Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): Journal of Government and Civil Society (October)

Improving Quality of Land Data Towards Modern Land Administration in The Administrative City of West Jakarta

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31000/jgcs.v8i2.11104
Submitted
20 March 2024
Published
6 November 2024

Abstract

Land data quality plays a pivotal role in advancing modern land administration, impacting both national economic growth and Indonesia’s competitive position in the global property index, where it currently ranks 106th in Ease of Doing Business. This research focuses on the need for systematic quality improvements in both physical (spatial) and juridical (textual) land data within the West Jakarta City Administration to address existing data deficiencies. Applying the Driver-Pressures-States-Impacts-Responses (DPSIR) framework, this study investigates key challenges, causal factors, and strategic interventions aimed at enhancing land data quality. In-depth interviews with stakeholders were conducted to elucidate these dynamics and inform the proposed strategies. The findings highlight the successful digitization and validation of 94.52% of 423,189 Land Book records, 69.03% of 494,071 Ownership Rights Plans/Measurement Letters, and the spatial data of 94.68% across 427,569 land parcels, thereby improving the Data Quality Classification (KW) across categories 4–6. This study underscores the critical importance of robust data validation processes in modernizing Indonesia’s Land Administration System (LAS), offering valuable insights for enhancing the efficiency, transparency, and reliability of land data, thereby supporting economic development and improving Indonesia’s standing in the global property market.


Kualitas data pertanahan memainkan peran penting dalam memajukan administrasi pertanahan modern, yang berdampak pada pertumbuhan ekonomi nasional dan posisi kompetitif Indonesia dalam indeks properti global, di mana saat ini menduduki peringkat ke-106 dalam kemudahan berbisnis. Penelitian ini berfokus pada kebutuhan peningkatan kualitas data secara sistematis, baik fisik (spasial) maupun yuridis (tekstual), di Administrasi Kota Jakarta Barat untuk mengatasi kekurangan data yang ada. Dengan menerapkan kerangka Driver-Pressures-States-Impacts-Responses (DPSIR), studi ini menginvestigasi tantangan utama, faktor penyebab, dan intervensi strategis untuk meningkatkan kualitas data pertanahan. Wawancara mendalam dengan pemangku kepentingan dilakukan untuk menguraikan dinamika ini dan mendukung strategi yang diusulkan. Temuan menunjukkan keberhasilan digitalisasi dan validasi 94,52% dari 423.189 dokumen Buku Tanah, 69,03% dari 494.071 dokumen Rencana Hak Milik/Surat Ukur, serta data spasial dari 94,68% di 427.569 bidang tanah, sehingga meningkatkan Klasifikasi Kualitas Data (KW) di kategori 4–6. Penelitian ini menekankan pentingnya proses validasi data yang kuat dalam memodernisasi Sistem Administrasi Pertanahan (LAS) Indonesia, menawarkan wawasan berharga untuk meningkatkan efisiensi, transparansi, dan keandalan data pertanahan yang mendukung pembangunan ekonomi dan memperbaiki posisi Indonesia di pasar properti global.

