New Public Management New Public Comparison Meta-Analysis Developed and Developing Country policies
Abstract
This study aims to determine the development of research on new public management policies in developed and developing countries in the last five years. To find out, we reviewed hundreds of related journals related to new general management policies in developed and developing countries with the previous 5-year edition from 2016 to 2020. Then we compared the concepts used in new public management in developed and developing countries. This study used a qualitative research method with a review of previous research. Sources are selected articles published in the Scopus database in the last five years, from 2016 to 2020. Selected items are publications relevant to new public management policy topics in developed and developing countries. This study's results were obtained through a data analysis process using the Nvivo 12 Plus and VOSviwer applications. The results showed 90 concepts in studying new public management policies in developed countries and categorized them into five groups. Again, new public management policies in developing countries have 58 concepts and can be categorized into four groups. The significance of this research is the discovery of mapping new public management policy concepts in developed and developing countries to assist in developing a conceptual framework in subsequent studies and can see the novelty in further research.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perkembangan penelitian pada tema kebijakan manajemen publik baru di negara maju dan negara berkembang dalam kurung waktu lima tahun terakhir. Untuk mengetahuinya, kami mereview ratusan jurnal terkait kebijakan manajemen publik baru di negara maju dan negara berkembang dengan edisi lima tahun sebelumnya dari tahun 2016 sampai dengan 2020. Kemudian membandingkan konsep yang digunakan pada manajemen publik baru di negara maju dan negara berkembang. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan mereview dari penelitian sebelumnya. Sumber dipilih yang diterbitkan di data base scopus dalam lima tahun terakhir, dari 2016 hingga 2020. Artikel yang dipilih adalah publikasi yang relevan dengan topik kebijakan manajemen publik baru di negara maju dan negara berkembang. Hasil penelitian ini diperoleh melalui proses analisis data menggunakan Aplikasi Nvivo 12 dan VOSviwer. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat 90 konsep dalam kajian kebijakan manajemen publik baru di negara maju dan dapat dikategorikan menjadi lima kelompok. Selanjutnya kebijakan manajemen publik baru di negara berkembang terdapat lima puluh delapan konsep dan dapat di kategorikan menjadi empat kelompok. Signifikansi penelitian ini adalah ditemukannya pemetaan konsep kebijakan manajemen publik baru di negara maju dan negara berkembang sehingga dapat membantu dalam pengembangan kerangka konseptual pada kajian-kajian selanjutnya serta dapat melihat kebaruan dalam meneliti selanjutnya.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alamsyah, A. (2016). Perkembangan Paradigma Administrasi Publik (New Public Administration, New Public Management dan New Public Service). Jurnal Publik Profetik, 04(2), 172–199. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24252/profetik.v4i2a4
Anglada-Tort, M., & Sanfilippo, K. R. M. (2019). Visualizing Music Psychology: A Bibliometric Analysis of Psychology of Music , Music Perception , and Musicae Scientiae from 1973 to 2017 . Music & Science, 2, 205920431881178. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059204318811786
Apriliyanti, I. D., & Alon, I. (2017). Bibliometric analysis of absorptive capacity. International Business Review, 26(5), 896–907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.02.007
Cumming, D. J., & Johan, S. A. (2019). Crowdfunding: Fundamental cases, facts, and insights. In Crowdfunding: Fundamental Cases, Facts, and Insights. College of Business, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, United States: Elsevier. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85094672929&partnerID=40&md5=4dcfa5bcadb7c2bee3014add911e337f
Habibi, F. (2020). Pemetaan Riset Reformasi Birokrasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 16(2), 199–230. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v16i2.695
Heidari, R., Yazdanparast, R., & Jabbarzadeh, A. (2019). Sustainable design of a municipal solid waste management system considering waste separators: A real-world application. Sustainable Cities and Society. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85061549805&doi=10.1016%2Fj.scs.2019.101457&partnerID=40&md5=b5a38d9d928706bc2dd65cef30702fa8
Hood, C., & Dixon, R. (2015). Commentary What We Have to Show for 30 Years of New Public Management : Higher Costs , More Complaints. 28(3), 265–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12150
Ikeanyibe, O. M. (2016). New Public Management and Administrative Reforms in Nigeria. International Journal of Public Administration. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84948823647&doi=10.1080%2F01900692.2015.1023446&partnerID=40&md5=fea57f66bbd6f43cf39ea06dc51b25c7
Kharisma, B. (2014). Dalam Sektor Publik Dan Swasta ( Suatu Pendekatan Ekonomi Kelembagaan ). Jurnal Buletin Studi Ekonomi, Vol., Vol. 19(1), 9–30.
