Kredit Usaha Rakyat (KUR) Regulation and Communication Factors towards Farmer Independence

Anna Gustina Zainal; Toni Wijaya; Selly Oktarina; Eko Wahyono; Pairulsyah Pairulsyah

doi:10.31000/nyimak.v5i1.2871

Kredit Usaha Rakyat (KUR) Regulation and Communication Factors towards Farmer Independence

Anna Gustina Zainal, Toni Wijaya, Selly Oktarina, Eko Wahyono, Pairulsyah Pairulsyah

Abstract

This study aims to determine: (1) the level of understanding of farmers about government regulations related to KUR funds in the Agriculture sector, (2) communication patterns and behavior as well as the use of farmer media types associated with KUR management in the agricultural sector (3) the relationship between communication patterns and behavior and the use of sector is aimed at educating farmers’ independence in managing their farming so that the food security program continuously improving. This research was designed as a descriptive correlational approach using the survey method. The research targets are farmer groups participating in the KUR program in the Agriculture sector covering five sub Districts, namely: Gading Rejo, Kotaa Agung, Gisting, Talang Padang, and Semaka, in Tanggamus District. Based on the results of the research, it is known that the understanding of farmers about the procedure for applying for KUR in the agricultural sector, rights and obligations and sanctions for violations, and management of KUR funds in the agricultural sector that they get on average are in the quite good category. Besides, there are significant differences in communication patterns and behavior as well as the use of types of media, causing farmers to understand different KUR programs in the Agriculture sector. Especially in the factor of communication patterns, communication behavior, and the use of the type of media that farmers choose. The relationship between communication patterns, individual farmer characteristics, behavior, communication, and the use of media types is quite varied.

Keywords: Agriculture sector, communication patterns, farmer, regulation

ABSTRAK

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) tingkat pemahaman petani tentang peraturan pemerintah terkait dana KUR di sektor Pertanian, (2) pola dan perilaku komunikasi serta penggunaan jenis media petani yang terkait dengan pengelolaan KUR di bidang pertanian. sektor (3) keterkaitan antara pola komunikasi dan perilaku dengan pemanfaatan sektor bertujuan untuk mendidik kemandirian petani dalam mengelola usahataninya sehingga program ketahanan pangan terus meningkat. Penelitian ini dirancang dengan pendekatan deskriptif korelasional dengan menggunakan metode survei. Sasaran penelitian adalah kelompok tani peserta program KUR bidang Pertanian yang meliputi lima kecamatan, yaitu: Gading Rejo, Kota Agung, Gisting, Talang Padang, dan Semaka, di Kabupaten Tanggamus. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diketahui bahwa pemahaman petani tentang tata cara pengajuan KUR di sektor pertanian, hak dan kewajiban serta sanksi atas pelanggaran, dan pengelolaan dana KUR di sektor pertanian yang mereka dapatkan rata-rata. termasuk dalam kategori cukup baik. Selain itu terdapat perbedaan pola komunikasi dan perilaku serta penggunaan jenis media yang sangat berbeda sehingga menyebabkan petani memahami berbagai program KUR di sektor Pertanian. Terutama pada faktor pola komunikasi, perilaku komunikasi, dan penggunaan jenis media yang dipilih petani. Hubungan antara pola komunikasi, karakteristik individu petani, perilaku, komunikasi, dan penggunaan jenis media cukup bervariasi.

Kata Kunci: Sektor pertanian, pola komunikasi, petani, regulasi

Full Text:

PDF

References

Alif, M. (2017). Partisipasi Petani dalam Komunikasi Penyuluhan. Metacommunication, Journal Of Communication Studie, 2 (2), 155-168. https://ppjp.ulm.ac.id/journal/index.php/MC/article/view/4416.

Ammaria, H. (2017). Komunikasi Budaya. Jurnal Peurawi Vol.1 (1), 1-19.

Andriaty, E., Bambang, S., & Setyorini, E. (2011). Kajian kebutuhan informasi teknologi pertanian di beberapa kabupaten di Jawa. JPerpusPert. Vol. 20 No. 2, 54-61.

Asra, e. (2015). Review of Social Media Potential on Knowledge Sharing and Collaboration in Tourism Industry. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 172, 111-121.

Aufirandra, F., Bunga, A., & Syifa, U. (2017). Komunikasi Mempengaruhi Tingkah Laku Individu. Jurnal Penelitian Guru Indonesia Vol. 2 (2), 9-15.

Blazenaite, A. (2011). Effective Organizational Communication: in Search of a System. Socialiniai Mokslai, Vol. 4(74), 34-44.

BPS. (2018). Data Statistik Kependudukan Nasional. Jakarta: [diunduh 13 Agustus 2019] Tersedia pada https://www.bps.go.id.

Cangara, H. (2015). Introduction to Communication Studies. Second printing. Jakarta (ID): PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Cavatassi, R., & et al. (2011). Linking smallholders to the new agricultural economy: the case of the plataformas de concertación in Ecuador. Journal of Development Studies 4: 1545-1573.

Chmielecki, M. (2015). Factors Influencing Effectiveness of Internal Communication. Management and Business Administration. Central Europe 23 (2), 24-38.

Cummings, C., & O'Neil, T. (2015). Do digital information and communications technologies increase the voice and influence women and girls? A rapid review of the evidence. Literature Review, 1-33.

Damanik, I. P., & Tahitu, M. E. (2020). The Communication Behaviour of Farmers and Strategies to Strengthen the Capacity of Information Access in the Era of Industrial Revolution 4.0 in Ambon City. Jurnal Penyuluhan, 16(1), 92-104. https://doi.org/10.2501.