References

  1. Aditya, T., Santosa, P. B., Yulaikhah, Y., Widjajanti, N., Atunggal, D., & Sulistyawati, M. (2021). Title Validation and collaborative mapping to accelerate quality assurance of land registration. Land Use Policy, 109, 105689. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2021.105689
  2. Aditya, T., Sucaya, I. K. G. A., & Nugroho Adi, F. (2021). LADM-compliant field data collector for cadastral surveyors. Land Use Policy, 104, 105356. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2021.105356
  3. Ahmed, S., Mushtaq, M., Fahlevi, M., Aljuaid, M., & Saniuk, S. (2023). Decomposed and composed effects of economic freedom on economic growth in south Asia. Heliyon, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2023.E13478
  4. Almodóvar-González, M., Fernández-Portillo, A., & Díaz-Casero, J. C. (2020). Entrepreneurial activity and economic growth. A multi-country analysis. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 26(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IEDEEN.2019.12.004
  5. Artika, I. G. K., & Utami, W. (2020). Percepatan Pembenahan Data Bidang Tanah Kluster 4 melalui Survei Data Pertanahan. BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan, 6(1), 66–79. https://doi.org/10.31292/JB.V6I1.425
  6. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2022). Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Indonesia 2022. Badan Pusat Statistik. https://www.bps.go.id/pressrelease/2023/02/06/1997/ekonomi-indonesia-tahun-2022-tumbuh-5-31-persen.html
  7. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2023). Kota Jakarta Barat Dalam Angka 2023. BPS Jakarta Barat. https://jakbarkota.bps.go.id/publication/2023/02/28/2bca41b5700a3ca105f32725/kota-jakarta-barat-dalam-angka-2023.html
  8. Carnohan, S. A., Trier, X., Liu, S., Clausen, L. P. W., Clifford-Holmes, J. K., Hansen, S. F., Benini, L., & McKnight, U. S. (2023). Next generation application of DPSIR for sustainable policy implementation. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 5, 100201. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CRSUST.2022.100201
  9. Dewi, S. R., Wulansari, H., Tilman, A., & Santoso, R. T. (2022). Optimalisasi migrasi dan pembaharuan data pertanahan dalam komputerisasi pertanahan di kabupaten Banyuasin. Tunas Agraria, 5(3), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.31292/JTA.V5I3.184
  10. Djankov, S., Glaeser, E., Perotti, V., & Shleifer, A. (2022). Property Rights and Urban Form. Https://Doi.Org/10.1086/718854, 65(S1), S35–S64. https://doi.org/10.1086/718854
  11. Eka Nur Rofi, A., Putra, F., & Gede Eko Putra Sri Sentanu, I. (2021). Creating Innovation of Public Value Through Management Information Systems. Jurnal Bina Praja: Journal of Home Affairs Governance, 13(3), 513–528. https://doi.org/10.21787/JBP.13.2021.513-528
  12. Federigi, I., Balestri, E., Castelli, A., De Battisti, D., Maltagliati, F., Menicagli, V., Verani, M., Lardicci, C., & Carducci, A. (2022). Beach pollution from marine litter: Analysis with the DPSIR framework (driver, pressure, state, impact, response) in Tuscany, Italy. Ecological Indicators, 143, 109395. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2022.109395
  13. Fitrianingsih, F., Riyadi, R., & Suharno, S. (2021). Evaluasi Digitalisasi Arsip Pertanahan dan Peta Bidang Tanah Terintegrasi Menuju Pelayanan Online. Tunas Agraria, 4(1), 54–81. https://doi.org/10.31292/JTA.V4I1.135
  14. Hajra, R., Mitra, R., & Ghosh, T. (2023). Sustainability assessment of Indian Sundarban delta islands using DPSIR framework in the context of natural hazards. Natural Hazards Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NHRES.2023.01.002
  15. Handono, A. B., Suhattanto, Muh. A., & Nugroho, A. (2020). Strategi Percepatan Peningkatan Kualitas Data Pertanahan di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Karanganyar. Tunas Agraria, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.31292/JTA.V3I3.125
  16. Indrajit, A. ;, Eresta Jaya, V., Van Loenen, B. ;, Snaidman, A. ;, Ploeger, H. ;, & Van Oosterom, P. J. M. (2019). Implementation of Spatial Planning Package for Construction of an LADM Country Profile Reducing Asymmetric Access to Information of RRRs in Indonesia.
