Social Judgment Sabda and Dawuh Hamengkubuwono X Regarding the Appointment of the Crown Princess

Sigit Surahman, Ahmad Sihabudin, Fahrudin Faiz, Ridzki Rinanto Sigit

Abstract


This study aims to analyze the Sabda and Dawuh issued by Hamengkubuwono X, the monarch of the Yogyakarta Sultanate, regarding the appointment of the crown princess using the social judgment theory. A quantitative approach is employed to understand the community’s perceptions and actions towards these messages, exploring how the people of Yogyakarta interpret and respond to them by considering attitude perception, polarization, and acceptance latitude. This provides a deeper understanding of how these messages are received within the cultural and social context of Yogyakarta. The addition of Action to the Social Judgment Theory in researching Hamengkubuwono X ‘s Sabda and Dawuh regarding the appointment of the crown princess can involve examining the behavior or actions of the Yogyakarta community in response to the Sultan’s message. Over time, society realizes that Sabda and Dawuh can undergo shifts in their context. Social, cultural, and political changes that occur over time can influence the interpretation and application of Sabda and Dawuh from leaders or spiritual figures.

Keywords: Social judgment, sabda, dawuh, crown princess

ABSTRAK
Studi ini bertujuan menganalisis menggunakan social judgment theory terkait dengan Sabda dan Dawuh yang dikeluarkan oleh Hamengkubuwono X, Sultan di Kesultanan Yogyakarta, tentang pengangkatan puteri mahkota. Pendekatan kuantitatif digunakan dalam penelitian ini untuk memperoleh pemahaman yang menyeluruh tentang persepsi dan tindakan masyarakat terhadap Sabda dan Dawuh. Terlihat bagaimana masyarakat Yogyakarta menafsirkan dan menyikapi Sabda dan Dawuh Sultan tentang pengangkatan puteri mahkota dengan mempertimbangkan persepsi sikap, polaritas sikap dan zona akseptansi. Hal ini dapat memberikan pemahaman yang lebih kaya tentang bagaimana pesan-pesan tersebut dipahami dan diterima dalam konteks budaya dan sosial masyarakat Yogyakarta. Jika action ditambahkan ke dalam Social Judgment Theory sebagai kebaruan dalam penelitian sabda dan dawuh Hamengkubuwono X tentang pengangkatan puteri mahkota, maka dapat melibatkan aspek perilaku atau tindakan yang dilakukan oleh masyarakat Yogyakarta sebagai respons terhadap pesan Sultan. Seiring perkembangan zaman, masyarakat menyadari bahwa Sabda dan Dawuh dapat mengalami pergeseran dalam konteksnya. Perubahan sosial, budaya, dan politik yang terjadi seiring waktu dapat mempengaruhi interpretasi dan penerapan sabda dan dawuh dari pemimpin atau tokoh spiritual.

Kata Kunci: Penilaian, sabda, dawuh, puteri mahkota


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abele, A. (2022). Agency and communion as fundamental dimensions of social judgment – and Bogdan Wojciszke’s brilliant idea on perspective. PsychOpen GOLD, 8157.

Anglin, A. H., Courtney, C., & Allison, T. H. (2021). Venturing for Others, Subject to Role Expectations? A Role Congruity Theory Approach to Social Venture Crowd Funding. SageJournal, 46(2), 225-228.

Chau, H. F. (2014). Social Judgment Theory Based Model On Opinion Formation, Polarization And Evolution. Journal Physica, 1(1), 133-140.

Collins, P. H., Silva, E. C., & Ergun, E. (2021). Intersectionality as Critical Social Theory. 2021: Duke University Press.

Darity, W. (2008). Social judgment theory. In P. A. O’Keefe, International encyclopedia of the social sciences (p. 17). USA: Macmillan Reference.

Davis, J. L., Love, T. P., & Fares, P. (2019). Collective Social Identity: Synthesizing Identity Theory and Social Identity Theory Using Digital Data. SageJournal, 28(3), 231-253.

Ding, Z., Liu, Y., Guo, Y., Jiang, Y., & Chen, Z. (2018). An Evolution Model of Group Opinions Based on Social Judgment Theory. IEEE, 69288 - 69293.

