DEVELOPMENT OF A TEST INSTRUMENT CONTAINING STEM COMPONENTS TO MEASURE ANALYTICAL THINKING SKILL IN TRIGONOMETRIC RATIOS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31000/prima.v10i1.15302Keywords:
test instruments, analytical thinking skills, STEMAbstract
This study focuses on creating assessment tools to evaluate how well students can think analytically about math when dealing with trigonometric comparisons, assessing how accurate, consistent, and challenging each question is. Thirty-one students in the eleventh grade at SMAN 1 Rawamerta took part in this research. The 4D model was the method utilized for development, but it was streamlined to a 3D process (define, design, and develop). The assessment tool that was developed comprised four open-ended questions. Three college instructors and a seasoned teacher, acting as expert evaluators, examined the content, appearance, and structure of the test to ensure it was valid. Following the declaration of validity for the test tool, a small-scale trial was carried out to ascertain its real-world validity, dependability, and degree of difficulty. The expert validation results showed that this tool is highly valid, achieving a validity score of 97.92%. According to the calculations for real-world validity, this test instrument meets the criteria for good validity. The reliability test findings indicate good criteria with a calculated r value of 0.7363. Regarding difficulty, one question was classified as easy, while three questions were deemed to be of medium difficulty. Consequently, the assessment tool created can be considered suitable for use as a test containing STEM elements for gathering research data to gauge students' mathematical analytical thinking abilities. Furthermore, it is anticipated that educators can utilize this assessment tool as an evaluation material to thoroughly assess students' thinking capabilities at different stages.References
Abidin, Z., & Tohir, M. (2019). Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi dalam Memecahkan Deret Aritmatika Dua Dimensi Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom. Alifmatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 1(1), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.35316/alifmatika.2019.v1i1.44-60
Agustiani, N., Setiani, A., & Lukman, H. S. (2022). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes PLSV Berdasarkan Indikator Berpikir Kritis dan Pemecahan Masalah. Jambura Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(2), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.34312/jmathedu.v3i2.15837
Ahmad, S., Prahmana, R. C. I., Kenedi, A. K., Helsa, Y., Arianil, Y., & Zainil, M. (2017). The Instruments of Higher Order Thinking Skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 943(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/943/1/012053
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2010). Kerangka Landasaran untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, dan Asesmen (1st ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.
Areesophonpichet, S. (2013). A Development of Analytical Thinking Skills of Graduate Students by Using Concept Mapping. The Asian Conference on Education 2013. www.iafor.org
Jeprianto, Ubaduddin, & Herwani. (2021). Penilaian Pengetahuan Penugasan Dalam Pembelajaran di Sekolah. Munaddhomah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 2(1), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.31538/munaddhomah.v2i1.55
Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. In International Journal of STEM Education (Vol. 3, Issue 1). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. In Theory into Practice (Vol. 41, Issue 4, pp. 212–218). Ohio State University Press. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
Lestari, K. E., & Yudhanegara, M. R. (2015). Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika (1st ed., Vol. 1). PT Refeika Aditama.
Maydiantoro, A. (2021). Model-Model Penelitian Pengembangan. JPPPI, 29–35.
Ndiung, S., & Jediut, M. (2020). Pengembangan instrumen tes hasil belajar matematika peserta didik sekolah dasar berorientasi pada berpikir tingkat tinggi. Premiere Educandum: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Pembelajaran, 10(1), 94–111. https://doi.org/10.25273/pe.v10i1.6274
Permana, T. I., Hindun, I., Rofi’ah, N. L., & Azizah, A. S. N. (2019). Critical thinking skills: The academic ability, mastering concepts, and analytical skill of undergraduate students. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 5(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i1.7626
Prawita, W., Prayitno, B. A., & Sugiyarto. (2019). Effectiveness of a Generative Learning-Based Biology Module to Improve the Analytical Thinking Skills of the Students with High and Low Reading Motivation. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 1459–1476. www.e-iji.net
Ramli, M. (2015). Hakikat Pendidik dan Peserta Didik. Tarbiyah Islamiyah, 5(1). https://h7.cl/1e-Hm
Riduwan. (2015). Skala Pengukuran Variabel-Variabel Penelitian. Alfabeta.
Sa’diyyah, F. N., Mania, S., & Suharti. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Berpikir Komputasi Siswa. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v4i1.17-26
Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM Education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 20–27. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
Saputra, R. A., Herpratiwi, H., & Caswita, C. (2020). Developing a STEM-based students’ worksheet building material in elementary school Bandar Lampung City. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 8(2), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v8i2.33478
Thaneerananon, T., Triampo, W., & Nokkaew, A. (2016). Development of a test to evaluate students’ analytical thinking based on fact versus opinion differentiation. International Journal of Instruction, 9(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2016.929a
Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D., & Semmel, M. I. (1974). Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Children: A Sourcebook. University of Indiana.
Torlakson. (2014). INNOVATE: A Blueprint for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics in California Public Education. The Californians Dedicated to Education Foundation. http://www.cde.ca.gov/pd/ca/sc/documents/innovate.pdf.
Wahyuni, T. S., & Analita, R. N. (2017). Guided-inquiry laboratory experiments to improve students’ analytical thinking skills. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1911. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5016010
Wang, M., Mohd Matore, M. E. E., & Rosli, R. (2025). A systematic literature review on analytical thinking development in mathematics education: trends across time and countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1523836
Wijayanti, T. F., Auliandari, L., Fadillah, E. N., & Dewiyeti, S. (2022). Profil Berpikir Analitis Mahasiswa Tingkat Awal Prodi Pendidikan Biologi Universitas Swasta di Palembang. Didaktika Biologi: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Biologi, 6(2), 99–104. http://jurnal.um-palembang.ac.id/index.php/dikbio
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