  17. Indrajit, A., van Loenen, B., Suprajaka, Jaya, V. E., Ploeger, H., Lemmen, C., & van Oosterom, P. (2021). Implementation of the spatial plan information package for improving ease of doing business in Indonesian cities. Land Use Policy, 105, 105338. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2021.105338
  18. Irawan, D. S., & Wulansari, H. (2020). Pengukuran Pihak Ketiga Pasca Asas Contradictoire Delimitatie di Kabupaten Sidoarjo dan Pasuruan. Tunas Agraria, 3(2), 53–75. https://doi.org/10.31292/JTA.V3I2.107
  19. Iskandar, D., Janah, S. M., & Syaifudin, A. (2019). Computerized Application LOC (Land Office Computerization) At The National Land Agency For Land Certification Service Quality. Incomtech, 8(2), 63–68. https://ejournal.istn.ac.id/index.php/incomtech/article/view/546
  20. Jadesola Ololade, A., Odunayo Paul, S., Tolulope Morenike, A., & Augustina Esitse, D. (2023). Bolstering the role of human resource information system on employees’ behavioural outcomes of selected manufacturing firms in Nigeria. Heliyon, 9(1), e12785. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2022.E12785
  21. Kamal A.L.M, & Aboelsoud M.E. (2023). Modeling economic growth factors in Egypt: A quantile regression approach. Heliyon, 9, e13143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13143
  22. Kementerian Dalam Negeri. (2018). Peraturan Kementerian Dalam Negeri Nomor 20 Tahun 2018 tentang Pengelolaan Keuangan Desa. JDIH BPK. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/139714/permendagri-no-20-tahun-2018
  23. Kusmiarto, K., Aditya, T., Djurdjani, D., & Subaryono, S. (2021). Digital Transformation of Land Services in Indonesia: A Readiness Assessment. Land 2021, Vol. 10, Page 120, 10(2), 120. https://doi.org/10.3390/LAND10020120
  24. Martono, D. B., Aditya, T., Subaryono, S., & Nugroho, P. (2021). The Legal Element of Fixing the Boundary for Indonesian Complete Cadastre. Land 2021, Vol. 10, Page 49, 10(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/LAND10010049
  25. Mastika, I. K., Harsono, S. S., Khristianto, W., Oktawirani, P., & Hutama, P. S. (2023). Creative strategies of local resources in managing geotourism in the Ijen Geopark Bondowoso, East Java, Indonesia. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 11(1), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJGEOP.2023.01.002
  26. Mawadah, M., Pertanahan, K., & Grobogan, K. (2021). Peningkatan Kualitas Data Bidang Tanah di Kantor Pertanahan Kota Administrasi Jakarta Selatan. Tunas Agraria, 4(2), 168–174. https://doi.org/10.31292/JTA.V4I2.143
  27. Morales, G. I., Lee, S., Bradford, A., De Camp, A., & Tandoc, E. C. (2022). Exploring vaccine hesitancy determinants during the COVID-19 pandemic: An in-depth interview study. SSM - Qualitative Research in Health, 2, 100045. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SSMQR.2022.100045
  28. Mujiburohman D.A. (2021). Transformasi dari Kertas ke Elektronik: Telaah Yuridis dan Teknis Sertipikat Tanah Elektronik. BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan, 7(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.31292/bhumi.v7i1.472
  29. Mustofa F.C. (2020). Evaluation of Land Information System Development in The National Land Agency. BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan, 6(2), 158–171. https://doi.org/10.31292/BHUMI.V6I2.412
  30. Naibaho, M. (2021). Regional Innovation Policy in Encouraging Regional Competitiveness in South Tangerang City. Jurnal Bina Praja: Journal of Home Affairs Governance, 13(2), 269–279. https://doi.org/10.21787/JBP.13.2021.269-279
  31. Nayoan F, & Prasetyo K. (2020). Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Pembangunan Bagi Kepentingan Umum di Muara Rupit Sumatera Selatan. Tunas Agraria, 3(2), 86–100. https://doi.org/10.31292/JTA.V3I2.109
  32. Nugraheni, R. Y., Priyadi, B. P., & Kismartini, K. (2021). Inovasi Pelayanan Pertanahan Pengecekan Sertifikat online. PERSPEKTIF, 10(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.31289/perspektif.v10i1.4017
