.png)
Communicative Model of Presidential Chief of Staff in Decision Making of Public Policy
Abstract
This research examined the communicative institution of the presidential chief staff of the Republic of Indonesia during Jokowi’s administration. The purpose of this research was to find a communicative model applied by the presidential chief staff in making public decisions. The theory used was the role of Communicative Constitutive of Organization, the management concept of bureaucracy and public office, and the rational model of public decision making. The method used in this research was case study in which cases analyzed from policies through interview and observation, and literature study. The results of the research on decision-making processes of public policies based on national development planning in Jokowi’s Nawacita were institutional communications carried out by the Presidential Chief of Staff (PCS) in the form of monitoring, solving barriers related to bureaucracy management in communication toward public through various online media, talk shows, and news. Communication across institutions and internal communication were carried out exclusively. Based on rational decision making, the communicative model of the presidential chief of staff was one-way process providing no room for discussion or negotiation involving the community. stakeholder external participation in the institutional communicative model were in ministry department, non-institutional department, provincial, district, and city governments.
Keywords: Model, communicative, presidential, public policy, decision making
ABSTRAK
Studi ini mengkaji kelembagaan komunikatif para staf Kepala Kepresidenan Republik Indonesia pada masa pemerintahan Jokowi. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui model komunikatif yang diterapkan oleh jajaran pimpinan presiden dalam pengambilan keputusan publik. Teori yang digunakan adalah peran Konstitutif Komunikatif Organisasi, konsep manajemen birokrasi dan jabatan publik, dan model rasional pengambilan keputusan publik. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah studi kasus di mana analisis kasus dari kebijakan melalui wawancara dan observasi, serta studi pustaka. Hasil penelitian proses pengambilan keputusan kebijakan publik berdasarkan perencanaan pembangunan nasional dalam Nawacita Jokowi adalah komunikasi kelembagaan yang dilakukan oleh Kepala Staf Kepresidenan (PCS) dalam bentuk pemantauan, penyelesaian hambatan terkait pengelolaan birokrasi dalam komunikasi menuju publik melalui berbagai media online, talk show, dan berita. Komunikasi lintas institusi dan komunikasi internal dilakukan secara eksklusif. Berdasarkan pengambilan keputusan yang rasional, model komunikatif Kepala Staf Kepresidenan merupakan proses satu arah yang tidak memberikan ruang untuk diskusi atau negosiasi yang melibatkan masyarakat. Partisipasi eksternal pemangku kepentingan dalam model komunikatif kelembagaan berada di departemen kementerian, departemen non-kelembagaan, pemerintah provinsi, kabupaten, dan kota.
Kata Kunci: Model, komunikatif, presidensial, kebijakan publik, pengambilan keputusan
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bang Nguyen Dilip S. Mutum. (2015). 0®À (Article) @Æ HÅ´°8" (Information) [. The Electronic Library, 34(1), 1-5.
