Framing Power in Japan’s Digital Sphere: A Corpus-Based Functional Approach

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31000/nyimak.v10i1.15221

Abstract

The emergence of the term “Japanese First†in public media discourse can be traced to the second quarter of 2025, based on documented reports and news coverage collected during the data compilation period. This study conducts a comparative analysis of political representations of the Japanese First issues by contrasting coverage in the English-language press and Indonesian-language press on online discourses. Drawing on a corpus-driven investigation of 45 news articles published in online discourses from July to September 2025, we disseminate how different news agencies represent, legitimise, and stigmatise the Japanese First issues.  This study utilises a mixed method consisting of quantitative analysis to provide statistical analysis for linguistic features and qualitative analysis to describe the usage of its features, such as keywords, collocations, and KWIC, which are related to our study. The research combines a corpus-based approach with discourse analysis (CADA) to investigate language use in relation to transitivity analysis. The findings of our analysis reveal differences in transitivity patterns between two corpora in the news articles published in different languages. English-language discourse tends to emphasis perceptual and ideological framing that associates parties with specific values, beliefs, and moral imagery while the Indonesian-language discourse predominantly portrays the performative actions of parties.

Keywords: Language and ideology, Japanese First, transivitas halliday, online discourse

 

ABSTRAK

Munculnya istilah "Japanese First" dalam wacana media publik dapat ditelusuri hingga kuartal II-2025, berdasarkan laporan terdokumentasi dan liputan berita yang dikumpulkan selama periode kompilasi data. Studi ini melakukan analisis komparatif representasi politik dari isu-isu Jepang Pertama dengan membandingkan liputan di pers berbahasa Inggris dan pers berbahasa Indonesia pada wacana online. Berdasarkan investigasi yang digerakkan oleh korpus dari 45 artikel berita yang diterbitkan dalam wacana online dari Juli hingga September 2025, kami mengeksplorasi bagaimana berbagai kantor berita merepresentasikan, melegitimasi, dan menstigmatisasi masalah Japanese First.  Penelitian ini menggunakan metode campuran yang terdiri dari analisis kuantitatif untuk memberikan analisis statistik untuk fitur linguistik dan analisis kualitatif untuk menggambarkan penggunaan fitur-fiturnya, seperti kata kunci, kolokasi, dan KWIC, yang terkait dengan penelitian kami. Penelitian ini menggabungkan pendekatan berbasis korpus dengan analisis wacana (CADA) untuk menyelidiki penggunaan bahasa dalam kaitannya dengan analisis transitivitas. Temuan analisis kami mengungkapkan perbedaan pola transitivitas antara dua korpus dalam artikel berita yang diterbitkan dalam bahasa yang berbeda. Wacana berbahasa Inggris cenderung menekankan pembingkaian perseptual dan ideologis yang mengasosiasikan partai dengan nilai, keyakinan, dan citra moral tertentu sementara wacana berbahasa Indonesia sebagian besar menggambarkan tindakan performatif para pihak.

Kata Kunci: Bahasa dan kekuasaan, Japanese First, transivitas halliday, wacana daring

Author Biographies

  • Ketut Gede Adi Putra Laksana, Yogyakarta State University
    Master of Applied Linguistics
  • Rohali Rohali, Yogyakarta State University
    Master of Applied Linguistics
  • I Kadek Purnawan, Nanzan University
    Department of Asian Studies, Faculty of Foreign Languages
    Nanzan University, Japan
  • Ni Di Ya, Ming Chi University of Taiwan
    International Master Business Administration

References

Bergmann, E. (2020). Introduction: The Rise of Nativist Populism. In Neo-Nationalism: The Rise of Nativist Populism (pp. 1-28). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Bergmann, E. (2020). Neo-Nationalism: The Rise of Nativist Populism. Palgrave Macmillan.

Bergmann, E. (2020). Understanding nativist populism. In Neo-Nationalism: The Rise of Nativist Populism (pp. 29–52). Springer.

Biber, D. (2015). Corpus-based and corpus-driven analyses of language variation and use. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.013.0008

Cameron, D. (2013). Ideology and language. In The meaning of ideology (pp. 136–147). Routledge.

Capobianco, P. (2019). Migration and identity: Japan’s changing relationship with otherness (Master’s thesis). The University of Iowa.

Chen, Y., & Ma, X. (2025). Revisiting the role and potential of corpus linguistics in critical discourse analysis. Pacific International Journal, 8(4), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.55014/pij.v8i4.823

Eatwell, R., & Goodwin, M. (2018). National populism: The revolt against liberal democracy. Pelican Books.

Entman, R. M., Matthes, J., & Pellicano, L. (2009). Nature, sources, and effects of news framing. In The handbook of journalism studies (pp. 195–210). Routledge.