  33. Nur Y, & Sarwadi A. (2021). Analisa Stakeholder dalam Program Konsolidasi Tanah di Desa Gadingsari Kecamatan Sanden Kabupaten Bantul. Marcapada: Jurnal Kebijakan Pertanahan, 1(1), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.31292/JM.V1I1.8
  34. Nurcahyo J.D, Wahyono E.B, & Mujiburrohman D.A. (2019). Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap Berbasis Partisipasi Masyarakat (PTSL+PM) di Kabupaten Ngawi. Tunas Agraria, 2(3), 139–161. https://doi.org/10.31292/JTA.V2I3.43
  35. Pinuji, S. (2016). Integrasi Sistem Informasi Pertanahan Dan Infrastruktur Data Spasial Dalam Rangka Perwujudan One Map Policyâ€. BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan, 2(1), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.31292/JB.V2I1.31
  36. Prasetyawati, S. E., & DESLAPANA, D. (2021). Analisis Implementasi Peraturan Presiden Nomor 9 Tahun 2016 tentang Percepatan Pelaksanaan Kebijakan Satu Peta Pada Tingkat Ketelitian Peta Skala 1 : 50.000 (Studi Pada Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Lampung Utara). KEADILAN PROGRESIF, 12(2). http://jurnal.ubl.ac.id/index.php/KP/article/view/2398
  37. Purbawa, Y., Marryanti Prihatin, S., Wicaksono, A., Nugroho, R., Ratna Sari, H., & Atr, K. (2023). Public Acceptance of Electronic Land Certificate. 3–14. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-106-7_2
  38. Qu, S., Hu, S., Li, W., Wang, H., Zhang, C., & Li, Q. (2020). Interaction between urban land expansion and land use policy: An analysis using the DPSIR framework. Land Use Policy, 99, 104856. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2020.104856
  39. Quevedo, J. M. D., Lukman, K. M., Ulumuddin, Y. I., Uchiyama, Y., & Kohsaka, R. (2023). Applying the DPSIR framework to qualitatively assess the globally important mangrove ecosystems of Indonesia: A review towards evidence-based policymaking approaches. Marine Policy, 147, 105354. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MARPOL.2022.105354
  40. Rijali A. (2018). Analisis Data Kualitatif (Vol. 17, Issue 33).
  41. Rojul Huda, M. ’, & Yunas, N. S. (2016). The Development of e-Government System in Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja: Journal of Home Affairs Governance, 8(1), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.21787/JBP.08.2016.97-108
  42. Romero-Rodríguez, J. M., Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., Aznar-Díaz, I., & Hinojo-Lucena, F. J. (2020). Social Appropriation of Knowledge as a Key Factor for Local Development and Open Innovation: A Systematic Review. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(2), 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/JOITMC6020044
  43. Salim, H., Jackson, M., Stewart, R. A., & Beal, C. D. (2023). Drivers-pressures-state-impact-response of solid waste management in remote communities: A systematic and critical review. Cleaner Waste Systems, 4, 100078. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CLWAS.2023.100078
  44. Sampath, D. M. R., Freitas, J. G., & Dias, J. A. (2022). Extending the DPSIR framework to analyse Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response of sand dune management in Manawatu-Whanganui (New Zealand) since the 19th century. Ocean & Coastal Management, 230, 106348. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OCECOAMAN.2022.106348
  45. Sari, N. M. (2021). Information Service Activities on the Public Satisfaction Levels in the Public Service Mall of Palopo City. Jurnal Bina Praja: Journal of Home Affairs Governance, 13(2), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.21787/JBP.13.2021.219-229
  46. Simanungkalit E.F.B. (2020). Pengaruh Inflasi terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi di Indonesia. Journal of Management Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs), 13(3), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.35508/JOM.V13I3.3311
  47. Stienen, V. F., Wagenaar, J. C., den Hertog, D., & Fleuren, H. A. (2021). Optimal depot locations for humanitarian logistics service providers using robust optimization. Omega, 104, 102494. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OMEGA.2021.102494
