To What Extent Political Education Can Influences Young Voters’ Perceptions?
Abstract
This paper sought to examine the influence of the political education program on young voters’ perceptions in responding to a threefold issue: democracy, election, and political parties. By applying a quantitative method, this research employs a regional survey to gather data through a series of intensive training for university students with 17 to 24 in age. There are 37 questions, of which 68 valid respondents shall answer before the training (pre-test) and after the training (post-test). The finding reveals that intensive political education has an authoritative influence in transforming young voters’ perceptions of those issues. It can be proven that most young voters’ perceptions increased from pre-test to post-test. When positive perceptions reached 56.76% in the pre-test, they changed dramatically to 94.59% in the post-test. Conversely, negative perceptions declined from 43.24% in the pre-test to 5.41% in the post-test. This indicates that young voters believe in the fruitfulness and effectiveness of the political education program in constructing the way of thinking and behaving comprehensively toward those three issues. Therefore, this paper not only recommends but also strongly demands that all stakeholders organize such a political education earnestly for young voters to generate future generations who participate in consolidating the democratic fate.
Artikel ini merupakan sebuah usaha mengkaji pengaruh program pendidikan politik terhadap persepsi pemilih pemula dalam merespon tiga isu, yaitu demokrasi, pemilu, dan partai politik. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian kuantitatif, studi ini menggunakan teknik survei yang dilakukan secara regional untuk mengumpulkan data melalui serangkaian pelatihan yang intensif terhadap mahasiswa dengan usia antara 17 dan 24 tahun. Ada 37 pertanyaan di mana 68 responden yang valid harus menjawab sebelum pelatihan (pre-test) dan setelah pelatihan (post-test). Temuan studi ini menunjukkan, bahwa program pendidikan politik yang dilakukan secara intensif memiliki pengaruh yang luar biasa dalam merubah persepsi pemilih pemula terhadap tiga isu tersebut. Ini dibuktikan dengan hasil survei, bahwa mayoritas persepsi responden mengalami peningkatan dari saat pre-test ke post-test. Ketika persepsi positif hanya di prosentase 56,76% saat pre-test, persepsi tersebut meningkat tajam ke prosentase 94,59% saat post-test. Sebaliknya, persepsi negatif turun dari prosentase 43,24% saat pre-test ke prosentase 5,41% saat post-test. Hal ini menunjukkan kenyataan, bahwa pemilih pemula yakin terhadap keberhasilan dan efektivitas program pendidikan politik dalam membentuk cara berfikir dan bertindak yang komprehensif terhadap tiga isu tersebut. Oleh karena itu, artikel ini tidak hanya merekomendasikan tetapi juga meminta secara kuat terhadap sejumlah pihak yang terkait untuk menyelenggarakan program pendidikan politik secara serius terhadap para pemilih pemula agar dapat melahirkan generasi masa depan yang memiliki komitmen untuk mengonsolidasikan nasib demokrasi.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdulbaki, L. (2008). Democratization and Islamic Political Activism in Muslim-Majority Countries: Egypt and Indonesia. PhD Dissertation. Melbourne: University of Melbourne.
Abuza, Z. (2007). Political Islam and Violence in Indonesia. London: Routledge.
Al-Hamdi, R., Sakir, Atmojo, M. E., Suswanta, & Efendi., D. (2021). Penelitian Kualitatif: Pegangan Mahasiswa Ilmu Pemerintahan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Al-Hamdi, R., & Sofyan, N. (2022). Pelajar Bertanya, Pemilu Menjawab: Urgensi Pendidikan Pemilih Pemula. Yogyakarta: Samudra Biru & PUSDEPPOL.
Al-Hamdi, R., Suranto, Widodo, B. C. E., Sulaksono, T., & Darumurti, A. (2014). The perception of young voters towards the integrity of the 2014 election: A survey in special region of Yogyakarta. Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan, 5(1): 104-113.
Aribowo, E. K. (2019). Analisis Bibliometrik Berkala Ilmiah Names: Journal of Onomastics dan Peluang Riset Onomastik di Indonesia. Aksara, 31(1), 91-111. https://doi.org/10.29255/aksara.v31i1.373.91-111
Aspinall, E. (2010). Indonesia in 2009: Democratic triumphs and trials. Southeast Asian Affairs, 2010: 103-125.
