Journal of Government and Civil Society

Articles

Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): Journal of Government and Civil Society (October)

Reform and Reformulation of Public Policy in Indonesia: What is required?

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31000/jgcs.v8i2.12361
Submitted
25 August 2024
Published
6 November 2024

Abstract

Public policy reform in Indonesia has emerged as a critical area of study over the past few decades, necessitating a comprehensive examination of its underlying instruments and models. This research aims to identify essential components and develop strategic frameworks for the effective reform and reformulation of public policy within the Indonesian government. Through an extensive thematic analysis of previous policy reforms, this study highlights recurring themes and successful patterns that inform best practices. Findings underscore the urgent need for reforms in the public service and agribusiness sectors, as well as the broader governance framework, to enhance policy effectiveness and societal outcomes. While political stability remains a vital prerequisite for successful public policy implementation, it is insufficient in isolation. The integration of Multi-Level Governance (MLG), active stakeholder engagement in policy development, and the incorporation of technological advancements are pivotal for facilitating meaningful reforms. Furthermore, political and governance reforms are essential to address emerging challenges. The adoption of data and system analytics within government agencies has shown promise in enhancing policy initiatives; however, it raises critical concerns about privacy and accountability. In the context of Indonesia's dynamic and diverse landscape, this research advocates for a strategic dissemination of substantial data to various stakeholders to foster informed decision-making and effective public policy reform.

 

Reformasi kebijakan publik di Indonesia telah muncul sebagai area studi yang kritis selama beberapa dekade terakhir, yang memerlukan pemeriksaan menyeluruh terhadap instrumen dan model yang mendasarinya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi komponen penting dan mengembangkan kerangka strategis untuk reformasi dan reformulasi kebijakan publik yang efektif dalam pemerintahan Indonesia. Melalui analisis tematik yang komprehensif terhadap reformasi kebijakan sebelumnya, penelitian ini menyoroti tema-tema yang berulang dan pola sukses yang dapat menginformasikan praktik terbaik. Temuan menunjukkan kebutuhan mendesak akan reformasi di sektor pelayanan publik dan agribisnis, serta kerangka tata kelola yang lebih luas, untuk meningkatkan efektivitas kebijakan dan hasil sosial. Meskipun stabilitas politik tetap menjadi prasyarat vital untuk pelaksanaan kebijakan publik yang sukses, hal ini tidak cukup jika berdiri sendiri. Integrasi Multi Level Governance (MLG), keterlibatan aktif pemangku kepentingan dalam pengembangan kebijakan, dan penggabungan kemajuan teknologi merupakan hal yang penting untuk memfasilitasi reformasi yang bermakna. Selain itu, reformasi politik dan tata kelola diperlukan untuk mengatasi tantangan yang muncul. Adopsi data dan analitik sistem dalam lembaga pemerintah menunjukkan janji dalam meningkatkan inisiatif kebijakan; namun, ini menimbulkan kekhawatiran kritis mengenai privasi dan akuntabilitas. Dalam konteks lanskap Indonesia yang dinamis dan beragam, penelitian ini menganjurkan untuk penyebaran data substansial secara strategis kepada berbagai pemangku kepentingan guna mendorong pengambilan keputusan yang terinformasi dan reformasi kebijakan publik yang efektif.