  48. Suhattanto, M. A., Sarjita, S., Sukayadi, S., & Mujiburohman, D. A. (2021). Kualitas Data Pertanahan Menuju Pelayanan Sertifikat Tanah Elektronik. Widya Bhumi, 1(2), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.31292/WB.V1I2.11
  49. Supriadi. (2018). Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pelayanan Publik Di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Boyolali Melalui Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 Tentang Pelayanan Publik. Dinamika Hukum, 9(3), 343–354. https://doi.org/10.2/JQUERY.MIN.JS
  50. Suprojo, B., Rosyidi, F. A., & Pinuji, S. (2021). Pemetaan Tematik Dan Tata Ruang Kepulauan Lengkap Berbasis Sistem Informasi Geografis Agar Tercapainya Manajemen Pertanahan. Elipsoida : Jurnal Geodesi Dan Geomatika, 4(2), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.14710/ELIPSOIDA.2021.15157
  51. Surya, B., Ahmad, D. N. A., Sakti, H. H., & Sahban, H. (2020). Land Use Change, Spatial Interaction, and Sustainable Development in the Metropolitan Urban Areas, South Sulawesi Province, Indonesia. Land 2020, Vol. 9, Page 95, 9(3), 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/LAND9030095
  52. Susanto, S. (2019). Konflik dan resolusi konflik: Pendekatan analytical hierarchy process dalam konflik pertanahan di Urutsewu, Kebumen. JIIP: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan, 4(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.14710/JIIP.V4I1.4783
  53. Teku L.M.K.P, Mujiati M, & Mujiburohman D.A. (2022). Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan Melalui Perbaikan Kualitas Data Pertanahan Di Kabupaten Manggarai Barat. PERSPEKTIF, 11(2), 779–785. https://doi.org/10.31289/perspektif.v11i2.6120
  54. Tresna, T., Asmara, P., Ikhwansyah, I., & Afriana, A. (2019). Ease of Doing Business: Gagasan Pembaruan Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Investasi di Indonesia. University Of Bengkulu Law Journal, 4(2), 118–136. https://doi.org/10.33369/UBELAJ.4.2.125-143
  55. Triandaru L, Amberi M, Oktavianoor T, & Hidayat M.F. (2021). Kolaborasi Stakeholder Dalam Reforma Agraria Dengan Pola Redistribusi Tanah di Kabupaten Hulu Sungai Selatan. Kolaborasi : Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 7(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.26618/KJAP.V7I2.5655
  56. Usman, K., & Bashir, U. (2022). The causal nexus between imports and economic growth in China, India and G7 countries: granger causality analysis in the frequency domain. Heliyon, 8(8), e10180. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2022.E10180
  57. Wargadinata, E., Aly, E. S., & Alma’arif, A. (2022). Evaluation of Jakarta Province in Information and Technology Management. Jurnal Bina Praja: Journal of Home Affairs Governance, 14(3), 453–464. https://doi.org/10.21787/JBP.14.2022.453-464
  58. Wen, Y., Song, P., Gao, C., & Yang, D. (2023). Economic openness, innovation and economic growth: Nonlinear relationships based on policy support. Heliyon, 9(1), e12825. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2023.E12825
  59. World Bank. (n.d.). Registering Property Topic Analysis - Doing Business - World Bank Group. World Bank. Retrieved March 17, 2023, from https://subnational.doingbusiness.org/en/data/exploretopics/registering-property/what-measured
  60. Wulan, D. R., Salim, M. N., & Rineksi, W. T. (2022). Re-Scanning the Electronic Certificate Infrastructure (Sertipikat-el). Marcapada: Jurnal Kebijakan Pertanahan, 2(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.31292/MJ.V2I1.24
  61. Xi, H., Chen, Y., Zhao, X., Sindikubwabo, C., & Cheng, W. (2023). Safety assessment of fragile environment in Badain Jaran Desert and its surrounding areas based on the DPSIR model. Ecological Indicators, 146, 109874. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2023.109874
  62. Zaman, M., Pinglu, C., Hussain, S. I., Ullah, A., & Qian, N. (2021). Does regional integration matter for sustainable economic growth? Fostering the role of FDI, trade openness, IT exports, and capital formation in BRI countries. Heliyon, 7(12), e08559. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2021.E08559

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.