The Phenomenon of Ambivalence in Policy Implementation: How Muhammadiyah Universities Protect Women against Sexual Violence

Ria Angin; Fauziah Fauziah; Kahar Haerah

doi:10.31000/jgcs.v8i1.10056

The Phenomenon of Ambivalence in Policy Implementation: How Muhammadiyah Universities Protect Women against Sexual Violence

Ria Angin, Fauziah Fauziah, Kahar Haerah

Abstract

This article discusses "The phenomenon of ambivalence in policy implementation: How Muhammadiyah / Aisyiyah Universities protect women from sexual violence". This phenomenon began when the Ministry refused to change the statement by the Council for Higher Education, Research and Development regarding the revision of article 5 (paragraph 2). ).Due to the Minister's rejection, the Rectors of Muhammadiyah/Aisyiyah as street level bureaucracy, only adopted clauses in the articles of the ministerial regulations that were in line with Islamic values and principles, and integrated them with interpretive clauses related to Article 5 (paragraph 2). ) becomes a new policy. This research uses qualitative research. The informant were the Rectors of Muhamamdiyah/Aisyiyah Universities in the Eastern part of East Java. Qualitative descriptive techniques are used to analyze the data. Each Muhamamdiyah/Aisyiyah University is currently implementing this new policy internally. Presumably because it is enforced internally, the Ministry has not banned this practice. These findings highlight the flexibility of implementing policies to protect women against sexual violence, allowing for changes in line with the internal norms and principles of street-level bureaucracy.

Artikel ini membahas tentang “Fenomena ambivalensi dalam implementasi kebijakan: Bagaimana Perguruan Tinggi Muhammadiyah /Aisyiyah melindungi perempuan dari kekerasan seksual”. Fenomena ini bermula ketika Kementerian menolak mengubah pernyataan Majelis Pendidikan Tinggi, Penelitian dan Pengembangan terkait revisi pasal 5 (ayat 2). Atas penolakan Menteri tersebut, maka para Rektor Muhammadiyah/Aisyiyah sebagai street level birokrasi, hanya mengadopsi klausul dalam pasal-pasal peraturan menteri yang sejalan dengan nilai-nilai dan prinsip-prinsip Islam, serta mengintegrasikan dengan klausul penafsiran terkait dengan Pasal 5 (ayat 2). ) menjadi kebijakan baru. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif.Informannya adalah Rektor Universitas Muhamamdiyah/Aisyiyah di Jawa Timur bagian Timur.Teknik deskriptif kualitatif digunakan untuk menganalisis data. Masing-masing Universitas Muhamamdiyah/Aisyiyah saat ini sedang melaksanakan kebijakan baru secara internal. Agaknya karena diberlakukan internal, Kementerian belum melarang praktik ini. Temuan- temuan ini menyoroti fleksibilitas penerapan kebijakan perlindungan perempuan terhadap kekerasan seksual, yang memungkinkan perubahan sejalan dengan norma dan prinsip internal birokrasi tingkat jalanan.

Keywords

policy, Muhammadiyah, protection, violence, sexual

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adiputra, S., Awanisa, A., & Purba, Y. H. (2022). The Urgency of the Law on Sexual Violence Criminal Act in Combating Sexual Violence in Indonesia. Ius Poenale, 3(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.25041/ip.v3i1.2521

Afandi. (2021). Muhammadiyah Komitmen Lawan Kekerasan Seksual, Penolakan Permendikbud 30 Murni Karena Substansi. Muhammadiyah Cahaya Islam Berkemajuan. https://muhammadiyah.or.id/muhammadiyah-komitmen-lawan- kekerasan-seksual-penolakan-permendikbud-30-murni-karena-substansi/

Barnett, M. L., Henriques, I., & Husted, B. W. (2020). The Rise and Stall of Stakeholder Influence: How the Digital Age Limits Social Control. Academy of Management Perspectives, 34(1), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2017.0080

Banyard, V. L. (2020). Academic Correlates of Unwanted Sexual Contact, Intercourse, Stalking, and Intimate Partner Violence: An Understudied but Important Consequence for College Students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(21), 4375– 4392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517715022

Bonar, E. E., DeGue, S., Abbey, A., Coker, A. L., Lindquist, C. H., McCauley, H. L., ... & Walton, M. A. (2022). Prevention of sexual violence among college students: Current challenges and future directions. Journal of American College Health, 70(2), 575-588. Burn, S. M. (2019). The Psychology of Sexual Harassment. Teaching of Psychology, 46(1), 96–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628318816183

Endang Pasaribu. (2022). Reflection on Permendikbudristek No.30 of 2021 About Prevention and Treatment and Sexual Violence. Baltic Journal of Law & Politics , 15(7), 362–374.

Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press.

García-Moreno, C. , P. C. , D. K. , S. H. , W. C. A. N. , & W. H. O. (2013). Global and regional estimates of violence against women: Prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. World Health Organization.

Gardner, J. R. , R. R. and S. H. W. A. (1986). Handbook of Strategic Planning. http://www.12manage.com/methods_stakeholder_mapping. html

Grindle, Marilee. S. (1980). Politics and Policy Implementation in The Third World, Princnton University Press, New Jersey.