References

  1. Adesoji, A., & Rotimi, O. (2009). Nigeria and its Anti-Corruption War: The Cases of Dariye and Alamieyeseigha. Africa Insight, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.4314/ai.v38i1.22539
  2. Ahlers, A. L., & Schubert, G. (2014). Effective Policy Implementation in China’s Local State. Modern China, 41(4), 372–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0097700413519563
  3. Ahrens, J. (2002). Governance And The Implementation Of Technology Policy In Less Developed Countries. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 11(4–5), 441–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590200000008
  4. Akib, H. (2012). Implementasi Kebijakan: Apa, Mengapa dan Bagaimana. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.26858/jiap.v1i1.289
  5. Alfin, A., Bustamar, B., & Rosman, E. (2019). Politik Hukum Pidana Indonesia: Analisis Korelasi Siyasah Syar’iyah dan Pencegahan Korupsi. Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 13(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v0i1.1797
  6. Alunaza, H., Maulana, I., & Sudagung, A. D. (2018). The Pacific Solution as Australia Policy towards Asylum Seeker and Irregular Maritime Arrivals (IMAs) in John Howard Era. Jurnal Ilmiah Hubungan Internasional, 14(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.26593/jihi.v14i1.2789.61-75
  7. Andriyana, A., & Jowono, V. (2022). MULTI-LEVEL GOVERNANCE IN PUBLIC POLICY IN INDONESIA. Sosio Informa, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.33007/inf.v7i3.2663
  8. Anggono, B. D., & Wahanisa, R. (2022). Corruption Prevention in Legislative Drafting in Indonesia. WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT, 18, 172–181. https://doi.org/10.37394/232015.2022.18.19
  9. Anindito, N. (2018). Perkembangan Reformasi Birokrasi Organisasi Publik dan Partisipasi Publik. Jurnal Good Governance, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.32834/gg.v13i2.33
  10. Angkasah, L., Adolf, H., & Wibowo, G. D. H. (2017). Bureaucratic Reform in the Perspective of State Administration Law. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 8(5–1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.2478/mjss-2018-0094
  11. Arango, H., Deccache, É., Cintra Pereira, L., Arango, L. G., Donizeti Bonatto, B., Benso Maciel, L. D. S., Cortez, C., & Ferreira Da Costa, V. B. (2022). Economics, Regulatory Aspects, and Public Policies (pp. 131–172). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88016-3_8
  12. Arnold, G. (2014). Policy learning and science policy innovation adoption by street-level bureaucrats. Journal of Public Policy, 34(3), 389–414. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x14000154
  13. Astuti, D. A. L., Suprehatin, S., & Winoto, J. (2023). The Effect of Corruption Prevention Efforts with Regional Corruption Cases and Complaints. Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science, 2(10), 3259–3272. https://doi.org/10.55324/ijoms.v2i10.573
  14. Ayu Astuti, A. (2022). An Analysis of Indonesian Public Service Reform Through National Public Service Complaint Management Policy. Journal of Public Policy and Administration, 6(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20220601.12
  15. Béland, D., & Lecours, A. (2005). Nationalism, Public Policy, and Institutional Development: Social Security in Belgium. Journal of Public Policy, 25(2), 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x05000309
  16. Boban, M., & Klaric, M. (2021). Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic on Digital Transformation of Public Administration in European Union. 1312–1317. https://doi.org/10.23919/mipro52101.2021.9596678
  17. Cassell, M. (2007). Internationalizing Public Policy Courses. PS: Political Science & Politics, 40(1), 106–108. https://doi.org/10.1017/s104909650722027x
  18. Chukwudi, O., Fabian, Paul-Chima, U. O., & Uganda, D. (2024). The Impact of Telemedicine on Healthcare Delivery during and after the COVID-19 Pandemic: Opportunities, Innovations, Challenges, and Policy Implications. NEWPORT INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND PHARMACY, 5(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.59298/nijpp/2024/51394818
  19. Coleman, H. J. (2009). Translating Canadian Models: International Partnerships and Public Policy Reform in Russia. Canadian Slavonic Papers, 51(1), 25–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00085006.2009.11092601
  20. Crowley, G. R., & Beaulier, S. (2014). Public-Sector Unions and Government Policy: The Effects of Political Contributions and Collective Bargaining Rights. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3191362
  21. Daffana, A. R. (2024). Harmonizing Pancasila with Noble Technological Values amidst Digitalization. Journal of Digital Law and Policy, 3(2), 110–118. https://doi.org/10.58982/jdlp.v3i2.571
  22. Darmawan, A. (2016). LEGAL POLICY OF INVESTMENT GOVERNMENT REFORM IN INDONESIA. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2016.16.2.564
