META-ANALYSIS: THE INFLUENCE OF CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING APPROACHES ON MATHEMATICAL PROBLEM-SOLVING ABILITIES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31000/prima.v10i1.15172

Keywords:

contextual teaching and learning, mathematical problem-solving, meta-analysis, instructional effectiveness, mathematics education

Abstract

Students' ability to solve mathematical problems remains a crucial issue in Indonesian education, often caused by a lack of contextual interaction and teacher-centered learning. This study aims to analyze the impact of the Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) approach on students' mathematical problem-solving abilities through a meta-analysis method. A total of 23 primary studies that met the inclusion criteria were analyzed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software version 4.0 with a random-effects model. The results show that the CTL approach has a strong and significant effect on students' mathematical problem-solving skills, with an overall effect size (Hedges’ g) of 0.819. Moderator analysis indicates that education level, region, and sample size do not significantly influence mathematical problem-solving ability through the CTL model. These findings affirm that the CTL approach is an effective instructional strategy for enhancing students' mathematical problemsolving abilities by connecting abstract concepts to real-world contexts. The educational implications of this study suggest that teachers and policymakers should consistently promote the implementation of CTL to foster more meaningful and contextual mathematics learning.

References

August, F. M., & Ramlah, R. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Berdasarkan Prosedur Polya. Jipmat: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 43–59. Https://Core.Ac.Uk/Download/Pdf/429520312.Pdf

Bahri, H. S., & Zamzam, H. F. (2021). Model Penelitian Kuantitatif Berbasis Sem-Amos. Deepublish.Yogyakarta.Https://Books.Google.Com/Books?Hl=Id&Lr=&Id=Wahreqaaqbaj

Bintang, N. A. (2020). Comparison Of Mathematical Problem Solving Abilities Between High School Students Whose Learning Uses The Contextual Teaching And Learning (Ctl) Approach And The Discovery Approach. Journal Of Innovative Mathematics Learning (Jiml), 3(1), 57-60. Http://Journal.Ikipsiliwangi.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Jiml/Article/View/4098

Baqi, M., Tayeb, T., Nur, F., Majid, A. F., & Mattoliang, L. A. (2023). Meta-Analisis: Pengaruh Media Pembelajaran Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Peserta Didik. Al Asma: Journal Of Islamic Education, 5(2), 143–152. Https://Arsip-Journal.Uin-Alauddin.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Alasma/Article/View/41967

Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2021). Introduction to meta-analysis. John wiley & sons. Hoboken, USA. https://www2.internationalinsurance.org/GR-8-11/files?dataid=NWY75-5617&title=introduction-to-meta-analysis-michael-borenstein.pdf

Coe, R. (2002, September). It’s the effect size, stupid. In British educational research association annual conference (Vol. 12, p. 14). https://f.hubspotusercontent30.net/hubfs/5191137/attachments/ebe/ESguide.pdf

Erlina, A. P. N., Widodo, S., & Handayani, A. D. (2021). Meta-Analisis: Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Melalui Implementasi Pembelajaran Kontekstual. Vygotsky: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Matematika, 3(2), 45–57. Https://Jurnalpendidikan.Unisla.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Voj

Glass, G. V. (2015). Meta-analysis at middle age: A personal history. Research Synthesis Methods, 6(3), 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1133

Haidich, A. B. (2010). Meta-analysis in medical research. Hippokratia, 14(Suppl 1), 29. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3049418/

Harefa, M., Surya, E., & Amry, Z. (2022). Perbedaan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Dan Self-Efficacy Siswa Antara Model Pembelajaran Contextual Teaching And Learning Dengan Problem Based Learning. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(3), 2801-2815. Https://Doi.Org/10.31004/Cendekia.V6i3.1773

Irawan, H., Ikhsan, M., Rahman, Y., & Andri, M. (2024). Meta-Analisis Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Siswa. Journal Of Development Education And Learning (Jodel), 2(1), 145–151. Https://Doi.Org/10.31004/Jodel.V1i2.25

Johnson, E. B. (2002). Contextual teaching and learning: What it is and why it's here to stay. CorwinPress. https://books.google.com/books/about/Contextual_Teaching_and_Learning.html?id=2HRoigMMdqMC

Khoirunnisa, F. D., Junaedi, I., Kharisudin, I., Mariani, S., & Agoestanto, A. (2024). Meta-Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Pada Implementasi Contextual Teaching And Learning (Ctl). Jpmi (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 7(2), 309-322. Https://Doi.Org/10.22460/Jpmi.V7i2.21652