Hardy, & Clegg. (1996). Some Dare Call it Power. London: The SAGE Handbook of Organization Studies.

Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss, K. A. (2005). Teori Komunikasi; Theories of Human Communication Edisi 9. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.

Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss., K. A. (2011). Teori Komunikasi; Theories of Human Communication Edisi 9. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.

Miller, K. (2005). Communicaion Theories: Perspectives, Processes, and Contexts second edtion. North America: McGraw-Hill Companies.

Oehmke, M., & Opp, M. M. (2023). A Theory of Socially Responsible Investment. Swedish House of Finance Research Paper, 20(2).

Oversveen, E. (2022). Capitalism and alienation: Towards a Marxist theory of alienation for the 21st century. European Journal of Social Theory, 25(3), 440-457.

Salazar, L. R. (2017). Changing resistant audience attitudes using social judgment theory’s “ anchor “ point perspectives. Communication Teacher, 1-6.

Sangaramoorthy, T., & Benton, A. (2021). Intersectionality and syndemics: A commentary. National Library of Medicine, 336-420.

Sarup. (1991). Social Judgment and Intergroup Relations Essays in Honor of Muzafer Sherif. New York Berlin Heidelberg London Paris Tokyo Hong Kong Barcelona Budapest: Springer-Verlag.

Shakya, R. (2014). The Social Judgment Theory Consumer Behavior. Journal EMBA, 3(2), 135-145.

Sherstha, R. K., & Shakya, R. (2014). The Social Judgment Theory Consumer Behavior. KATHMANDU UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT, 1-5.

Sherif, C. W. (1965). Attitude and Attitude Change: The Social Judgment-Involvement Approach. Philadelphia: Saunders.

Smith, S. W., Atkin, C. K., & Martell, D. P. (2006). A Social Judgment Theory Approach to Conducting Formative Research in a Social Norms Campaign. Communication Theory, 16(1), 141-152.

Sounder, Lewis, & Thornhill, &. (2019). Research methods for business students. New York: Pearson.

Surahman, S., Sihabudin, A., Faiz, F., & Sigit, R. R. (2023). Sabda And Dawuh Hamengkubuwono X Abouth THheCrown Princess Max Weber’s Studies Power, Authority, Legitimacy. International Journal of Social Science, 3(2), 143-152.

Surahman, S. (2017). Bingkai Media pada Program Acara televisi Satu Indonesia Net.Tv Episode Sultan HBX dan Asia Calling Tempo TV Episode penerus Takhta Raja Yogyakarta. Nyimak Journal of Communication, 1(2), 171-187.

Thai, S., & Lockwood, P. (2022). Social-Judgment Comparisons in Daily Life. Sage Journal, 82-92.

Unsworth, Harries, & Davies. (2015). Using Social Judgment Theory method to examine how experienced occupational therapy driver assessors use information to make fitness-to-drive recommendations. National Library of Medicine, 109-120.

Victoria, B., & Drigas, A. (2022). ToM & ASD: The interconnection of Theory of Mind with the social-emotional, cognitive development of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. The use of ICTs as an alternative form of intervention in ASD. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 33(1), 42-72.

Wiltshire, T. J., Snow, S. L., & Fiore, S. M. (2014). Leveraging Social Judgment Theory to Examine the Relationship between Social Cues and Signals in Human-Robot Interactions. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 1336 - 1346.

Wigton, R. S. (1996). Social judgement theory and medical judgement. Philpapers, 2(3), 175-190.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/nyimak.v8i1.9240

Article Metrics

Abstract - 104 PDF - 43

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Nyimak : Journal of Communication

Communication Science Study Program, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang.

Jl.Mayjen Sutoyo No.2 Kota Tangerang, West Java. Provinsi Banten 15111 Indonesia.

nyimak_journal@umt.ac.id

journalnyimak@gmail.com

Nyimak: Journal of Communication already indexed by:

google   One_search   dimention   Garuda base    crossref   Scilit1 index-copernicus 

Nyimak: Journal of Communication is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

View My Stats