Accommodation Strategies IN Cross-cultural Communication of Rohingya Ethnicity in Interacting with The Community of Pekanbaru City
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31000/nyimak.v10i1.15020Abstrak
Pekanbaru City has become one of the destinations for asylum seekers, including members of the Rohingya ethnic group who have experienced forced migration from Myanmar. This study aims to examine the strategies of convergence, divergence, and the phenomenon of over-accommodation in communication interactions between Rohingya refugees and the local community. The research employs a qualitative method using a symbolic interaction approach. The findings reveal that the communication accommodation practices of the Rohingya refugees are dynamic, reflecting both efforts to adapt to the host community and attempts to maintain their cultural identity. Convergence strategies are demonstrated through the use of the Indonesian language, open nonverbal communication, and cultural adjustments such as shared religious practices with the local population. In contrast, divergence strategies are reflected in the continued use of the Rohingya language among fellow refugees, the tendency to withdraw from conversations they do not fully understand, and the preservation of traditional dietary habits, clothing styles, and social roles. Furthermore, the phenomenon of over-accommodation appears in the form of reliance on refugees who are more proficient in Indonesian to act as communication intermediaries, which may limit opportunities for independent adaptation. These findings highlight that the communication accommodation process among Rohingya refugees in Pekanbaru is complex and shaped by the simultaneous need for social integration and cultural preservation.
Keywords: Communication accommodation, Rohingya, refugees
Â
ABSTRAK
Pekanbaru merupakan salah satu wilayah tujuan bagi imigran pencari suaka, termasuk Etnis Rohingya yang mengalami migrasi paksa dari Myanmar. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis strategi konvergensi, divergensi, serta fenomena akomodasi berlebihan dalam interaksi komunikasi antara pengungsi Rohingya dan masyarakat lokal. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan interaksi simbolik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa akomodasi komunikasi Etnis Rohingya bersifat dinamis, yang mencerminkan upaya adaptasi sekaligus pelestarian identitas budaya mereka. Strategi konvergensi terlihat melalui penggunaan Bahasa Indonesia, komunikasi nonverbal yang terbuka, serta penyesuaian budaya seperti praktik keagamaan yang serupa dengan masyarakat setempat. Sementara itu, strategi divergensi tampak pada penggunaan Bahasa Rohingya di antara sesama pengungsi, kecenderungan menarik diri dari percakapan yang tidak dipahami, serta pelestarian kebiasaan makan, gaya berpakaian, dan peran sosial tradisional. Selain itu, fenomena akomodasi berlebihan muncul dalam bentuk ketergantungan pada pengungsi yang lebih fasih berbahasa Indonesia sebagai perantara komunikasi, yang berpotensi menghambat proses adaptasi mandiri. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa proses akomodasi komunikasi pengungsi Rohingya di Pekanbaru berlangsung secara kompleks dan dipengaruhi oleh kebutuhan adaptasi sekaligus upaya mempertahankan identitas budaya.
Kata Kunci: Akomodasi komunikasi, Rohingya, pengungsi
Referensi
Alwi, S., Siregar, Z. A. B., Iqbal, M., & Fithra, H. (2024). Community Psychology and the Acceptance of Rohingya Refugees in Aceh: Local Identity, Humanitarian Needs, and Islamic Law. Hikmatuna Journal for Integrative Islamic Studies, 10(1), 15–27.
Berliano, R., & Fajri, C. (2025). Interpersonal Communication Strategy and Cultural Adaptation in Sriwijaya Dormitory. Golden Ratio of Social Science and Education, 5(2), 481–491.
Berry, J. W. (2005a). Acculturation: Living successfully in two cultures. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29(6), 697–712.
Berry, J. W. (2005b). Acculturation: Living successfully in two cultures. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29(6), 697–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.07.013
Bhattacharjee, M. (2024). Statelessness of an ethnic minority: the case of Rohingya. Frontiers in Political Science, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2024.1144493
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brunner, M.-L. (2021). Understanding intercultural communication. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Castles, S., de Haas, H., & Miller, M. J. (2014). The age of migration: International population movements in the modern world. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-40869-7
Docquier, F., & Rapoport, H. (2012). Globalization, brain drain, and development. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(3), 681–730.