Aspinall, E. (2013). How Indonesia survived: Comparative perspectives on state disintegration and democratic integration. In Künkler, M., & Stepan, A. (Eds.), Democracy and Islam in Indonesia. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 126-146.
Badan Pusat Statistik RI. (2021). Hasil Sensus Penduduk 2020. Retrivied on 18 July 2022 from bps.go.id website: https://www.bps.go.id/pressrelease/2021/01/21/1854/hasil-sensus-penduduk-2020.html
Berg, B. L., & Lune, H. (2012). Qualitative Research Methods for Social Sciences. Boston & New York: Pearson Education.
Bünte, M., & Ufen, A. (2009). The New Order and its legacy reflections on democratization in Indonesia. In Bünte, M., & Ufen, A. (Eds.), Democratization in Post-Suharto Indonesia. London: Routledge, pp. 3-29.
Clark, C. H. (2016). Examining the relationship between civic education and partisan alignment in young voters. Theory & Research in Social Education, 45(2): 218-247, DOI: 10.1080/00933104.2016.1250690
Codrington, G. T., & Grant-Marshall, S. (2004). Mind the Gap. Rosebank: Penguin Books.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In Denzin, N. K., and
Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, pp. 1-19.
Diamond, L. (2010). Indonesia’s place in global democracy. In Aspinall, E., & Mietzner, M. (Eds.) Problems of Democratisation in Indonesia: Elections, Institutions and Society. Singapore: ISEAS, pp. 21-49.
Endres, K., & Kelly, K. J. (2017): Does microtargeting matter? Campaign contact strategies and young voters. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 28(1), 1-18. DOI: 10.1080/17457289.2017.1378222
Feith, H. (1962). The Decline of Constitutional Democracy in Indonesia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Freedom House. (Various years). Freedom in the World. Available from: https://freedomhouse.org/reports
Halimatusa’diyah, I., & Prihatini, E. (2021). Young voters and political participation in Indonesia: Revisiting a marriage gap. Social Science Quarterly, 2021: 1–13
Hefner, R. W. (2000). Civil Islam: Muslims and Democratization in Indonesia. Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Hefner, R. W. (2009a). Introduction: Modernity and the remaking of Muslim politics. In Hefner, R. W. (Ed.), Remaking Muslim Politics: Pluralism, Contestation, Democratization. Oxford: Princeton University Press, pp. 1-36.
Hefner, R. W. (2009b). Muslim democrats and Islamist violence in post-Soeharto Indonesia. In Hefner, R. W. (Ed.), Remaking Muslim Politics: Pluralism, Contestation, Democratization. Oxford: Princeton University Press, pp. 273-301.
Law No. 7 Year 2017 on General Election.
Levine, K. J., Clark, N., Haygood, D. M., & Muenchen, R. A. (2011). Change: How young voters interpreted the messages sent during the 2008 presidential election season. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(4): 479-501. DOI: 10.1177/0002764211398075
Liddle, R. W. (2013). Improving the quality of democracy in Indonesia: Toward a theory of action. Indonesia, Special Issue: Wealth, Power, and Contemporary Indonesian Politics (October), 96: 59-80.
Liddle, R. W., & Mujani, S. (2013). Indonesian democracy: From transition to consolidation. In Künkler, M., & Stepan, A. (Eds.) Democracy and Islam in Indonesia. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 24-50.
Lin, Y., & Lim, S. (2009). Relationships of media use to political cynicism and efficacy: A preliminary study of young South Korean voters. Asian Journal of Communication, 12(1), 25-39. DOI: 10.1080/01292980209364812
Magnis-Suseno, F. (2013). Indonesia’s challenge: Making democracy succeeded. In Heise, M., & Rucktäschel, K. (Eds.), Indonesia’s Search for Democracy: Political, Economic, and Social Developments. Baden-Baden: Nomos-Verlag, pp. 23-36.
Manik, H. K., & Budhiati, I. (2015). Pedoman Pendidikan Pemilih. Jakarta: Komisi Pemilihan Umum Republik Indonesia.
Marmilova, E., Kashirskaya, L., Karabasheva, M., & Kudryashova, E. (2021). Potential of voter turnout among young people in the case of application of e-voting, postal voting, and three-day voting. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 12(4): 47-63.
Merkel, W. (2007). Embedded and defective democracies. In Hadiwinata B. S., & Schuck, C. (Eds.), Democracy in Indonesia: The Challenge of Consolidation. Baden-Baden: Nomos-Verlag, pp. 31-63.