Kistian, A., & Fahreza, F. (2020). Perbedaan Model Pembelajaran Contextual Teaching And Learning (Ctl) Dan Ekspositori Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Di Kelas Iv Sdn Peunaga Cut Ujong. Jurnal Tunas Bangsa, 7(1), 50–59. Https://Doi.Org/10.46244/Tunasbangsa.V7i1.975

Latifah, T., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2021). Kesulitan Dalam Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Pada Materi Statistika. Journal Of Authentic Research On Mathematics Education (Jarme), 3(2), 134–150. Https://Doi.Org/10.37058/Jarme.V3i2.3207

Maya, R., & Ruqoyyah, S. (2021). Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving Ability And Disposition Using Contextual Teaching And Learning Approach. Journal Of Innovative Mathematics Learning (Jiml), 4(1), 12-21. Https://Doi.Org/10.22460/Jiml.V4i1.P12-21

Mullen, B., Muellerleile, P., & Bryant, B. (2001). Cumulative meta-analysis: A consideration of indicators of sufficiency and stability. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(11), 1450-1462.

Nur, M. A. (2024). Meta-Analisis Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Contextual Teaching And Learning (Ctl) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Kognitif: Jurnal Riset Hots Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 151–161. Https://Doi.Org/10.51574/Kognitif.V4i1.1409

Oecd. (2023). Pisa 2022 Results (Volume I). Oecd Publishing. Https://Doi.Org/10.1787/53f23881-En

Paloloang, M. F. B., Juandi, D., Tamur, M., Paloloang, B., & Adem, A. M. (2020). Meta analisis: pengaruh problem-based learning terhadap kemampuan literasi matematis siswa di Indonesia tujuh tahun terakhir. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 9(4),851-864. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v9i4.3049

Parhusip, Y. P., & Hardini, A. T. A. (2020). Meta-Analisis Efektivitas Pembelajaran Kontekstual Terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Matematika Bagi Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Mimbar Ilmu, 25(3), 1–12. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/MI/article/view/27954

Permatasari, I., & Marlina, R. (2023). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis. Didactical Mathematics, 5(2), 295–304. Https://Doi.Org/10.31949/Dm.V5i2.5528

Pugu, M. R., Riyanto, S., & Haryadi, R. N. (2024). Metodologi Penelitian; Konsep, Strategi, dan Aplikasi. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia. https://books.google.co.jp/books/about/Metodologi_Penelitian_Konsep_Strategi_da.html?id=kPYkEQAAQBAJ

Putra, P. B. S., & Rahayu, T. S. (2021). Meta-Analisis Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Numbered Head Together Dan Jigsaw Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika Kelas V. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 7(4), 495–505. Https://Doi.Org/10.5281/Zenodo.5178880

Rahmaniar, E., Maemonah, M., & Mahmudah, I. (2022). Kritik Terhadap Teori Perkembangan Kognitif Piaget Pada Tahap Anak Usia Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(1),1-12. Https://Www.Academia.Edu/Download/87623457/1952-7862-1-Pb.Pdf

Rahmawati, L., Friansah, D., & Yanto, Y. (2025). Kajian Sistematis Penggunaan Model Ctl Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fakultas Sains Dan Teknologi, Universitas Pgri Silampari. Https://Ojs.Unpari.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Sclost/Article/Download/325/92

Risdiana, V. D. (2023). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMP. Skripsi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar.

Setyaningrum, D. U., & Mampouw, H. L. (2020). Proses Metakognisi Siswa Smp Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Perbandingan Senilai Dan Berbalik Nilai. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2), 275-286. Http://Journal.Institutpendidikan.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Mosharafa

Siregar, K.I.S., Yusnaldi, E., Widiya Putri, C., Almeida, A., Idma Siregar, N., Farida Zuhra, C., & Sumatera Utara, U. (N.D.). Pengaruh Kondisi Geografis Indonesia Terhadap Interaksi Belajar Mengajar Di Sd/Mi. https://jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/download/24862/16933/42192

Sulystiani, F., Syamsuddin, A., & Mukhlis, M. (2024). Perbandingan penerapan CTL dan RME ditinjau dari kemampuan pemecahan masalah. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 9(3),235-242. https://journal.unpas.ac.id/index.php/pendas/article/view/13100

Sutisna, E., Syamsuri, S., Hendrayana, A., & Mutaqin, A. (2023). Meta-Analysis: Pengaruh Model Problem Based Learning Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(3), 3148–3161. Https://Doi.Org/10.31004/Cendekia.V7i3.1453

Downloads

Published

2025-12-10