Interpreting Meaning in Social Criticism through Murals in Indonesia

Rizaldi Parani, Samuel Aditya Darmawan, Herman Purba

Abstract


Murals, as a form of street art, are increasingly used not only to enhance urban aesthetics but also to convey social criticism. In Indonesia, this trend has gained momentum, particularly during the Covid-19 pandemic, when murals have become a medium for dissent against government policies, figures, and institutions. This study aims to analyze how artists use murals to express social criticism towards the government and to understand the interpretative process involved in their message delivery. Utilizing Social Construction theory, this research examines how artists construct and convey their messages through murals. The study adopts a qualitative approach with a phenomenological method, focusing on the lived experiences of the artists to gain insights into how they perceive and represent social realities. The findings reveal that mural creation is a subjective process, deeply influenced by the artists' understanding of social issues. Artists navigate through various stages of construction, incorporating words, symbols, and images to reflect their perspectives on societal concerns. The messages embedded in these murals are often open to multiple interpretations, reflecting the diverse ways in which social criticism can be communicated. This study highlights the role of murals as a dynamic form of protest and expression, revealing the complex interplay between artistic representation and social critique. The research underscores the importance of considering artists' experiences and perspectives to fully appreciate the impact and significance of their work in the context of social and political commentary.

Keywords: Social construction, meaning, interpretation, mural, social criticism

 

ABSTRAK

Mural, sebagai bentuk seni jalanan, semakin digunakan tidak hanya untuk meningkatkan estetika perkotaan tetapi juga untuk menyampaikan kritik sosial. Di Indonesia, tren ini semakin berkembang, terutama selama pandemi Covid-19, ketika mural menjadi media untuk mengekspresikan ketidakpuasan terhadap kebijakan pemerintah, tokoh, dan institusi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bagaimana seniman menggunakan mural untuk menyampaikan kritik sosial terhadap pemerintah dan untuk memahami proses interpretasi yang terlibat dalam penyampaian pesan mereka. Menggunakan teori Konstruksi Sosial, penelitian ini memeriksa bagaimana seniman membangun dan menyampaikan pesan mereka melalui mural. Studi ini mengadopsi pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode fenomenologis, berfokus pada pengalaman hidup para seniman untuk mendapatkan wawasan tentang bagaimana mereka memandang dan merepresentasikan realitas sosial. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penciptaan mural adalah proses subjektif, yang sangat dipengaruhi oleh pemahaman seniman terhadap isu-isu sosial. Seniman melewati berbagai tahap konstruksi, menggabungkan kata-kata, simbol, dan gambar untuk mencerminkan perspektif mereka tentang masalah-masalah masyarakat. Pesan yang tertanam dalam mural ini sering kali terbuka untuk berbagai interpretasi, mencerminkan cara-cara beragam dalam menyampaikan kritik sosial. Penelitian ini menyoroti peran mural sebagai bentuk protes dan ekspresi yang dinamis, mengungkapkan hubungan kompleks antara representasi artistik dan kritik sosial. Penelitian ini menekankan pentingnya mempertimbangkan pengalaman dan perspektif seniman untuk sepenuhnya menghargai dampak dan signifikansi karya mereka dalam konteks komentar sosial dan politik.

Kata Kunci: Konstruksi sosial, makna, interpretasi, mural, kritik sosial


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abar, A. Z. (1999). Kritik sosial, pers, politik indonesia dalam kritik sosial dalam wacana pembangunan. Yogyakarta: UII Press.

Amindoni, A. (2020). Virus Corona: Presiden Jokowi Pilih ‘Pembatasan Sosial dalam Skala Besar’, Warga Mulai Sortir Pendatang. BBC Indonesia. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-52059236

Andhita, P. R. (2021). Komunikasi visual (1st ed.). Banyumas: Zahira Media.

Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik (6th ed.). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Badri, M. (2022). Komunikasi Inovasi dalam Adaptasi Kebiasaan Baru: Studi Deskriptif pada Pelaku Usaha di Provinsi Riau. Jurnal Komunikasi Pembangunan, 20 (1). 1-13. https://doi.org/10.46937/20202238001

Barry, A. K. (1997). English grammars: language as human behaviour. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Beebe, S. A., Beebe, S. J., Ivy, D. K. (2010). Communication principal for a lifetime. Boston: Ally& Bacon Publishing

Berger, P. L. & Luckmann, T. (1991). The social construction of reality. London: Penguin Books.

Boghossian, P. (2001). What is social construction? in Times Literary Supplement. 6-8.