Burkhalter, S. (2009). Managing the President's Message: The White House Communications Operation , by Martha Joynt Kumar . Political Communication, 26(3), 360-362. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600903037638
Dodge, J. (2019). Anticipating the future in a violent field: an extension of Lasswell's policy sciences. Critical Policy Studies, 13(2), 216-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2019.1625418
Faber, B., Budding, T., & Gradus, R. (2020). Assessing social media use in Dutch municipalities: Political, institutional, and socio-economic determinants. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101484
Finn, J. (2011). Collaborative knowledge construction in digital environments: Politics, policy, and communities. Government Information Quarterly, 28(3), 409-415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.10.004
Grant, B., & Government, L. (2018). Local Government in Australia: History, Theory, and Public Policy Bligh Grant & Joseph Drew (2017). Singapore: Springer Nature. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 77(1), 145-146. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12302
Imesha Dharmasena, M. K. G., Toledano, M., & Weaver, C. K. (2020). The role of public relations in building community resilience to natural disasters: perspectives from Sri Lanka and New Zealand. Journal of Communication Management, 24(4), 301-317. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-11-2019-0144
Johannessen, M. R., Sæbø, Ø., & Flak, L. S. (2016). Social media as a public sphere: a stakeholder perspective. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 10(2), 212-238. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-01-2015-0003
Kiousis, S., & Strömbäck, J. (2010). The White House and public relations: Examining the linkages between presidential communications and public opinion. Public Relations Review, 36(1), 7-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.08.013
Kolkman, D. (2020). The usefulness of algorithmic models in policymaking. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101488
Krishna, A., & Kim, S. (2020). Understanding President Trump supporters' behaviors about a political controversy. Journal of Communication Management, 24(2), 119-136. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-02-2020-0008
Lewis, C., & Marsh, D. (2012). Network Governance and Public Participation in Policy-Making: Federal Community Cabinets in Australia. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 71(1), 6-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2012.00753.x
Linfield, K. J., & Posavac, E. J. (2019). Program Evaluation:Methods and Cases Studies.
Malawani, A. D., Nurmandi, A., Purnomo, E. P., & Rahman, T. (2020). Social media in aid of post-disaster management. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 14(2), 237-260. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-09-2019-0088
Mekrungruengkul, S. (2012). Dynamics of the government decision-making process on the policy level towards Thai State-owned enterprises (SOEs). Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research, 4(5), 93-107. https://doi.org/10.5897/jpapr10.023
Melin, U., & Wihlborg, E. (2018). Balanced and integrated e-government implementation - exploring the crossroad of public policy-making and information systems project management processes. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 12(2), 191-208. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-12-2017-0080
Mergel, I., Gong, Y., & Bertot, J. (2018). Agile government: Systematic literature review and future research. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 291-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.04.003
Morden, M. (2016). Theorizing the resilience of the Indian Act. Canadian Public Administration, 59(1), 113-133. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12162
Pollard, J. E. (1951). The white house news conference as a channel of communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), 663-678. https://doi.org/10.1086/266352
Quayle, A., & Kelly, B. (2019). Building informal knowledge-sharing relationships between policymakers and academics: Insights from a PM&C engagement project. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 78(2), 311-318. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12341
Rice, L. L. (2019). Book Review: Presidential Communication and Character: White House News Management from Clinton and Cable to Twitter and Trump. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 24(2), 262-264. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218823173
Sharif, A. M., & Irani, Z. (2017). Policy making for global food security in a volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous (VUCA) world. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 11(4), 523-534. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-08-2017-0050
Siagian, R. C., Achadi, A., Thabrany, H., Ayuningtyas, D., Soewondo, P., Hastono, S. P., … Usia, T. (2020). A policy-making strategy to forecast outcomes of drug development in Indonesia. International Journal of Health Governance, 25(2), 137-149. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHG-12-2019-0083
Sivarajah, U., Weerakkody, V., Waller, P., Lee, H., Irani, Z., Choi, Y., … Glikman, Y. (2016). The role of e-participation and open data in evidence-based policy decision making in local government. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 26(1-2), 64-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2015.1125171
Swanstrom, T., Dreier, P., & Mollenkopf, J. (2008). Economic Inequality and Public Policy: The Power of Place. Cities and Society, (December), 284-302. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470752814.ch20
Tallberg, J., Sommerer, T., Squatrito, T., & Lundgren, M. (2016). The performance of international organizations: a policy output approach. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(7), 1077-1096. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1162834
Villalobos, J. D., Vaughn, J. S., & Cohen, D. B. (2014). Public management in political institutions: Explaining perceptions of white house chief of staff influence. Public Administration, 92(3), 744-760. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12097
Whitehead, M., Jones, R., & Pykett, J. (2011). Governing irrationality, or a more than rational government? reflections on the rescientisation of decision making in british public policy. Environment and Planning A, 43(12), 2819-2837. https://doi.org/10.1068/a43575
Simpul, R. (2017). Untuk mewujudkan Nawa cita harus ada perubahan paradigma dalam perencanaan pembangunan. Jakarta: usat Pembinaan, Pendidikan, dan Pelatihan Perencana (Pusbindiklatren) Bappenas.
