, B. M., & Saputra, M. (2021). Analysis of E-Learning Acceptance During Distance Learning Using Unified Theory Of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). JATISI (Jurnal Teknik Informatika Dan Sistem Informasi), 8(2), 465–479. https://doi.org/10.35957/jatisi.v8i2.767
  43. Venkatesh, V. (2022). Adoption and use of AI tools: a research agenda grounded in UTAUT. Annals of Operations Research, 308(1–2), 641–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03918-9
  44. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  45. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Venkatesh_Thong_Xu_MISQ_forthcoming (GENDER AGE EXPERIENCE). MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.
  46. Venkatesh, V., & Zhang, X. (2010). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: U.S. vs. China. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 13(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2010.10856507
  47. Wibowo, W. S., Fadhil, A., Sensuse, D. I., Lusa, S., Putro, P. A. W., & Yulfitri, A. (2023). Pinpointing Factors in the Success of Integrated Information System Toward Open Government Data Initiative: A Perspective from Employees. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 14(1), 94–109. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2023.0140111
  48. Yuliani, S. D., & Widajati, N. (2021). Correlation of Individual Factors and Subjective Workload with Work Stress on Spinning Workers. The Indonesian Journal Of Occupational Safety and Health, 10(1), 117. https://doi.org/10.20473/ijosh.v10i1.2021.117-127
  49. Zainal, N., Hussin, H., Rahim, N., Nazri, M., & Suhaimi, M. A. (2019). Open Government Data Use by Malaysian Researchers. Some empirical evidence. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRIIS48246.2019.9073640
  50. Zeebaree, M., Agoyi, M., & Aqel, M. (2022). Sustainable Adoption of E-Government from the UTAUT Perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095370

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.