Cojocaru, S. & Bragaru, C. (2012). The role of language in constructing social realities. The Appreciative Inquiry and the reconstruction of organisational ideology. Revista De Cercetare Si Interventie Sociala. 36. 31-43.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). California: Sage Publications.

Fitriani, L., Pawito, P., Utari, P. (2021). The analysis of the hashtag #Jokowi404NotFound on Twitter in protesting mural removal in the public sphere. Informasi, 51 (2). 281-304. http://doi.org/10.21831/informasi.v51i2.45068. 281-304

Galbin, A. (2014). An introduction to social constructionism. Social Research Reports. 26. 82-92.

Garjito, D. (2021, Agustus 15). 7 Fakta Mural Jokowi:404 Not Found. Disoal Mensesneg hingga Pemural Diburu Polisi. Suara.com. https://www.suara.com/news/2021/08/15/113138/7-fakta-mural-jokowi-404-not-found-disoal-mensesneg-hingga-pemural-diburu-polisi

Given, L. M. (editor). (2008). The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Greaney, M. E. (2002). The power of the urban canvas: paints, politics, and mural art policy. New England Journal of Public Policy. 18-1 (6). 8-48.

Karman. (2015). Konstruksi realitas sosial sebagai gerakan pemikiran (sebuah telaah teoritis terhadap konstruksi realitas Peter L. Berger). Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Komunikasi dan Informatika. 5 (3). 11-23.

Lester, P. M. (1995). Visual communication: image with a message. California: Wadsworth Publishing.

Lichtman, M. (2013). Qualitative Research in Education. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Luthfi, A. H. (2020). Analisis Semiotika Kritik Sosial dalam Balutan Humorpada Komik Faktap. Jurnal ILMU KOMUNIKASI. 17 (1). 19-40. https://doi.org/10.24002/jik.v17i1.1968

Malik, N. (2022). Covid-19 governance in indonesia: a systematic literature review. Logos: Journal of Local Government Issues, 5 (2). 145-160. https://doi.org/10.22219/logos.v5i2.22321

Masnah. (2020). Konsep diri artis street art dalam menghasilkan mural kritik sosial di jakarta. Populis: Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora. 5(1).82-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.47313/pjsh.v5i1.831

Mulyana, D. (2010). Ilmu Komunikasi, Suatu Pengantar. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya

Nurita, D. (2021, Juli 2). Gonta-ganti istilah dari PSBB, PPKM Mikro, PPKM darurat, apa bedanya. Tempo.co. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1478808/gonta-ganti-istilah-dari-psbb-ppkm-mikro-ppkm-darurat-apa-bedanya

Oksinata, H. (2010). Kritik sosial dalam kumpulan puisi Aku Ingin Jadi Peluru karya Wiji Thukul: Kajian Resepsi Sastra. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas maret

Persada, G. (2021, Agustus 16). Kemnaker: Hingga Awal Agustus 2021, 538.305 Pekerja di PHK. Kompas.com. https://www.kompas.tv/article/201987/kemnaker-hingga-awal-agustus-2021-538-305-pekerja-di-phk

Prasiasa, D. P. O. (2022). Mural art as a media for social criticism: perspective structuralist-constructivism. Mudra Jurnal Seni Budaya. 37 (2). 203-211. https://doi.org/10.31091/mudra.v37i2.1985

Roziqin, A., Mas’udi, S.Y.F., & Sihidi, I.T. (2021). An analysis of Indonesian government policies against COVID-19. Public Administration and Policy: An Asia-Pacific Journal, 24 (1). 92-107. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAP-08-2020-0039

Smith, J. A., Flowers, P. & Larkin, M. Interpretative phenomenological analysis: theory, method and research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Speed, B. (1991). Reality exists O.K.? an argument against constructivism and socialconstructionism. Journal of Family Therapy. 13(4). 395–409

Wood, J. T. (2013). Communication mosaics: an introduction to the field of communication. Boston: Cengage Learning.

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/nyimak.v7i2.8190

Article Metrics

Abstract - 490 PDF - 425

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Nyimak : Journal of Communication

Communication Science Study Program, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang.

Jl.Mayjen Sutoyo No.2 Kota Tangerang, West Java. Provinsi Banten 15111 Indonesia.

nyimak_journal@umt.ac.id

journalnyimak@gmail.com

Nyimak: Journal of Communication already indexed by:

google   One_search   dimention   Garuda base    crossref   Scilit1 index-copernicus 

Nyimak: Journal of Communication is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

View My Stats