Mietzner, M. (2009). Indonesia and the pitfalls of low-quality democracy: A case study of the gubernatorial elections in North Sulawesi. In Bünte, M., & Ufen, A. (Eds.), Democratization in Post-Suharto Indonesia. London: Routledge, pp. 124-149.
Mietzner, M. (2013). Money, Power and Ideology: Political Parties in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia. Copenhagen: NUS Press and NIAS Press.
Mietzner, M. (2014a). How Jokowi won and democracy survived. Journal of Democracy, 25(4): 111-125.
Mietzner, M. (2014b). Successful and failed democratic transitions from military rule in majority Muslim societies: The cases of Indonesia and Egypt. Contemporary Politics, 20(4): 435-452.
Mujani, S. (2003). Religious Democrats: Democratic Culture and Muslim Political Participation in Post-Suharto Indonesia. PhD Dissertation. Columbus: Ohio State University.
Mujani, S., & Liddle, R. W. (2009). Muslim Indonesia’s secular democracy. Asian Survey, 49(4): 575–590.
Noordin, N., Sawal, M. Z. H. M., Ibrahim, S., Hussin, Z. H., Zakaria, Z., & Nordin, J. (2010). Malaysian young voters voices: Make or break political development? 2010 International Conference on Science and Social Research (CSSR), December 5-7: 426-430.
Prihatini, E. S. (2018). Indonesian young voters: Political knowledge and electing women into parliament. Women’s Studies International Forum, 70: 46-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.wsif.2018.07.015
Ramage, D. E. (2007). Indonesia: Democracy first, good governance later. Southeast Asian Affairs, 2007(1): 135-157.
Rekker, R. (2022). Young trendsetters: How young voters fuel electoral volatility. Electoral Studies, 75: 102425.
Schmuck, D., & Matthes, J. (2015). How anti-immigrant right-wing populist advertisements affect young voters: Symbolic threats, economic threats and the moderating role of education. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41(10), 1577-1599, DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2014.981513
Schuck, C. (2007). The breakdown of autocratic rule: Selected aspects of transition-theories as reflected in Indonesia’s democratization-process. In Hadiwinata, B. S., & Schuck, C. (Eds.), Democracy in Indonesia: The Challenge of Consolidation. Baden-Baden: Nomos-Verlag, pp. 151-174.
Sevi, S. (2021). Do young voters vote for young leaders? Electoral Studies, 69: 102200. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102200
Siegel-Stechler, K. (2018). Is civics enough? High school civics education and young adult voter turnout. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 43(3): 241-253.
Sola-Morales, S., & Hernández-Santaolalla, V. (2017). Voter turnout and new forms of political participation of young people: A comparative analysis between Chile and Spain. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 72: 629-648. DOI:10.4185/RLCS-2017-1183
Susila, I. Dean, D., Yusof, R. N. R., Setyawan, A. A., & Wajdi, F. (2019). Symbolic political communication, and trust: A young voters’ perspective of the Indonesian presidential election. Journal of Political Marketing, 19(1-2): 153-175. DOI: 10.1080/15377857.2019.1652224
Tan, P. J. (2012). Reining in the reign of the parties: Political parties in contemporary Indonesia. Asian Journal of Political Science, 20(2): 154-179.
Tariq, R., Zolkepli, I. A., & Ahmad, M. (2022). Political participation of young voters: Tracing direct and indirect effects of social media and political orientations. Social Sciences, 11(2): 81-101. https://doi.org/10.3390/ socsci11020081
The Economist Intelligence Unit. (Various years). Democracy Index. Available from: http://www.eiu.com
Ufen, A. (2009). Political parties and democratization in Indonesia. In Bünte, M., & Ufen, A. (Eds.), Democratization in post-Suharto Indonesia. London: Routledge, pp. 153-175.
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2020). VOSviewer Manual version 1.6.16. Univeristeit Leiden, (November), 1–52. Retrieved from https://www.vosviewer.com/download/f-33t2.pdf
Winters, J. A. (2013). Oligarchy and democracy in Indonesia. Indonesia. 96, Special Issue: Wealth, Power, and Contemporary Indonesian Politics (October): 11-33.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/jgcs.v7i1.7259
Article Metrics
Abstract - 801 PDF - 647Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Government and Civil Society
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Journal of Government and Civil Society is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License .