Habibie, T. A., & Uyun, Q. (2023). Model Intervensi Islam Dalam Penanganan Gejala Gangguan Stress Pasca Trauma pada Orang Tua yang Memiliki Anak Sebagai Korban Kekerasan Seksual. Journal of Islamic and Contemporary Psychology (JICOP), 3(1s), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.25299/jicop.v3i1s.12363

Huda, S., & Kusumawati, D. (2019). Muhammadiyah Sebagai Gerakan Pendidikan. TARLIM : JURNAL PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM, 2(2), 163. https://doi.org/10.32528/tarlim.v2i2.2607

Irfawandi, I., Hirwan, I., Aziz, Z. M., Syukur, M., & Arifin, I. (2023). Analisis Jenis Jenis Dan Penyebab Kekerasan Seksual Di Lingkungan Kampus. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 4(04), 383–392. https://doi.org/10.59141/japendi.v4i04.1747

Kemendikbud. (2021, December 11). Wujudkan Lingkungan Perguruan Tinggi yang Aman dari Kekerasan Seksua. Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan.

Lipsky, Michael. 2010. Street-level bureaucrats: The dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

Mocham, P. H. I. F. dan. (2020). MODEL GERAKAN DAKWA KEAGAMAAN MUHAMMADIYAH: Studi Etnografi di Kabupaten Sidoarjo Jawa Timur. Jurnal Sosiologi Reflektif, 15(1), 103. https://doi.org/10.14421/jsr.v15i1.1967

Moh Faizin, et al. (2022). The Role Of Muhammadiyah In The Policy For The Protection Of Sexual Violence. Audito Comparative Law Journal, ACLJ, 3(3).

Nikmatullah. (2020). Demi Nama Baik Kampus VS Perlindungan Korban: Kasus Kekerasan Seksual Di Kampus. Qowwam: Journal for Gender and Mainstreaming , 14(2), 37–53.

Oram, S., Khalifeh, H., & Howard, L. M. (2017). Violence against women and mental health. The Lancet Psychiatry, 4(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215- 0366(16)30261-9

Oslami, A. F. (2021). Analisis Permendikbudristek Nomor 30 Tahun 2021 Dalam Upaya Pencegahan Kekerasan Seksual . AL-AHKAM: Jurnal Syari’ah Dan Peradilan Islam, 1(2), 101–118.

Pangestu, B. R., Basri, B., Krisnan, J., & Kurniaty, Y. (2022). Efektivitas Permendikbudristek Nomor 30 Tahun 2021 Untuk Mereduksi Kekerasan Seksual di Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang. Borobudur Law and Society Journal, 1(2), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.31603/7400

Purwanti, A., & Zalianti, M. (2018). STRATEGI PENYELESAIAN TINDAK KEKERASAN SEKSUAL TERHADAP PEREMPUAN DAN ANAK MELALUI RUU KEKERASAN SEKSUAL. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 47(2), 138. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.47.2.2018.138-148

Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., Prell, C., Quinn, C. H., & Stringer, L. C. (2009). Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1933–1949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001

Ripley, R. B. and G. A. F. (1986). Policy Implementation and Beureucracy (Second Edition). The Dorsey Press.

Rizkia Rahmasari. (2022). Analisa Makna ‘Persetujuan’ dalam Pemendikbud Ristek

No. 30 Tahun 2021 terhadap Fenomena Kekerasan Seksual di Lingkungan Pendidikan

yang Dianggap sebagai Upaya Legitimasi Terhadap Perzinaan. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan, 3(1), 78–89.

S. Benna, R. A. and B. O. (2016). Defining and identifying stakeholders: Views from management and stakeholders. S.Afr.J.Bus.Manage, 47(2), 1–4.

Seidel, J. V. (1998). Qualitative Data Analysis . Seidel Qualis Research. www.qualisresearch.com

The Lancet. (2015). Violence against women and girls: how far have we come? The Lancet, 386(10008), 2029. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01029-6

Thompson, R. (2011). Stakeholder Analysis. Mindtools. https://www.mindtools.com/aol0rms/stakeholder-analysis

WHO. (2021, March 9). Devastatingly pervasive: 1 in 3 women globally experience violence. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/news/item/09-03- 2021-devastatingly-pervasive-1-in-3-women-globally-experience-violence

Wijana, E. P. E. (2020). Sederet Kasus Kekerasan Seksual di Kampus Yogyakarta, Bukan Cuma UII. Jogja Suara.

Yokhebed Arumdika Probosambodo, W. (2022). The Implementation of Permendikbudristek Number 30 of 2021 Concerning Prevention and Handling of Sexual Violence in Higher Education at Universitas Slamet Riyadi Surakarta. Journal of Indonesian Culture and Beliefs (JICB) , 1(2), 91–100.

Yoshihama M, H. J. K. S. (2009). The role of emotional abuse in intimate partner violence and health among women in Yokohama, Japan. Am J Public Health. . Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t. , 99(4), 647.

Yuni Kartika, A. N. (2020). Kebijakan Hukum Perbuatan Pelecehan Seksual (Catcalling) dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana. PAMPAS: Journal Of Criminal, 1(2), 1– 21.

Zulkifli, et al. (2022). Social construction of Law enforcement for sexual violence against women in Aceh Utara. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan , 19(2), 224–234.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/jgcs.v8i1.10056