  23. De La Porte, C., Tranøy, B. S., Kauko, J., Eydal, G. B., ’T Hart, P., & Nohrstedt, D. (2022). Successful Public Policy in the Nordic Countries. Oxford University pressoxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192856296.001.0001
  24. Desai, V. (2014). 8 The role of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) (pp. 590–594). routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203528983-122
  25. Dollery, B. E., & Drew, J. J. (2017). Chalk and Cheese: A Comparative Analysis of Local Government Reform Processes in New South Wales and Victoria. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(11), 847–858. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1298609
  26. Dupuits, E. (2017). From Multi-level Governance to Scalar Politics: Water Community Networks Challenging Neo-Extractivist Governmental Institutions in Ecuador (pp. 97–121). palgrave macmillan uk. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60086-8_5
  27. Eka, I. W. A. (2019). THE IMPACT OF THE INDONESIAN TAX ADMINISTRATION REFORM ON TAX COMPLIANCE AND TAX REVENUE. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 27(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.14203/jep.27.1.2019.1-24
  28. Fauzi, E. A., & Setiawan, A. (2019). Accountability Jogya Smart Service Application in Public Sector Services in Yogyakarta 2019. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3528951
  29. Fitria, Y., Novaria, R., & Rudy Handoko, V. (2023). The Existence of Integrated Service Units in Improving Management and Public Services Quality at Universities in Indonesia. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i17.14176
  30. Hajer, J., & Chen, B. (2024). New public management marketizers versus Neo-Weberian state modernizers? Institutional configurations of social impact bond utilization among 18 OECD countries. Public Management Review, 26(9), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2024.2369789
  31. Hardiyansyah, H., & Effendi, R. (2014). Model Implementasi Kebijakan Publik dalam Pengelolaan Sampah dan Kebersihan Kota Palembang. MIMBAR, Jurnal Sosial Dan Pembangunan, 30(1), 108. https://doi.org/10.29313/mimbar.v30i1.572
  32. Harvey, N., & Clarke, B. (2019). 21st Century reform in Australian coastal policy and legislation. Marine Policy, 103, 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.02.016
  33. Hee, C., & Hirasawa, R. (1998). Changes in Japanese Government policies to be a front-runner in science and technology. Science and Public Policy, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/spp/25.1.47
  34. Hendri Wijaya, J. (2023). E-Government in Indonesia: Policy Review and Implementation of Jokowi’s Government. TheJournalish: Social and Government, 4(3), 302–309. https://doi.org/10.55314/tsg.v4i3.563
  35. Hollander, R. (2008). John Howard, Economic Liberalism, Social Conservatism, and Australian Federalism. Australian Journal of Politics & History, 54(1), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8497.2008.00486.x
  36. Ibrahim, R. A., Azahra, A. S., & Sidiq, F. (2023). Bureaucratic Reform and Clean Governance: Efforts Towards Social Justice and Sustainable Economic Growth in Indonesia. International Journal of Humanities, Law, and Politics, 1(3), 49–53. https://doi.org/10.46336/ijhlp.v1i3.33
  37. Jannah, R., Firmansyah, M., & Handajani, L. (2018). The Influence of Human Resources, Use of Information Technology and Public Participation to the Transparency and Accountability of Village Financial Management. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 6(5). https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v6i5.em03
  38. Jukneviciene, V. (2019). Key Factors for the Successful Implementation of the National Innovation Policy: The Case of Lithuania. Annals of Spiru Haret University. Economic Series, 19(2), 25–50. https://doi.org/10.26458/1921
  39. Kamaruddin, K., & Agung Afandi, S. (2024). Anti-corruption Policy Analysis: Indonesian Open Government Study. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i7.15531
  40. Kochanova, A., Hasnain, Z., & Larson, B. (2018). Does E-Government Improve Government Capacity? Evidence from Tax Compliance Costs, Tax Revenue, and Public Procurement Competitiveness. The World Bank Economic Review, 34(1), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhx024
  41. Kütting, G., & Cerny, P. G. (2015). RETHINKING GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY: FROM GLOBAL GOVERNANCE TO TRANSNATIONAL NEOPLURALISM. Public Administration, 93(4), 907–921. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12189
  42. Labib, F., & Adi Lila, S. (2023). The Influence of Political Stability on Indonesia’s Gross Domestic Product. ASIAN Economic and Business Development, 6(1), 31–35. https://doi.org/10.54204/aebd/vol6no1august2023004
  43. Lasaksi, P. (2024). Government Policy and Agribusiness Development in Indonesia. West Science Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(05), 1171–1182. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsis.v2i05.941