Susanti, R. (2018, agustus selasa). https://regional.kompas.com/read/2018/10/08/09272951/4-tahun-pemerintahan-jokowi-kebijakan-polkam-dan-ekonomi-paling-disorot. Retrieved from https://regional.kompas.com/read/2018/10/08/09272951/4-tahun-pemerintahan-jokowi-kebijakan-polkam-dan-ekonomi-paling-disorot: https://regional.kompas.com/read/2018/10/08/09272951/4-tahun-pemerintahan-jokowi-kebijakan-polkam-dan-ekonomi-paling-disorot
Nicotera, L. L. (2009). Building theories of orgniazation the constituive role communication . New. York and London : Routhledge.
Dye, T. R. (2016). understanding public policy. florida state: pearson.
Azhari. (2011). Mereformasi birokrasi publik Indoensia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar Indonesia.
raharjo, a. w.-j. (2019). cerita dari sudut Istana kisah tentang peristiwa dan berita yang menghiasi panggung media. Jakarta : Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Stake, R. (2010). Qualitatif Reseach. New York: Guilford Publication.
Masduki, T. (2017, April ). kepala staf kepresidenan. (Simpul, Interviewer)
Masduki, T. (2017, April). Kepala staf kepresidenan. (simpul, Interviewer)
Masduki, T. (2017, April). Kepala Staf Kepresidenan. (SImpul, Interviewer)
torto.id. (2020, Mei 09). https://tirto.id/di-balik-keberhasilan-pembangunan-tol-trans-jawa-cMDt. Retrieved from https://tirto.id/di-balik-keberhasilan-pembangunan-tol-trans-jawa-cMDt: https://tirto.id/di-balik-keberhasilan-pembangunan-tol-trans-jawa-cMDt
Heriyanto, G. G. (2018). Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD.
(2015). In I. Presiden, Intruksi Presiden Nomor 9. Indonesia, Indonesia.
Kemenkue.go.id. (2020, Mei 09). https://www.kemenkeu.go.id/publikasi/siaran-pers-lama/presiden-jokowi-humas-pemerintah-harus-bergerak-cepat-dan-satu-narasi/. Retrieved from https://www.kemenkeu.go.id/publikasi/siaran-pers-lama/presiden-jokowi-humas-pemerintah-harus-bergerak-cepat-dan-satu-narasi/: https://www.kemenkeu.go.id/publikasi/siaran-pers-lama/presiden-jokowi-humas-pemerintah-harus-bergerak-cepat-dan-satu-narasi/
Instruksi Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 9 Tahun 2015 Tentang Pengelolahan Komunikasi Publik . (2015).
Djalal, A. (2015, Agustus 27). Tenaga Ahli Madya.
Sulistyo, E. (2019, September selasa). rapat. (Rita, Interviewer)
ksp.go.id. (2019).
Azhari. (2011). Mereformasi Birokrasi publik Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Eko, S. (2019). jalan kepemimpinan Jokowi : Jokoway. Jakarta: Moka Media.
(n.d.). Retrieved from ksp.go.id/penguatan-kelembagaan-kantor-staf-presiden.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/nyimak.v5i1.2873
Article Metrics
Abstract - 1165 PDF - 614Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Nyimak : Journal of Communication
Communication Science Study Program, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang.
Jl.Mayjen Sutoyo No.2 Kota Tangerang, West Java. Provinsi Banten 15111 Indonesia.
nyimak_journal@umt.ac.id
journalnyimak@gmail.com
Nyimak: Journal of Communication already indexed by:
Nyimak: Journal of Communication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.