Lim, W.-S., Liang, C.-K., Assantachai, P., Auyeung, T. W., Kang, L., Lee, W.-J., … Arai, H. (2020). COVID-19 and older people in Asia: Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia calls to actions. Geriatrics and Gerontology International.
Mørk, A. (2020). From boots on the ground to followers in the sky: Volunteer mobilization and populist rhetoric in the presidential campaigns of Barack Obama and Donald Trump. American Studies in Scandinavia, 52(2), 183–210. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85095125973&partnerID=40&md5=e787263c0ff1ededc43fd4f7b066c8c9
Oscar Basulto, G., Pablo Segovia, L., & Cristián Jullian, S. (2020). Social imaginaries and representations regarding 2011’s student movements: Towards a configuration of a media profile of the El Mercurio S.A.P. group | Imaginarios y representaciones para configurar un perfil mediático de la prensa tradicional en Chile: E. Universum, 35(1), 250–287. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-23762020000100250
Pedersen, J. S., & Wilkinson, A. (2018). The digital society and provision of welfare services. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85043379855&doi=10.1108%2FIJSSP-05-2017-0062&partnerID=40&md5=f3c36ea7d4766b1ab9b5fdcaa0474497
Prabowo, T. J. W. (2018). Reforms in public sector accounting and budgeting in Indonesia (2003-2015): Confusions in implementation. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85044256744&doi=10.1108%2FJPBAFM-03-2018-002&partnerID=40&md5=1e3966ad09e44a6c2d3e23796819e6c2
Raharjanto, T. (2019). Systematic Literature Reviews: Sistem Merit Dalam Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Sektor Publik. Jurnal Pemerintahan Dan Keamanan Publik (JP Dan KP), 1(2), 103–116.
Rosyadi, S., & Dharma, S. (2014). New Public Management Practices at Local Government in Indonesia: A Case Study of Wonosobo Government, Central Java. (Icpm), 46–51. https://doi.org/10.2991/icpm-14.2014.8
Rushananto. (2014). Kebijakan Publik. Kebijakan Publik, (1993), 15.
Tampubolon, M. P. (2020). Change Management Manajemen Perubahan : Individu, Tim Kerja Organisasi. Penerbit Mitra Wacana Media.
Taufiqurokhman, & Satispi, E. (2018). Teori Dan Perkembangan Manajemen Pelayanan Publik. Umj Press 2018, 266.
Waheduzzaman, W. (2019). Challenges in transitioning from new public management to new public governance in a developing country context. International Journal of Public Sector Management. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85073697776&doi=10.1108%2FIJPSM-02-2019-0057&partnerID=40&md5=a4367b44a85fbe960b997db822ccdc52
Waheduzzaman, Wahed. (2019). Challenges in transitioning from new public management to new public governance in a developing country context. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 32(7), 689–705. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-02-2019-0057
Zhong, L., & Fisher, K. R. (2017). Participation and Chinese non-government organization accountability. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85035136921&doi=10.1108%2FIJSSP-08-2015-0086&partnerID=40&md5=771f2ada92177a7e02b29815a19385a8
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/jgcs.v5i2.3969
Article Metrics
Abstract - 2434 PDF - 1645Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Government and Civil Society
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Journal of Government and Civil Society is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License .