  44. Lassa, J. A. (2013). Disaster Policy Change in Indonesia 1930–2010: From Government to Governance? International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters, 31(2), 130–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/028072701303100202
  45. Leightley, D., Sharp, M., Williamson, V., Gribble, R., & Fear, N. T. (2020). Sentiment of Armed Forces Social Media Accounts in the United Kingdom: An Initial Analysis of Twitter Content (pp. 145–166). springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47511-6_9
  46. Letter, E. (2023). Antiviral drugs for influenza for 2023-2024. The Medical Letter on Drugs and Therapeutics, 65(1689), 177–182. https://doi.org/10.58347/tml.2023.1689a
  47. Manjali, R. (2023). Mission-Oriented Innovation Policy: E-Government Development Trajectory in Indonesia’s Bureaucratic Reform. Jejaring Administrasi Publik, 15(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.20473/jap.v15i1.47139
  48. Mardiyanta, A. (2013). Restore Public Trust Through Deliberative Public Policy Formulation. Bisnis & Birokrasi Journal, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.20476/jbb.v20i1.1861
  49. Marquardt, J. (2014). A Struggle of Multi-level Governance: Promoting Renewable Energy in Indonesia. Energy Procedia, 58, 87–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.10.413
  50. Mittal, P. (2020). Impact of Digital Capabilities and Technology Skills on Effectiveness of Government in Public Services. https://doi.org/10.1109/icdabi51230.2020.9325647
  51. Nepomnyashchyy, O. (2022). The Public Policy Implementation Mechanisms in the Context of Digitalization. Economic Affairs, 67(4s). https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.4s.2022.12
  52. Papaioannou, K. (2018). THE INTERACTION OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY AND CULTURAL POLICY IN AN INTERNATIONAL ANTAGONISTIC ENVIRONMENT. IJASOS- International E-Journal of Advances in Social Sciences, 4(11), 507–509. https://doi.org/10.18769/ijasos.455680
  53. Pradana, G. A. (2016). Diskresi dalam Implementasi Kebijakan Publik (Studi pada Implementasi Kebijakan BPJS-Kesehatan di Puskesmas Kepanjen). Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik, 2(3), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiap.2016.002.03.11
  54. Pal, L. A., & Ireland, D. (2009). The Public Sector Reform Movement: Mapping the Global Policy Network. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(8), 621–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690903000187
  55. Purnamasari, P., Naimi Mohamad Nor, M., Frendika, R., Lasmanah, L., Afza Binti Amran, N., & Sharofi Ismail, M. (2022). The Influence of E-Government Services on Corruption in Indonesia and Malaysia. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v0i0.12332
  56. Purnomo, H., Irawati, R. H., Amin, S. M., Achdiawan, R., Shantiko, B., & Wardell, D. A. (2016). Multi-stakeholder processes to strengthen policies for small and medium-scale forestry enterprises in Indonesia. International Forestry Review, 18(4), 485–501. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554816820127596
  57. Quah, J. S. T. (2016). The Role of the Public Bureaucracy in Policy Implementation in Five ASEAN Countries. cambridge university. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316340653
  58. Rahmi, E., & Wijaya, C. (2022). Analysis of Public Service Quality Improvement Through Bureaucratic Simplification Policies. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 36, 29–41. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v36i1.7462
  59. Ratnawati, R. (2022). The Success of Transgenders In The Election Process For Public Officials: A Public Policy Reform In Indonesia. Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies, 2(12), 2743–2756. https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v2i12.658
  60. Ritahi, O., & Echaoui, A. (2024). Effects of Corruption, Government Effectiveness and Political stability on Economic Growth: Evidence from Morocco. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 14(4), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijefi.16225
  61. Rokhani, R., Fatikhul Khasan, A., Rondhi, M., Asrofi, A., Mori, Y., Kondo, T., & Suwandari, A. (2021). Improving the Efficacy of Climate Policy in the Indonesian Rice Sector: The Potential Use of Perceived-Impact Measures in Targeting Policy Beneficiaries. intechopen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.94004
  62. Rompis, A. E., Affandi, H., Saputra, R., & Muttaqin, Z. (2023). Discretion as a Government Policy Innovation in Indonesia. Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 21(2), 441–469. https://doi.org/10.4335/21.2.441-469(2023)
  63. Rukmono, B. S., Mu’arrifa, M., Maharani, A. E. P., Rustamaji, M., & Suwadi, P. (2023). The Urgency of the Principle of Public Policy as a Basis for Refusing the Execution of Commercial Arbitration Awards Submitted for Execution in Indonesia. Migration Letters, 20(6), 525–536. https://doi.org/10.59670/ml.v20i6.3502