Douglas, P., Cetron, M., & Spiegel, P. (2019). Definitions matter: migrants, immigrants, asylum seekers and refugees. In Journal of travel medicine (Vol. 26, Number 2, p. taz005). Oxford University Press.
Dragojevic, M., Gasiorek, J., & Giles, H. (2015). Communication accommodation theory. In The International Encyclopedia of Interpersonal Communication. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118540190.wbeic006
Farid, A. S., & Hakimi, M. (2025). Intercultural communication strategies for sustainable conflict resolution in Indonesia. KOMUNIKE: Jurnal Komunikasi Penyiaran Islam, 17(1), 1–28.
Giles, H., & Watson, B. (2013). The social meanings of language, dialect and accent. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 17(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12011
Gudykunst, W. B. (2005). Theorizing about intercultural communication. Sage.
Irwansyah, I., Al’asyari, A., & Muary, R. (2021). ROHINGYA REFUGEES IN INDONESIA: THE DYNAMICS OF STATELESSNESS AND THE VIEWS OF LOCAL PEOPLE. JUPIIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 13(2), 341–350. https://doi.org/10.24114/jupiis.v13i2.28340
Karim, Z. P., & Zakia, R. (2025). Creating imaginary enemies: The rejection of Rohingya refugees in Aceh. Jurnal HAM, 16(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2025.16.77-94
Kim, Y. Y. (2001). Becoming intercultural: An integrative theory of communication and cross-cultural adaptation. Routledge.
Kok, P. (1999). The definition of migration and its application: Making sense of recent South African census and survey data. Southern African Journal of Demography, 7(1), 19–30.
Mulyana, D., & Solatun. (2016). Metode Penelitian Komunikasi. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mulyana, Deddy. (2021). Ilmu Komunikasi Suatu Pengantar. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Munir, R. (2000). Dasar-dasar Demografi. Lembaga Penerbit UI.
Oetzel, J. G., & Ting-Toomey, S. (2006). The Sage handbook of conflict communication: Integrating theory, research, and practice. Sage Publications.
Olivia, Y., Nizmi, Y. E., Jamaan, A., Saeri, M., Iskandar, I., & Deanty, H. S. (2021). Considering Local Integration for Refugees in Indonesia. Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, 9(2), ?-? https://doi.org/10.18196/hi.v9i2.10113
Piller, I. (2017). Intercultural communication: A critical introduction. Edinburgh University Press.
Rahman, M. M., Dutta, M. J., & Elers, P. (2025). Living through food rations: A culture-centered study with Rohingya refugees. International Journal of Communication, 19.
Rathnapala, J., & Chongyue, L. (n.d.). Negotiating Identity in Intercultural Communication: Experiences of South Asian Students in Chinese Higher Education.
Saputra, A., Zulkarnain, I., & Kurniawati, D. (2023). Interaksi komunikasi dan konsep diri pengungsi etnis Rohingya di Kota Medan. Perspektif, 12(1), 298–308. https://doi.org/10.31289/perspektif.v12i1.8596
Sarmin, A. (2020). Ongoing Persecution of the Rohingya: A History of Periodic Ethnic Cleansings and Genocides. Intellectual Discourse, 28(2), 675–696.
Siregar, N. M. (2018). Komunikasi Antarbudaya Etnis Rohingya Dalam Upaya Eksistensi Diri di Kota Medan. Jurnal Interaksi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 2(2), 190–201.
Skeldon, R. (2014). Migration and development: A global perspective. Routledge.
Tsegay, S. M. (2023). International migration: Definition, causes and effects. Genealogy, 7(3), 61.
Ward, C., & Geeraert, N. (2016). Advancing acculturation theory and research: The acculturation process in its ecological context. Current Opinion in Psychology, 8, 98–104.
Yasir. (2024). Memahami Teori Komunikasi Sudut Pandang Tradisi dan Konteks Penulis. Deepublish.
Yunita, K., Setyari, E. P., & Safitri, F. (2022). Cultural identity negotiation as a form of conflict management: A study of intercultural communication strategies in Batak-Chinese marriage. Int J Multicultural Multireligious Underst, 9(1), 717–723.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Nyimak: Journal of Communication. Communication Science Study Program, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang, Indonesia as the publisher of the journal. Nyimak: Journal of Communication right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in Nyimak: Journal of Communication. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).