Participatory Budgeting in Surakarta, Indonesia: Pro-Poor Approach

Akbarudin Arif, Agus Kristiyanto, Cahyo Seftyono, Sapja Anantanyu, Haryani Saptaningtyas, Bonn Juego, Tulus Widayat

Abstract


This study explores the pro-poor orientation of Participatory Budgeting (PB) in Surakarta, Indonesia, with a focus on its effectiveness in enhancing socioeconomic conditions for impoverished and marginalized groups. Using a qualitative methodology involving observations, legal document analysis, and interviews with underprivileged citizens and key stakeholders, the research seeks to address two core questions: To what extent is PB in Surakarta truly pro-poor, and what key challenges hinder its role in poverty alleviation? Findings indicate that Surakarta’s PB system has made notable strides in inclusivity, prioritizing budget allocations that enhance access to essential services like healthcare and education for disadvantaged communities. Additionally, the village-delegated budget system empowers local residents to address specific needs, supporting efforts to improve quality of life. However, persistent challenges remain; despite PB’s inclusive design and community participation, poverty rates have seen limited reduction. This study underscores the need for an increased delegated budget alongside strengthened social accountability mechanisms and enhanced community empowerment programs to achieve sustainable poverty alleviation. These findings contribute valuable insights into the dynamics of pro-poor governance and highlight critical areas for strengthening participatory frameworks in Indonesia’s local governance.

 

Studi ini mengeksplorasi pelaksanaan Musyawarah Perencanaan Pembangunan (Musrenbang) di Surakarta, Indonesia, dengan fokus pada efektivitasnya dalam meningkatkan kondisi sosial-ekonomi bagi kelompok masyarakat miskin dan termarjinalkan. Dengan menggunakan metodologi kualitatif yang meliputi observasi, analisis dokumen hukum, dan wawancara dengan warga kurang mampu serta pemangku kepentingan utama, penelitian ini berupaya menjawab dua pertanyaan utama: Sejauh mana Musrenbang di Surakarta benar-benar berpihak pada kaum miskin, dan tantangan utama apa yang menghambat perannya dalam pengentasan kemiskinan? Temuan menunjukkan bahwa sistem Musrenbang di Surakarta telah mencapai kemajuan berarti dalam inklusivitas, memprioritaskan alokasi anggaran yang meningkatkan akses ke layanan penting seperti kesehatan dan pendidikan bagi komunitas yang kurang beruntung. Selain itu, sistem anggaran yang dilimpahkan ke tingkat desa memungkinkan penduduk lokal untuk memenuhi kebutuhan spesifik, yang mendukung upaya peningkatan kualitas hidup. Namun, tantangan yang berkelanjutan masih ada; meskipun desain Musrenbang yang inklusif dan partisipasi masyarakat, tingkat kemiskinan hanya mengalami sedikit penurunan. Studi ini menekankan perlunya peningkatan anggaran yang dilimpahkan, bersama dengan mekanisme akuntabilitas sosial yang lebih kuat serta program pemberdayaan komunitas yang ditingkatkan untuk mencapai pengentasan kemiskinan yang berkelanjutan. Temuan ini memberikan wawasan berharga mengenai dinamika tata kelola yang pro-kaum miskin dan menyoroti area penting untuk memperkuat kerangka kerja partisipatif dalam tata kelola lokal di Indonesia.


Keywords


Participatory budgeting; acceleration for inclusion; poverty reduction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arif, A. (2019). Dinamika Politik Lokal Menuju Demokrasi yang Menyejahterakan – Refleksi Aktifis Solo di Masa Bakti Walikota Joko Widodo. Doctoral Degree Program, Political and Social Science Department, UGM.

Box, R. , M. G. , R. B. and R. C. (2001). New public management and substantive democracy. Public Administration Review, 61(5), 608–619.

Cabannes, Y. (2014). Contribution of Participatory Budgeting to provision and management of basic service. Published by IIED.

Carolina, J. , H. Carlson, J., & Reynolds, S. (2023). Testing the Participation Hypothesis: Evidence from Participatory Budgeting. Political Behavior , 45, 3–32.

CEPA strategy guidance note on Participatory budgeting, The United Nations Committee of Experts on Public Administration (CEPA). (2022).

Conning, J. , & Levine, M. (2002). Community-based targeting mechanism for social safety nets: A critical review. World Development, 30(03), 375–394.

Cooke, B. , & Kothari, U. (2001). Participation: The new tyranny? Zed Books.

Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2003). Thinking about empowered participatory governance.