Fernández Torres, M. J., Cea, N., & Martín Martín, F. (2026). Strategic use of disinformation terminology in political communication: Media narratives of delegitimisation. Social Sciences, 15(2), 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15020063

Firdausi, A. N., & Sahayu, W. (2022). Kompas.com and The Jakarta Post Covid-19 news articles representation: A critical discourse analysis. Diksi, 30(2), 177–187. https://doi.org/10.21831/diksi.v30i2.46643

Fitri, F. (2025). Bahasa, identitas, dan slang politik: Transformasi linguistik digital di YouTube. Indonesian Journal of Linguistics, 2(2), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.33005/ijl.v2i2.63

Gablasova, D., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T. (2017). Collocations in corpus-based language learning research: Identifying, comparing, and interpreting the evidence. Language Learning, 67(S1), 155–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12225

Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P., & Bou-Franch, P. (2018). Introduction to analyzing digital discourse: New insights and future directions. In Analyzing digital discourse: New insights and future directions (pp. 3–22). Springer.

Hosokawa, N. (2015). Nationalism and linguistic purism in contemporary Japan: National sentiment expressed through public attitudes towards foreignisms. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism, 15(1), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/sena.12135

Jesudas, R. (2024). Transitivity analysis in Allende’s “And of Clay Are We Createdâ€: Language, emotion, and social commentary. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(2). https://journal.eltaorganization.org/index.php/joal/index

Kawamura, S., & Iwabuchi, K. (2022). Making neo-nationalist subject in Japan: The intersection of nationalism, jingoism, and populism in the digital age. Communication and the Public, 7(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/20570473211073932

Krisberg, K., & Verga, D. (2018). What’s in a word? How language affects public health: Research shows word choices can influence well-being, treatment. Nation’s Health, 48(2), 1–10.

Matrood, D. T. (2025). Language and digital identity: A sociolinguistic study of online communities. Frontiers in Global Research, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.55559/fgr.v1i2.1

Matsuda, P. K. (2002). Negotiation of identity and power in a Japanese online discourse community. Computers and Composition, 19(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(02)00079-8

Merklejn, I., & Wiœlicki, J. (2020). Hate speech and the polarization of Japanese national newspapers. Social Science Japan Journal, 23(2), 259–279. https://doi.org/10.1093/ssjj/jyaa015

Nainggolan, E. T., Godliebe, G., & Hadi, W. (2024). Analisis penggunaan bahasa dalam propaganda politik di media sosial. Jurnal Bahasa Daerah Indonesia, 1(3), 8. https://doi.org/10.47134/jbdi.v1i3.2606

Osman, O. (2025). Whose Voices Shape Protest Narratives? Comparing Source Diversity in Kenya’s Digital-Native and Legacy-Affiliated News Coverage. Journalism Studies, 26(13), 1617-1629

Pajnik, M., & Sauer, B. (Eds.). (2024). Populism and the Web: Communicative Practices of Parties and Movements in Europe. Routledge.

Pang, J. (2025). Analyzing cognitive bias in language: A linguistic perspective on Fox News and CNN. Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.61173/g16veg69

Pavliuc, A. (2025). Gender and narrative in digital political communication. International Journal of Communication Research, 15(2), 90–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/17506352241309225

Pineda, J. E., & Gumban, E. A. (2025). Transitivity as ideational scaffolding and evidentiality as interpersonal positioning in political interviews. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 8(5), 3136–3144. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v8-i5-57

Rosita, F. Y., & Jannah, M. N. (2025). Politik wacana pada berita Pilpres 2019 di media daring Vivanews.com. Jurnal Komunikasi, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.20885/komunikasi.vol14.iss2.art4

Roslyng, M. M., & Dindler, C. (2023). Media power and politics in framing and discourse theory. Communication Theory, 33(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtac012

Supatmiwati, D., Hastuti, H., Indra, I., Fissilmi, A., Zuhroni, Z., & Putri, T. R. (2025). Ideology and communication strategy of Indonesia’s 2024 presidential candidates: A transitivity analysis. Humanitatis: Journal of Language and Literature, 11(2), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.30812/humanitatis.v11i2.4996

Suwarno, S. (2025). Palestine and Israel representation in the national and international news media: A critical discourse study. Jurnal Humaniora. https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.52911

Tasneem, M. (2025). Analyzing Corpus-Derived Lexico-Grammatical Patterns Including Lexical Choices Modality Transitivity and Evaluative Language in Online News Portals and Social Media News Discourse to Identify Ideological Positioning Using a Corpus-Assisted Discourse Appro. Social Science Review Archives, 3(4), 2842-2855.

Thompson, J. B. (1987). Language and ideology: A framework for analysis. The Sociological Review, 35(3), 516–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1987.tb00554.x

Tsuneyoshi, R. (2019). Discussing the “multicultural†in Japanese society. In Education in Japan: A comprehensive analysis of education reforms and practices (pp. 177–195). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2632-5_11

Wright, R. L., & Hailu, H. F. (1988). Conceptualizing language as ideology. Howard Journal of Communications, 1(4), 174–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646178809359690

Downloads

Published

2026-03-18