  64. Saleh, C., Hendrik, E., Nuh, M., & Zauhar, S. (2021). COLLABORATIVE GOVERNANCE IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION PERSPECTIVE. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 56(6), 655–665. https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.56.6.58
  65. Sari, D. S. (2018). INDONESIAN GOVERNMENT POLICY ON ROHINGYA REFUGEES. Andalas Journal of International Studies (AJIS), 7(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.25077/ajis.7.1.1-13.2018
  66. Sarjito, A. (2024). GREEN GOVERNANCE: INTEGRATING ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY INTO PUBLIC DECISION-MAKING. Public Policy Journal, 5(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.37905/ppj.v5i1.2525
  67. Schick, A. (2003). Opportunity, strategy, and tactics in reforming public management. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 2(3), 7–34. https://doi.org/10.1787/budget-v2-art14-en
  68. Siregar, K. E., & Putra, A. M. S. (2024). Enhancing governance in Indonesian legal entity state universities: Insights from global best practices. Journal of Educational Management and Instruction (JEMIN), 4(1), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.22515/jemin.v4i1.9158
  69. Sulistiadi, W. (2023). Health Policy Reform through Strengthening Indonesia’s Health Resilience System. Journal of Indonesian Health Policy and Administration, 8(3), 106. https://doi.org/10.7454/ihpa.v8i3.7321
  70. Suneth, I. S., & Ismanto, H. (2014). Implementasi Kebijakan Publik Tentang Penataan dan Pemberdayaan Pedagang Kaki Lima (PKL). JKMP (Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Manajemen Publik), 2(1), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.21070/jkmp.v2i1.411
  71. Sutmasa, Y. G. (2021). Memastikan Efektivitas Implementasi Kebijakan Publik. Jurnal Ilmiah Cakrawarti, 4(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.47532/jic.v4i1.242
  72. Swint, J., Zhang, W., Marrison, A., & Gabriel, S. (2024). Syncing Strategy and Execution: A Systematic Review of Public Health Preparedness Policy Implementation. cold spring harbor laboratory. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.05.24311490
  73. Syamsiar, S. (2023). The Role of Digitalization in Enhancing Public Service Effectiveness in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 13(1), 465. https://doi.org/10.26858/jiap.v13i1.51026
  74. Thomas, V. (2017). Digital technologies and environmental change: examining the influence of social practices and public policies [lancaster university]. https://doi.org/10.17635/lancaster/thesis/169
  75. Tislenko, M. I. (2023). Financing Digital Transformation and Bridging Digital Divide: The Case of the European Union (pp. 337–343). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7411-3_36
  76. Ukhtiyani, K., & Indartono, S. (2020). Impacts of Indonesian Economic Growth: Remittances Migrant Workers and FDI. JEJAK, 13(2), 280–291. https://doi.org/10.15294/jejak.v13i2.23543
  77. Usmany, P. (2024). Government Policies and Corporate Social Responsibility: Analyzing the Influence on Organizational Practices and Stakeholder Perceptions. International Journal of Business, Law, and Education, 5(2), 1657–1666. https://doi.org/10.56442/ijble.v5i2.675
  78. Widhiasthini, N.W., Subawa, N.S., Prathama, G.H. and Pika, P.A.T.P. (2023) ‘Realisation of transparency implementation of e-procurement in the election campaign,’ Int. J. Procurement Management, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp.421–436 https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPM.2023.134627
  79. Widhiasthini, N. W., Subawa, N. S., Fong Emmerson, M., Yanti, N. K. W., Utami, M. S. M., Kusuma, P. S. A. J., … Sudharma, K. J. A. (2024). Public regulation urgency in cryptocurrency based on administrative reform for Bali's sustainable tourism. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2312657
  80. Wahyurudhanto, A. (2020). Critical Reorientation of Bureaucratic Reform and Good Governance in Public Sector Administration in Indonesia. Webology, 17(2), 308–316. https://doi.org/10.14704/web/v17i2/web17033
  81. Woolley, S. I., Pitt, J., Andras, P., Ortolani, M., Gardner, A., & Collins, T. (2021). Compounding barriers to fairness in the digital technology ecosystem. institute of electrical electronics engineers. https://doi.org/10.1109/istas52410.2021.9629166
  82. Wyner, A. J. (1984). Earthquakes and Public Policy Implementation in California. International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters, 2(2), 267–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/028072708400200204
  83. Yusnita, M., Kurniawan, I., & Hakim, A. (2024). Public Policy Analysis in Stunting Reduction: A Review of National Programs and Strategies. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, 5(05), 1182–1188. https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v5i05.1109

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.