Gaventa, J. (2006). Finding the Spaces for Change: A Power Analysis, Power. UK: Institute for Development Studies, 37(6).

Gilman, H., & Wampler, B. (2019). The Difference in Design: Participatory Budgeting in Brazil and the United States. Journal of Public Deliberation, 15(1).

Grillos, T. (2017). Participatory Budgeting and the Poor: Tracing Bias in a Multi-Staged Process in Solo, Indonesia. World Development , 96.

Hagelskamp, C. , Silliman, R., B. Godfrey, E. , & Schleifer, D. (2020). Shifting priorities: participatory budgeting in New York City is associated with increased investments in schools, street and traffic improvements, and public housing. New Political Science, 42(2), 171–196.

Haussy, M. (2021). Case Study: Participatory Budgeting in Brazil. Updating Democracy. Rebooting the State.

Holdo, M. (2020). Contestation in Participatory Budgeting: Spaces, Boundaries, and Agency: American Behavioral Scientist . SAGE Publications, 64(9), 1348–1365.

Humphreys, M. , Masters, W. A. , & Sandbu, M. E. (2006). The role of leaders in democratic deliberations: Results from a field experiment in Sa˜o Tome´ and Pr´ıncipe. World Politics, , 58(04), 583–622.

Johnson, C. , & Carlson, J. , R. S. (2023). Testing the Participation Hypothesis: Evidence from Participatory Budgeting. Political Behavior , 45, 3–32.

Kurkela, K., Pulkkinen, M., & Lotta-Maria Sinervo. (2023). Premises for sustainability – participatory budgeting as a way to construct collaborative innovation capacity in local government. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management.

Lewandowska, A., & Justyna Chodkowska-Miszczuk. (2022). The role of participation in the development of the smart city idea: frameworks, opportunities, mechanisms, Bulletin of Geography. Socio-Economic Series, 57, 93–111.

Mawardi, S., & Sumarto, S. (2003, October 24). Kebijakan Publik yang Memihak Orang Miskin, Smeru Makalah disampaikan pada Pelatihan Fasilitator-Kabupaten dan Koordinator Regional Prakarsa Pembaruan Tata Pemerintahan Daerah (F-KAB dan KR P2TPD), . Yogjakarta.

Mayor Surakarta Regulation No 6- year 2021. (2021). on City Vision and Mission (RPJMD) year 2021-2026.

Michels A. (2011). Innovations in democratic governance: How does citizen participation contribute to a better democracy. International Review of Administrative Sciences , 77(2), 275–293.

Miller, P., & O’Leary, T. (2007). Mediating instruments and making markets: capital budgeting, science and the economy. Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 20(2/3), 219–237.

Perry-Smith JE, & Mannucci PV. (2017). From creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey. Academy of Management Review , 42(1), 53–79.

Platteau, J. P. (2004). Monitoring elite capture in community-driven development. . Development and Change, 35(2), 223–246.

Shah, A. (2007). Participatory budgeting. Public sector governance and accountability. World Bank.

Silvia, R., & Lutfi, A. (2022). Participatory budgeting: Lessons for Indonesia. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 8(01), 113–122.

Sintomer Y, H. C., & Röcke A. (2008). Participatory budgeting in Europe: Potentials and challenges. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research , 32(1), 164–178.

Spada, P. , & Vreeland, J. R. (2013). Spada, P., & Vreeland, J. R. (2013). Who moderates the moderators? The effect of non-neutral moderators in deliberative decision making. Journal of Public Deliberation, 9(2).

Subhanullah, R. H. , Y. I. (2019). The Influence of Budget Participation, Budget Goals Clarity and Internal Control Systems Implementation on Local Government Performanc. Journal of Accounting Auditing and Business , 2(2).

Surbakti, R. (2005). Memahami ilmu politik. Grasindo.

Syukri, M. (2023). Gender Policies of the New Developmental State: The Case of Indonesian New Participatory Village Governance. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 42(1), 110–133.

Tseng, Y.-S. (2023). Dialectical approach to unpacking knowledge-making for digital urban democracy: A critical case of Helsinki-based e-participatory budgeting. Urban Studies Journal.

Urszula K, & Zawadzka-Pąk. (2022). Participatory Budgeting as the Instrument of Technologically Supported Dialogue in Cracow. , Journal of European Studies Tallinn University of Technology, 12(2), 36.

Wampler, B. (2007). Participatory Budgeting in Brazil: Contestation, Cooperation, and Accountability. USA: Pennsylvania State University Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/jgcs.v8i2.11155

Article Metrics

Abstract - 503 PDF - 274

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Journal of Government and Civil Society is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License