Political Party Engagement on Social Media: Trends, Challenges, and Dynamics of Digital Campaigns
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31000/jgcs.v10i2.16658Keywords:
Social media, political campaigns, Digital CommunicationAbstract
Over the past ten years, social media has become a hub of digital campaigning by political parties, affecting the electoral policy and interaction with the population on the global scale. The purpose of the study is to map the intellectual terrain of the global research on political party engagement using social media between 2015 and 2025. Based on a bibliometric methodology developed in PRISMA guidelines and the data published through the Scopus database, the present study examines 554 identified articles through VOSviewer to represent the co-authorship, co-keywords, and country-collaboration networks. The results demonstrate that there are five key thematic groups, such as campaign strategies, disinformation, polarization, methodological approaches and country-specific case studies. Findings indicate that Facebook and Twitter are leading in the use of platforms, and new platforms such as Tik Tok and WhatsApp are becoming more and more influential in the Global South. The United States, United Kingdom, Germany, and Spain become leading contributors, which represents epistemic centrality in digital political studies. Nevertheless, voices and case studies of the Southeast Asian region, Sub-Saharan Africa, and Latin America are still underrepresented. The work will add to the digital democracy discussion by providing critical information on gaps in research, trends in collaboration across the world, and the dynamic character of the political campaigns in the digital world, thereby creating the way to more inclusive and interdisciplinary research in the future.
Selama satu dekade terakhir, media sosial telah menjadi pusat kampanye digital bagi partai politik, yang memengaruhi kebijakan elektoral serta interaksi dengan masyarakat dalam skala global. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memetakan lanskap intelektual riset global mengenai keterlibatan partai politik di media sosial antara tahun 2015 dan 2025. Dengan menggunakan metodologi bibliometrik yang mengacu pada pedoman PRISMA dan data dari basis data Scopus, studi ini menganalisis 554 artikel menggunakan perangkat lunak VOSviewer untuk memetakan jaringan kepenulisan bersama (co-authorship), kata kunci bersama (co-keywords), dan kolaborasi antarnegara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya lima kelompok tematik utama, yaitu strategi kampanye, disinformasi, polarisasi, pendekatan metodologis, dan studi kasus spesifik negara. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa Facebook dan Twitter mendominasi penggunaan platform, sementara platform baru seperti TikTok dan WhatsApp semakin berpengaruh di wilayah Global Selatan. Amerika Serikat, Inggris, Jerman, dan Spanyol menjadi kontributor utama, yang mencerminkan sentralitas epistemik dalam studi politik digital. Kendati demikian, perspektif dan studi kasus dari kawasan Asia Tenggara, Afrika Sub-Sahara, dan Amerika Latin masih kurang terwakili. Studi ini berkontribusi pada diskursus demokrasi digital dengan menyajikan informasi penting mengenai kesenjangan penelitian, tren kolaborasi global, serta dinamika kampanye politik di dunia digital, sehingga membuka jalan bagi penelitian yang lebih inklusif dan bersifat lintas disiplin di masa depan.
References
Ahmad, M. A., Ersoy, M., Salisu, Y. M., Dambo, T. H., & Dalhatu, S. (2025a). Trends in political and journalistic tweeting during electoral campaigns: A glimpse from Nigeria’s digital democracy. Journalism. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849251351494
Ahmad, M. A., Ersoy, M., Salisu, Y. M., Dambo, T. H., & Dalhatu, S. (2025b). Trends in political and journalistic tweeting during electoral campaigns: A glimpse from Nigeria’s digital democracy. Journalism. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849251351494
Aziz, A. I., & Bischoff, I. (2025). Social media campaigning and voter behavior–evidence for the German federal election 2021. European Journal of Political Economy, 88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2025.102685
Banerjee, R., & Mitra, S. (2024). Reconstituting the ‘good woman’: Gendered visual politics on social media during 2021 state election in West Bengal, India. Convergence. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565241287588
Bentivegna, S., & Rega, R. (2024). Politicians Under Fire: Citizens’ Incivility Against Political Leaders on Social Media. In Social Media and Society (Vol. 10, Issue 4). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051241298415
Borchers, N. S. (2025). How social media influencers support political parties in achieving campaign objectives, according to political communicators in Germany. Public Relations Review, 51(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102532
Budiana, M. (2024). Political Buzzers’ Role on Social Media During The 2019 Indonesian Presidential Election. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 40(2), 521–532. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2024-4002-30
Ceron, A., Berloto, S., & Rosco, J. (2024). What Are Crises for? The Effects on Users’ Engagement in the 2022 Italian Election. Politics and Governance, 12. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.8111
Chibuwe, A. (2025). Intersections of Citizen Journalism, Social Media Watchdogism, and Citizen Surveillance of the State and Political Elites in Zimbabwe’s 2023 Elections. African Studies Quarterly |, 23(1). https://journals.flvc.org/ASQ
Daniel, W. T., & Obholzer, L. (2025). Social media campaigning across multiple platforms: evidence from the 2024 European elections. West European Politics. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2025.2501464
Figeac, J., Neihouser, M., & Coz, F. Le. (2024). Data‐Campaigning on Facebook: Do Metrics of User Engagement Drive French Political Parties’ Publications? Media and Communication, 12. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.8487
Figeac, J., Neihouser, M., & Le Coz, F. (2025). The digital party paradox: Behind participationism, the persistence of traditional political repertoires on Facebook. European Journal of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231251340803
Grantham, S. (2024a). The rise of TikTok elections: the Australian Labor Party’s use of TikTok in the 2022 federal election campaigning. Communication Research and Practice, 10(2), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2024.2349451