Fill, C. (1995). Marketing CommunicationsFrameworks, theories, and applications. UK: Prentice-Hall International.

Hamzah, e. (2013). Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi Dalam Upaya Peningkatan Aksesibilitas Ukm (Desa Wisata) Kepada Pasar Di Lokasi Wisata Pangandaran Dan Sekitarnya. . Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 1-12.

Health, R., & Bryant, J. (2000). Human communication theory and research - concepts, contexts, and challenges. New Jersey (USA): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Herminingsih, H., & Rokhani, R. (2014). Pengaruh Perubahan Iklim Terhadap Perilaku Petani Tembakau Di Kabupaten Jember. Jurnal Matematika Sains Dan Teknologi 15(1), 42-51.

Javid, H. (2019). Institutionalization Of Media Communications In Social Policy Representation. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 834-840.

Ledbetter, A. (2014). The past and future of technology in interpersonal communication theory and research. Studies 65(4), 456-459.

Littejhon, S. (2011). Theories of Human Communication 7th ed. Belmont. California: Wards Worth Publishing Co.

Luthra, A., & Richa, D. (2015). Effective Leadership is all About Communicating Effectively: Connecting Leadership and Communication. International Journal of Management & Business Studies (IJMBS) Vol. 5 (3), 43-48.

May, D., Arancibia, S., Behrendt, K., & Adams, J. (2019). Preventing Young Farmers from Leaving the Farm the Effectiveness of Investigation the Young Farmer Payment Using a Behavioural Approach. Land Use Policy 82, 317-327.

Mulema, A., & Mazur, R. (2016). Motivation and participation in multi-stakeholder innovation platforms in the Great Lakes Region of Africa. Community Dev. J. 51, 212-228.

Mulyana, S., Duddy, Z., & Agus, S. (2017). Communication Pattern of Women Migrant Workers Family at Sliyeg District in Indramayu - West Java. ISKI Communication Journal, Vol. II (02), 92-96 .2017.doi.org/ 10.25008/jetski.v2i2.88.

Nothhaf. (2016). A framework for strategic communication research: A call for synthesis and consilience. International Journal of Strategic Communication. 10, 69-86. doi:10.1080/1553118X.2015.1124277.

Oktarina, S., Zulfiningrum, R., Zainal, A., Alif, M., & Wahyono, E. (2020). The role of communication and farmer institutional urgency to the agriculture development program. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 7(11), 266-276.

Pajriah, S. N., Nugroho, D., & Alamsyah, F. (2019). Analisis Hubungan Keterdedahan Media dengan Partisipasi Berpolitik Mahasiswa pada Program Indonesia Lawyers Club di TV One (Kasus Mahasiswa Ilmu Politik Insitut Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Jakarta). JURNAL APIK, 1 (2), 1-17.

Partomo, T., & Soejoedono, A. (2004). Ekonomi Skala Kecil/Menengah &. Koperasi. Bogor (ID): Ghalia.

Purwanto, E., Sumardjo, Hapsari, D., & Wibowo. (2020). Communication Patterns in the Development of Life Skills at the Darul Fallah Islamic Boarding School in Bogor Regency. Nyimak Journal of Communication 4 (2), 267-278.

Ruck, K., & Welch, M. (2012). Valuing Internal Communication; Management and Employees Perspectives. Public Relations Review, 38, 294-302.

Sabarofek, Margareth, S., Sawaki, & Magriet, E. (2017). Pengaruh Karakteristik Individu, Budaya Kerja dan Perilaku Individu terhadap Kinerja Karyawan: Studi kasus pada PT. Televisi Independen Papua. . JRMB, 12 (2), 93-106.

Santosa, P. (2009). Public Administration: Theory and Application of Good Government. . Bandung (ID): Refika Asitama.

Schoeneborn, D., & Blaschke, S. (2014). The three schools of CCO thinking: Interactive dialogue and systematic comparison. Management Communication Quarterly. 28, 285-316. doi:10.1177/0893318914527000.

Silalahi. (2011). Metode Penelitian Sosial. Bandung (ID): PT. Refika Aditama.

Soekanto, S. (2013). Sociology An Introduction (revised edition). Jakarta (ID): Rajawali Press.

Umajyothi. (2014). Participation, Constraints, and Communication Pattern of Tribal Women in Income Generating Activities. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 5(3), 1726-1728.

Vidales, G. (2011). El relativismo teórico en comunicación. Entre la comunicación como principio explicativo y la comunicación como disciplina práctica. Comunicación y sociedad (16), 11-45.

Wahyono, E. (2019). Komunikasi Kelompok : Studi Dialog Komunitas Dalam Pengembangan Masyarakat di Perkotaan. Nyimak Journal of Communication, 113-130.

West, R., & Turner, H. (2017). Pengantar Teori Komunikasi Analysis dan Aplikasi. Jakarta (ID): Salemba Humanika.

Yuniati, S., Susilo, D., & Albayumi, F. (2017). Penguatan Kelembagaan dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Petani Tebu. SNAPER EBIS, (pp. 498-505).

Zainal et al. (2019). Women's communication attitude in Pepadun marriage in the digital era. Option 35 (89), 2899-2921.

Zainal, & et.al. (2019). Community Development Communication Model And Improving The Role Of Agropolitan Institutions. International Journal Of Scientific & Technology Research 8 (12):, 2028-2034.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/nyimak.v5i1.2871