Grantham, S. (2024b). The rise of TikTok elections: the Australian Labor Party’s use of TikTok in the 2022 federal election campaigning. Communication Research and Practice, 10(2), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2024.2349451
Haßler, J., Wurst, A. K., Pohl, K., & Kruschinski, S. (2024). A Consistent Picture? Issue‐Based Campaigning on Facebook During the 2021 German Federal Election Campaign. Politics and Governance, 12. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.8150
Husaeni, D. N. Al, Nandiyanto, A. B. D., & Maryanti, R. (2022). Bibliometric Analysis of Special Needs Education Keyword Using VOSviewer Indexed by Google Scholar. Indonesian Journal of Community and Special Needs Education, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijcsne.v3i1.43181
Lukito, J., Macdonald, M., Chen, B., Brown, M. A., Prochaska, S., Yang, Y., Greenfield, J., Suk, J., Zhong, W., Dahlke, R., & Borah, P. (2025). Candidates Be Posting: Multi-Platform Strategies and Partisan Preferences in the 2022 U.S. Midterm Elections. Social Media and Society, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051251337541
Magin, M., Larsson, A. O., Skogerbø, E., & Tønnesen, H. (2024). What makes the difference? Social media platforms and party characteristics as contextual factors for political parties’ use of populist political communication. Nordicom Review, 45(s1), 36–65. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0007
Martin-Gutierrez, S., Robles Morales, J. M., Torcal, M., Losada, J. C., & Benito, R. M. (2024). In-party love spreads more efficiently than out-party hate in online communities. Scientific Reports, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65688-9
Musi, E., Garcia Aguila, E. E., & Federico, L. (2024). Botlitica: A generative AI-based tool to assist journalists in navigating political propaganda campaigns. Studies in Communication Sciences, 24(1), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.24434/j.scoms.2024.01.4270
Nandiyanto, A. B. D., & Al Husaeni, D. F. (2021). A bibliometric analysis of materials research in Indonesian journal using VOSviewer. Journal of Engineering Research (Kuwait), 9. https://doi.org/10.36909/jer.ASSEEE.16037
Nistor, R. M., & Stretea, A. I. (2025). DISMISS, DISTORT , DISTRACT, DISMAY: THE CIVIL SOCIETY IN MOLDOVA IN THE FACE OF DISINFORMATION. Civil Szemle, 22(1), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.62560/csz.2025.01.11
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. In The BMJ (Vol. 372). BMJ Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Pastuhov, A., & Sivenius, A. (2024). Educating for political campaigning on social media via enhancing technical expertise: An analysis of the candidate education practices in a Finnish conservative-liberal party. Studies in the Education of Adults. https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2024.2370066
Prior, H. (2024). Social media and the rise of radical right populism in Portugal: the communicative strategies of André Ventura on X in the 2022 elections. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03224-w
Rossini, P., Southern, R., Harmer, E., & Stromer-Galley, J. (2024). Unleash Britain’s Potential (To Go Negative): Campaign Negativity in the 2017 and 2019 UK General Elections on Facebook. Political Studies Review, 22(3), 449–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/14789299231171308
Sarasqueta, G., Ferrero, M., Olmedo, S., Rojas Montiel, E. R., Castillo Peñaherrera, C., Martínez Rodríguez, R., Maíz de Sotomayor, N., Salinas Goytia, J. R., & Ames Tineo de Saavedra, A. C. (2025). The construction of political narratives in South American electoral campaigns: a social media analysis. Revista Latina de Comunicacion Social, 2025(83). https://doi.org/10.4185/rlcs-2025-2442
Sinpeng, A. (2024). Social Media and the DIY Politics in Thailand’s 2023 Election. Pacific Affairs, 97(1), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.5509/2024971-art5
Sriyai, S., & Kwanyou, A. (2025). Pathways of Persuasion: Unravelling Narrative Dynamics in Thailand’s 2023 General Election. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034251322794
Tawiah, A. (2025a). Social Media Campaign Strategies: A Case Study of Political Issue Framing by 2024 Presidential Candidates in Ghana. Journalism and Media, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6020072
Tawiah, A. (2025b). Social Media Campaign Strategies: A Case Study of Political Issue Framing by 2024 Presidential Candidates in Ghana. Journalism and Media, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6020072
Tønnesen, H., Bene, M., Haßler, J., Larsson, A. O., Magin, M., Skogerbø, E., & Wurst, A. K. (2025). Between anger and love: A multi-level study on the impact of policy issues on user reactions in national election campaigns on Facebook in Germany, Hungary, and Norway. New Media and Society, 27(4), 2313–2335. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231208122
Westlake, D., & Robbins-Kanter, J. (2025). Class Identity and Candidate Self-Presentation: Evidence from Canadian Provincial Elections. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 58(1), 219–244. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423924000763
Widholm, A., Ekman, M., & Larsson, A. O. (2024). A Right-Wing Wave on TikTok? Ideological Orientations, Platform Features, and User Engagement During the Early 2022 Election Campaign in Sweden. Social Media and Society, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051241269266
Yavetz, G. (2025). Populist rhetoric and digital politics: a case study from a Facebook campaign in Israel’s 2022 elections. Cogent Social Sciences, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2025.2476048
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Akhmad Habibullah, Nooraneda Mutalip Laidey, Joseph Moyinoluwa Talabi, Sylvester Cortes, Aulia Kartika Putri

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the full copyright of their published articles while granting the Journal of Government and Civil Society (JGCS) the right of first publication under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0). Detailed licensing terms can be accessed at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.
Authors are permitted to redistribute their published work in other venues, such as institutional repositories, personal academic websites, or book chapters, provided that its original publication in JGCS is explicitly acknowledged.
Furthermore, authors are encouraged to disseminate their manuscripts through preprint servers or academic research networks prior to and during the submission process to enhance scholarly visibility and research impact.